{ "totalResults": 34, "totalHitCount": 0, "results": [ { "fields": { "rowid": "903 5521 5522 5523", "disputeid": "13306", "disputecitation": "AbitibiBowater Inc. v. Government of Canada (ICSID Case No. UNCT/10/1)", "fullcitation": "AbitibiBowater Inc. v. Government of Canada (ICSID Case No. UNCT/10/1)", "disputestartdate": "20100225", "isdisputecitation": "1", "modifiedon": "20210216", "field_respondentstates": "Canada", "field_100": "26204", "field_101": "578", "field_106": "14282", "field_108": "403", "field_109": "403", "field_110": "20100225", "field_145": "332", "field_67": "AbitibiBowater Inc. v. Government of Canada", "field_68": "ICSID Case No. UNCT/10/1", "field_69": "12324", "field_70": "11086", "field_71": "UN/0034", "field_72": "AbitibiBowater v. Canada", "field_73": "AbitibiBowater Inc. v. Government of Canada (ICSID Case No. UNCT/10/1)", "field_74": "1855", "field_77": "2290", "field_78": "112", "field_82": "2390", "field_83": "113", "contenttypedatamasterid": "19269 19270 19271", "field_documenttypeid": "1075 1074", "field_137": "True", "field_56": "15208", "field_57": "UN/0034/01 UN/0034/02 UN/0034/03", "field_58": "Notice of Intent to Submit a Claim to Arbitration Notice of Arbitration Consent Award", "field_59": "AbitibiBowater v. Canada Notice of Intent to Submit a Claim to Arbitration AbitibiBowater v. Canada Notice of Arbitration AbitibiBowater v. Canada Consent Award", "field_60": "AbitibiBowater Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/10/1, Notice of Intent to Submit a Claim to Arbitration, 23 April 2009 AbitibiBowater Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/10/1, Notice of Arbitration, 25 February 2010 AbitibiBowater Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/10/1, Consent Award, 15 December 2010", "field_61": "20090423 20100225 20101215", "field_62": "234", "Filename": "db://FE_SelectDisputeViewForContegraSearch#RowId=903", "field_102": "6214,5097,2385,2615,7772,7773,26205,8067,26207,26208", "field_103": "660,660,660,660,1474,1474,1474,1474,26206,26206", "field_104": "8071,8070,3368,26209", "field_105": "900,900,900,900" }, "paragraphs": null, "hitCount": 0, "highlightedFields": null }, { "fields": { "rowid": "977 6674", "disputeid": "13381", "disputecitation": "Bahige Bassem Chaaban and others v. Government of Canada", "fullcitation": "Bahige Bassem Chaaban and others v. Government of Canada", "isdisputecitation": "1", "field_respondentstates": "Canada", "field_109": "403", "field_67": "Bahige Bassem Chaaban and others v. Government of Canada", "field_69": "12324", "field_71": "UN/0109", "field_72": "CEN Biotech v. Canada", "field_73": "Bahige Bassem Chaaban and others v. Government of Canada", "contenttypedatamasterid": "20438", "field_documenttypeid": "1076", "field_137": "True", "field_56": "15283", "field_57": "UN/0109/01", "field_58": "Notice of Intent", "field_59": "CEN Biotech v. Canada Notice of Intent", "field_60": "Bahige Bassem Chaaban and others v. Government of Canada, Notice of Intent, 1 September 2015", "field_61": "20150901", "field_62": "234", "Filename": "db://FE_SelectDisputeViewForContegraSearch#RowId=977" }, "paragraphs": null, "hitCount": 0, "highlightedFields": null }, { "fields": { "rowid": "1031 7218 7219 7220", "disputeid": "13435", "disputecitation": "Contractual Obligation Productions, LLC, Charles Robert Underwood and Carl Paolino v. Government of Canada", "fullcitation": "Contractual Obligation Productions, LLC, Charles Robert Underwood and Carl Paolino v. Government of Canada", "isdisputecitation": "1", "field_respondentstates": "Canada", "field_109": "403", "field_67": "Contractual Obligation Productions, LLC, Charles Robert Underwood and Carl Paolino v. Government of Canada", "field_69": "12324", "field_70": "11086", "field_71": "UN/0163", "field_72": "Contractual Obligation Productions v. Canada", "field_73": "Contractual Obligation Productions, LLC, Charles Robert Underwood and Carl Paolino v. Government of Canada", "contenttypedatamasterid": "20982 20983 20984", "field_documenttypeid": "1076 1079", "field_137": "True", "field_56": "15337", "field_57": "UN/0163/01 UN/0163/02 UN/0163/03", "field_58": "Notice of Intent Statement of Claim Amended Statement of Claim", "field_59": "Contractual Obligation Productions v. Canada Notice of Intent Contractual Obligation Productions v. Canada Statement of Claim Contractual Obligation Productions v. Canada Amended Statement of Claim", "field_60": "Contractual Obligation Productions, LLC, Charles Robert Underwood and Carl Paolino v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Notice of Intent, 15 June 2004 Contractual Obligation Productions, LLC, Charles Robert Underwood and Carl Paolino v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Statement of Claim, 31 January 2005 Contractual Obligation Productions, LLC, Charles Robert Underwood and Carl Paolino v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Amended Statement of Claim, 16 June 2005", "field_61": "20040615 20050131 20050616", "field_62": "234", "Filename": "db://FE_SelectDisputeViewForContegraSearch#RowId=1031" }, "paragraphs": null, "hitCount": 0, "highlightedFields": null }, { "fields": { "rowid": "899 5355 5356 5357 5358 5359 5360 5361 5362 5363 5364 5365 5366 5367 5368 5369 5370 5371 5372 5373 5374 5375 5376 5377 5378 5379 5380 5381 7984 7985 7986 7987 7988 7989", "disputeid": "13302", "disputecitation": "Crompton (Chemtura) Corp. v. Government of Canada (PCA Case No. 2008-01)", "fullcitation": "Crompton (Chemtura) Corp. v. Government of Canada (PCA Case No. 2008-01)", "disputestartdate": "20001017", "isdisputecitation": "1", "modifiedon": "20210216", "field_respondentstates": "Canada", "field_100": "13667", "field_101": "578", "field_106": "14285", "field_108": "403", "field_109": "403", "field_110": "20001017", "field_145": "332", "field_67": "Crompton (Chemtura) Corp. v. Government of Canada", "field_68": "PCA Case No. 2008-01", "field_69": "12324", "field_70": "11086", "field_71": "UN/0030", "field_72": "Chemtura v. Canada", "field_73": "Crompton (Chemtura) Corp. v. Government of Canada (PCA Case No. 2008-01)", "field_74": "1836", "field_77": "2327", "field_78": "112", "field_82": "2521", "field_83": "113", "contenttypedatamasterid": "19086 19087 19088 19089 19090 19091 19092 19093 19094 19095 19096 19097 19098 19105 19106 19107 19108 19109 19110 19111 19112 19113 19114 19115 19116 19117 19118 23269 23270 23271 23272 23273 23274", "field_documenttypeid": "1080 1074 1076 1075 1079 1077", "field_137": "True", "field_56": "15204", "field_57": "UN/0030/01 UN/0030/02 UN/0030/03 UN/0030/04 UN/0030/05 UN/0030/06 UN/0030/07 UN/0030/08 UN/0030/09 UN/0030/10 UN/0030/11 UN/0030/12 UN/0030/13 UN/0030/17 UN/0030/18 UN/0030/19 UN/0030/20 UN/0030/21 UN/0030/22 UN/0030/23 UN/0030/24 UN/0030/25 UN/0030/26 UN/0030/27 UN/0030/28 UN/0030/29 UN/0030/30 UN/0030/31 UN/0030/32 UN/0030/33 UN/0030/34 UN/0030/35 UN/0030/36", "field_58": "Procedural Order 1 Confidentiality Order (Procedural Order 2) Procedural Order 3 Procedural Order 4 Procedural Order 5 Supplement to Proc Order 3 Award Notice of Intent Second Notice of Intent Third Notice of Intent Notice of Arbitration Second Notice of Arbitration Claimant Memorial (Public Version) Respondent Post-Hearing Brief Claimant Post-Hearing Brief (Public Version) Respondent Submission of Costs Claimant Submission on Costs Procedural Order No. 6 United States 1128 Submission Mexico 1128 Submission Transcript of Hearing - Day One Transcript of Hearing - Day Two Transcript of Hearing - Day Three Transcript of Hearing - Day Four Transcript of Hearing - Day Five Transcript of Hearing - Day Six Transcript of Hearing - Day Seven Respondent Counter-Memorial (Public Version) [Part A] Respondent Counter-Memorial (Public Version) [Part B] Claimant Reply (Public Version) [Part A] Claimant Reply (Public Version) [Part B] Respondent Rejoinder (Public Version) [Part A] Respondent Rejoinder (Public Version) [Part B]", "field_59": "Chemtura v. Canada Procedural Order 1 Chemtura v. Canada Confidentiality Order (Procedural Order 2) Chemtura v. Canada Procedural Order 3 Chemtura v. Canada Procedural Order 4 Chemtura v. Canada Procedural Order 5 Chemtura v. Canada Supplement to Proc Order 3 Chemtura v. Canada Award Chemtura v. Canada Notice of Intent Chemtura v. Canada Second Notice of Intent Chemtura v. Canada Third Notice of Intent Chemtura v. Canada Notice of Arbitration Chemtura v. Canada Second Notice of Arbitration Chemtura v. Canada Claimant Memorial (Public Version) Chemtura v. Canada Respondent Post-Hearing Brief Chemtura v. Canada Claimant Post-Hearing Brief (Public Version) Chemtura v. Canada Respondent Submission of Costs Chemtura v. Canada Claimant Submission on Costs Chemtura v. Canada Procedural Order No. 6 Chemtura v. Canada United States 1128 Submission Chemtura v. Canada Mexico 1128 Submission Chemtura v. Canada Transcript of Hearing - Day One Chemtura v. Canada Transcript of Hearing - Day Two Chemtura v. Canada Transcript of Hearing - Day Three Chemtura v. Canada Transcript of Hearing - Day Four Chemtura v. Canada Transcript of Hearing - Day Five Chemtura v. Canada Transcript of Hearing - Day Six Chemtura v. Canada Transcript of Hearing - Day Seven Chemtura v. Canada Respondent Counter-Memorial (Public Version) [Part A] Chemtura v. Canada Respondent Counter-Memorial (Public Version) [Part B] Chemtura v. Canada Claimant Reply (Public Version) [Part A] Chemtura v. Canada Claimant Reply (Public Version) [Part B] Chemtura v. Canada Respondent Rejoinder (Public Version) [Part A] Chemtura v. Canada Respondent Rejoinder (Public Version) [Part B]", "field_60": "Crompton (Chemtura) Corp. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-01, Procedural Order No. 1, 21 January 2008 Crompton (Chemtura) Corp. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-01, Confidentiality Order, 21 January 2008 Crompton (Chemtura) Corp. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-01, Procedural Order No. 3, 8 August 2008 Crompton (Chemtura) Corp. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-01, Procedural Order No. 4, 18 March 2009 Crompton (Chemtura) Corp. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-01, Procedural Order No. 5, 30 July 2009 Crompton (Chemtura) Corp. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-01, Supplement to Procedural Order 3, 15 August 2008 Crompton (Chemtura) Corp. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-01, Award, 2 August 2010 Crompton (Chemtura) Corp. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-01, Notice of Intent, 6 November 2001 Crompton (Chemtura) Corp. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-01, Second Notice of Intent, 4 April 2002 Crompton (Chemtura) Corp. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-01, Third Notice of Intent, 19 September 2002 Crompton (Chemtura) Corp. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-01, Notice of Arbitration, 17 October 2002 Crompton (Chemtura) Corp. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-01, Second Notice of Arbitration, 10 February 2005 Crompton (Chemtura) Corp. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-01, Claimant Memorial (Public Version), 2 June 2008 Crompton (Chemtura) Corp. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-01, Respondent Post-Hearing Brief, 23 October 2009 Crompton (Chemtura) Corp. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-01, Claimant Post-Hearing Brief (Public Version), 23 October 2009 Crompton (Chemtura) Corp. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-01, Respondent Submission of Costs, 15 February 2010 Crompton (Chemtura) Corp. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-01, Claimant Submission on Costs, 15 February 2010 Crompton (Chemtura) Corp. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-01, Procedural Order No. 6, 29 September 2009 Crompton (Chemtura) Corp. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-01, United States 1128 Submission, 31 July 2009 Crompton (Chemtura) Corp. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-01, Mexico 1128 Submission, 31 July 2009 Crompton (Chemtura) Corp. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-01, Transcript of Hearing - Day One, 2 September 2009 Crompton (Chemtura) Corp. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-01, Transcript of Hearing - Day Two, 3 September 2009 Crompton (Chemtura) Corp. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-01, Transcript of Hearing - Day Three, 4 September 2009 Crompton (Chemtura) Corp. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-01, Transcript of Hearing - Day Four, 5 September 2009 Crompton (Chemtura) Corp. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-01, Transcript of Hearing - Day Five, 7 September 2009 Crompton (Chemtura) Corp. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-01, Transcript of Hearing - Day Six, 8 September 2009 Crompton (Chemtura) Corp. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-01, Transcript of Hearing - Day Seven, 17 December 2009 Crompton (Chemtura) Corp. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-01, Respondent Counter-Memorial (Public Version), 20 October 2008 [Part A] Crompton (Chemtura) Corp. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-01, Respondent Counter-Memorial (Public Version), 20 October 2008 [Part B] Crompton (Chemtura) Corp. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-01, Claimant Reply (Public Version), 15 May 2009 [Part A] Crompton (Chemtura) Corp. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-01, Claimant Reply (Public Version), 15 May 2009 [Part B] Crompton (Chemtura) Corp. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-01, Respondent Rejoinder (Public Version), 10 July 2009 [Part A] Crompton (Chemtura) Corp. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-01, Respondent Rejoinder (Public Version), 10 July 2009 [Part B]", "field_61": "20080121 20080808 20090318 20090730 20080815 20100802 20011106 20020404 20020919 20021017 20050210 20080602 20091023 20100215 20090929 20090731 20090902 20090903 20090904 20090905 20090907 20090908 20091217 20081020 20090515 20090710", "field_62": "234", "Filename": "db://FE_SelectDisputeViewForContegraSearch#RowId=899", "field_102": "8065,8066,8067,8068", "field_103": "1474,1474,1474,1474", "field_104": "8069,8070,8071,8072,8073,8074,8075,8076,8077", "field_105": "900,900,900,900,900,900,900,900,900" }, "paragraphs": null, "hitCount": 0, "highlightedFields": null }, { "fields": { "rowid": "913 5688 5689 5690 5691 5692 5693 5694 5695 5696 5697 5698 5699 5700 5701 5702 5703 5704 5705 5706 5707 5708 5709 5710 5711 5712 5713 5714 5715 5716 5717 5718 5719 5720 5721 5722", "disputeid": "13316", "disputecitation": "Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of Canada (PCA Case No. 2012-25)", "fullcitation": "Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of Canada (PCA Case No. 2012-25)", "disputestartdate": "20110429", "isdisputecitation": "1", "modifiedon": "20210222", "field_respondentstates": "Canada", "field_100": "13684", "field_101": "578", "field_106": "14289", "field_108": "578", "field_109": "403", "field_110": "20110429", "field_145": "332", "field_67": "Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of Canada", "field_68": "PCA Case No. 2012-25", "field_69": "12324", "field_70": "11090", "field_71": "UN/0044", "field_72": "Detroit Bridge v. Canada", "field_73": "Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of Canada (PCA Case No. 2012-25)", "field_74": "4939", "field_77": "2054", "field_78": "112", "field_82": "1844", "field_83": "113", "contenttypedatamasterid": "19442 19443 19444 19445 19446 19447 19448 19449 19450 19451 19452 19453 19454 19455 19456 19457 19458 19459 19460 19461 19462 19463 19464 19465 19466 19467 19468 19469 19470 19471 19472 19473 19474 19475 19476", "field_documenttypeid": "1076 1075 1080 1079 1072 1077 1074 1081 1064", "field_137": "True", "field_56": "15218", "field_57": "UN/0044/01 UN/0044/02 UN/0044/03 UN/0044/04 UN/0044/05 UN/0044/06 UN/0044/07 UN/0044/08 UN/0044/09 UN/0044/10 UN/0044/11 UN/0044/12 UN/0044/13 UN/0044/14 UN/0044/15 UN/0044/16 UN/0044/17 UN/0044/18 UN/0044/19 UN/0044/20 UN/0044/21 UN/0044/22 UN/0044/23 UN/0044/24 UN/0044/25 UN/0044/26 UN/0044/27 UN/0044/28 UN/0044/29 UN/0044/30 UN/0044/31 UN/0044/32 UN/0044/33 UN/0044/34 UN/0044/35", "field_58": "Notice of Intent to Arbitrate Notice of Intent to Submit a Claim to Arbitration Notice of Arbitration Procedural Order No. 1 Claimant Amended Notice of Arbitration Claimant Submission Concerning Place of Arbitration Respondent Submission Concerning Place of Arbitration Procedural Order No. 2 Claimant Statement of Claim Respondent Brief Statement on Jurisdiction and Admissibility Claimant Response to Brief Statement on Jurisdiction and Admissibility Procedural Order No. 3 Procedural Order No. 4 Confidentiality Order Respondent Memorial on Jurisdiction and Admissibility Procedural Order No. 5 Respondent Reply Memorial on Jurisdiction and Admissibility Claimant Counter-Memorial on Jurisdiction and Admissibility Mexico 1128 Submission United States 1128 Submission Claimant Response to 1128 Submissions Respondent Response to 1128 Submissions Procedural Order No. 6 Procedural Order No. 7 United States Letter to Tribunal on Hearing Attendance Respondent Letter to Tribunal on Confidentiality Order United States Letter to Tribunal on Hearing Transcripts Claimant Letter to Tribunal on Confidentiality Order Procedural Order No. 8 Procedural Order No. 9 Claimant Letter to Tribunal on Procedural Order No. 9 Award on Jurisdiction Separate Dissenting Jurisdictional Statement of Michael Chertoff Award on Costs Claimant Rejoinder Memorial on Jurisdiction and Admissibility", "field_59": "Detroit Bridge v. Canada Notice of Intent to Arbitrate Detroit Bridge v. Canada Notice of Intent to Submit a Claim to Arbitration Detroit Bridge v. Canada Notice of Arbitration Detroit Bridge v. Canada Procedural Order No. 1 Detroit Bridge v. Canada Claimant Amended Notice of Arbitration Detroit Bridge v. Canada Claimant Submission Concerning Place of Arbitration Detroit Bridge v. Canada Respondent Submission Concerning Place of Arbitration Detroit Bridge v. Canada Procedural Order No. 2 Detroit Bridge v. Canada Claimant Statement of Claim Detroit Bridge v. Canada Respondent Brief Statement on Jurisdiction and Admissibility Detroit Bridge v. Canada Claimant Response to Brief Statement on Jurisdiction and Admissibility Detroit Bridge v. Canada Procedural Order No. 3 Detroit Bridge v. Canada Procedural Order No. 4 Detroit Bridge v. Canada Confidentiality Order Detroit Bridge v. Canada Respondent Memorial on Jurisdiction and Admissibility Detroit Bridge v. Canada Procedural Order No. 5 Detroit Bridge v. Canada Respondent Reply Memorial on Jurisdiction and Admissibility Detroit Bridge v. Canada Claimant Counter-Memorial on Jurisdiction and Admissibility Detroit Bridge v. Canada Mexico 1128 Submission Detroit Bridge v. Canada United States 1128 Submission Detroit Bridge v. Canada Claimant Response to 1128 Submissions Detroit Bridge v. Canada Respondent Response to 1128 Submissions Detroit Bridge v. Canada Procedural Order No. 6 Detroit Bridge v. Canada Procedural Order No. 7 Detroit Bridge v. Canada United States Letter to Tribunal on Hearing Attendance Detroit Bridge v. Canada Respondent Letter to Tribunal on Confidentiality Order Detroit Bridge v. Canada United States Letter to Tribunal on Hearing Transcripts Detroit Bridge v. Canada Claimant Letter to Tribunal on Confidentiality Order Detroit Bridge v. Canada Procedural Order No. 8 Detroit Bridge v. Canada Procedural Order No. 9 Detroit Bridge v. Canada Claimant Letter to Tribunal on Procedural Order No. 9 Detroit Bridge v. Canada Award on Jurisdiction Detroit Bridge v. Canada Separate Dissenting Jurisdictional Statement of Michael Chertoff Detroit Bridge v. Canada Award on Costs Detroit Bridge v. Canada Claimant Rejoinder Memorial on Jurisdiction and Admissibility", "field_60": "Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-25, Notice of Intent to Arbitrate, 25 January 2010 Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-25, Notice of Intent to Submit a Claim to Arbitration, 23 March 2010 Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-25, Notice of Arbitration, 29 April 2011 Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-25, Procedural Order No. 1, 20 December 2012 Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-25, Claimant Amended Notice of Arbitration, 15 January 2013 Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-25, Claimant Submission Concerning Place of Arbitration, 15 January 2013 Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-25, Respondent Submission Concerning Place of Arbitration, 15 January 2013 Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-25, Procedural Order No. 2, 28 January 2013 Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-25, Claimant Statement of Claim, 31 January 2013 Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-25, Respondent Brief Statement on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 22 February 2013 Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-25, Claimant Response to Brief Statement on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 15 March 2013 Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-25, Procedural Order No. 3, 27 March 2013 Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-25, Procedural Order No. 4, 27 March 2013 Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-25, Confidentiality Order, 27 March 2013 Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-25, Respondent Memorial on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 15 June 2013 Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-25, Procedural Order No. 5, 27 September 2013 Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-25, Respondent Reply Memorial on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 6 December 2013 Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-25, Claimant Counter-Memorial on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 23 August 2013 Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-25, Mexico 1128 Submission, 14 February 2014 Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-25, United States 1128 Submission, 14 February 2014 Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-25, Claimant Response to 1128 Submissions, 3 March 2014 Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-25, Respondent Response to 1128 Submissions, 3 March 2014 Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-25, Procedural Order No. 6, 18 March 2014 Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-25, Procedural Order No. 7, 25 March 2014 Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-25, Letter to Tribunal on Hearing Attendance, 19 March 2014 Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-25, Respondent Letter to Tribunal on Confidentiality Order, 17 April 2014 Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-25, United States Letter to Tribunal on Hearing Transcripts, 29 April 2014 Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-25, Claimant Letter to Tribunal on Confidentiality Order, 2 May 2014 Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-25, Procedural Order No. 8, 12 May 2014 Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-25, Procedural Order No. 9, 5 June 2014 Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-25, Claimant Letter to Tribunal on Procedural Order No. 9, 12 June 2014 Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-25, Award on Jurisdiction, 2 April 2015 Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-25, Separate Dissenting Jurisdictional Statement of Michael Chertoff, 2 April 2015 Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-25, Award on Costs, 17 August 2015 Detroit International Bridge Company v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-25, Claimant Rejoinder Memorial on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 31 January 2014", "field_61": "20100125 20100323 20110429 20121220 20130115 20130128 20130131 20130222 20130315 20130327 20130615 20130927 20131206 20130823 20140214 20140303 20140318 20140325 20140319 20140417 20140429 20140502 20140512 20140605 20140612 20150402 20150817 20140131", "field_62": "234", "Filename": "db://FE_SelectDisputeViewForContegraSearch#RowId=913", "field_102": "4454,4455,4456,4457,4458,4459,3406,4669,7921,26250", "field_103": "742,742,742,742,742,742,875,875,875,742", "field_104": "3368,4341,4460,8071,8076,4355,26249", "field_105": "900,900,900,900,900,900,900", "field_75": "281", "field_150": "21401 21400" }, "paragraphs": null, "hitCount": 0, "highlightedFields": null }, { "fields": { "rowid": "966 6599 6600 6601", "disputeid": "13370", "disputecitation": "Dow AgroSciences LLC vs. Government of Canada", "fullcitation": "Dow AgroSciences LLC vs. Government of Canada", "isdisputecitation": "1", "field_respondentstates": "Canada", "field_109": "403", "field_67": "Dow AgroSciences LLC vs. Government of Canada", "field_69": "12324", "field_70": "11086", "field_71": "UN/0098", "field_72": "Dow AgroSciences v. Canada", "field_73": "Dow AgroSciences LLC vs. Government of Canada", "contenttypedatamasterid": "20359 20360 20361", "field_documenttypeid": "1076 1075 1077", "field_137": "True", "field_56": "15272", "field_57": "UN/0098/01 UN/0098/02 UN/0098/03", "field_58": "Notice of Intent Notice of Arbitration Settlement Agreement", "field_59": "Dow AgroSciences v. Canada Notice of Intent Dow AgroSciences v. Canada Notice of Arbitration Dow AgroSciences v. Canada Settlement Agreement", "field_60": "Dow AgroSciences LLC v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Notice of Intent, 25 August 2008 Dow AgroSciences LLC v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Notice of Arbitration, 31 March 2009 Dow AgroSciences LLC v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Settlement Agreement, 25 May 2011", "field_61": "20080825 20090331 20110525", "field_62": "234", "Filename": "db://FE_SelectDisputeViewForContegraSearch#RowId=966" }, "paragraphs": null, "hitCount": 0, "highlightedFields": null }, { "fields": { "rowid": "950 6237 6238 6239 6240 6241 6242 6243 6244 6245 6246 6247 6248 6249 6250 6251 6252 6253 6254 6255 6256 6257 6258 6259 6260 6261 6262 6263 6264 6265 6266 6267 6268 6269 6270 6271 6272 6273 6274 6275 6276 6277 6278 6279 6280 6281 6282 6283 6284 6285 6286 6287 6288 6289 6290 6291 6292 6293 6294 6295 6296 6297 6298 6299 6300 6301 6302 6303 6304 6305 6306 6307 6308 6309 6310 6311 6312 6313 6314 6315 6316 6317 6318 6319 6320 6321 6322 6323 6324 6325 6326 6327 6328 6329 6330 6331 6332", "disputeid": "13353", "disputecitation": "Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada (ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2)", "fullcitation": "Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada (ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2)", "isdisputecitation": "1", "field_respondentstates": "Canada", "field_100": "13721", "field_101": "578", "field_106": "14289", "field_108": "578", "field_109": "403", "field_67": "Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada", "field_68": "ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2", "field_69": "12324", "field_70": "11086", "field_71": "UN/0081", "field_72": "Eli Lilly v. Canada", "field_73": "Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada (ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2)", "field_74": "24218", "field_77": "5445", "field_78": "112", "field_82": "2150", "field_83": "113", "contenttypedatamasterid": "19992 19993 19994 19995 19996 19997 19998 19999 20000 20001 20002 20003 20004 20005 20006 20007 20008 20009 20010 20011 20012 20013 20014 20015 20016 20017 20018 20019 20020 20021 20022 20023 20024 20025 20026 20027 20028 20029 20030 20031 20032 20033 20034 20035 20036 20037 20038 20039 20040 20041 20042 20043 20044 20045 20046 20047 20048 20049 20050 20051 20052 20053 20054 20055 20056 20057 20058 20060 20061 20062 20063 20064 20065 20066 20067 20068 20069 20070 20071 20072 20073 20074 20075 20076 20077 20078 20079 20080 20081 20082 20083 20084 20085 20086 20087 20088", "field_documenttypeid": "1076 1075 1080 1077 1079 1063 1074", "field_137": "True", "field_56": "15255", "field_57": "UN/0081/01 UN/0081/02 UN/0081/03 UN/0081/04 UN/0081/05 UN/0081/06 UN/0081/07 UN/0081/08 UN/0081/09 UN/0081/10 UN/0081/11 UN/0081/12 UN/0081/13 UN/0081/14 UN/0081/15 UN/0081/16 UN/0081/17 UN/0081/18 UN/0081/19 UN/0081/20 UN/0081/21 UN/0081/22 UN/0081/23 UN/0081/24 UN/0081/25 UN/0081/26 UN/0081/27 UN/0081/28 UN/0081/29 UN/0081/30 UN/0081/31 UN/0081/32 UN/0081/33 UN/0081/34 UN/0081/35 UN/0081/36 UN/0081/37 UN/0081/38 UN/0081/39 UN/0081/40 UN/0081/41 UN/0081/42 UN/0081/43 UN/0081/44 UN/0081/45 UN/0081/46 UN/0081/47 UN/0081/48 UN/0081/49 UN/0081/50 UN/0081/51 UN/0081/52 UN/0081/53 UN/0081/54 UN/0081/55 UN/0081/56 UN/0081/57 UN/0081/58 UN/0081/59 UN/0081/60 UN/0081/61 UN/0081/62 UN/0081/63 UN/0081/64 UN/0081/65 UN/0081/66 UN/0081/67 UN/0081/69 UN/0081/70 UN/0081/71 UN/0081/72 UN/0081/73 UN/0081/74 UN/0081/75 UN/0081/76 UN/0081/77 UN/0081/78 UN/0081/79 UN/0081/80 UN/0081/81 UN/0081/82 UN/0081/83 UN/0081/84 UN/0081/85 UN/0081/86 UN/0081/87 UN/0081/88 UN/0081/89 UN/0081/90 UN/0081/91 UN/0081/92 UN/0081/93 UN/0081/94 UN/0081/95 UN/0081/96 UN/0081/97", "field_58": "Notice of Intent Second Notice of Intent Notice of Arbitration Procedural Order No. 1 Confidentiality Order Parties Letter to Tribunal on Procedural Issues Claimant Observations on Outstanding Issues for the First Procedural Hearing Respondent Submission on Procedural Issues Claimant Letter to Tribunal Designating the Notice of Arbitration as Statement of Claim Respondent Statement of Defence Claimant Memorial Respondent Counter Memorial Expert Report of Murray Wilson Witness Statement of Peter George Stringer Witness Statement of Robert Postlethwait Witness Statement of Anne Nobles Expert Report of Gilda Gonzalez Carmona Expert Report of Stephen G. Kunin Expert Report of Fabian Ramon Salazar Expert Report of Jay Erstling Witness Statement of Robert A. Armitage Expert Report of Professor Robert P. Merges Expert Report of Professor Norman V. Siebrasse Expert Report of Daniel J. Gervais Expert Report of Ronald E. Dimock Expert Report of Timothy R. Holbrook Expert Report of Hedwig Lindner Expert Report of T. David Reed Witness Statement of Kimby Barton Witness Statement of Marcel Brisebois Witness Statement of Dr. Michael Gillen Expert Report of Philip Thomas Expert Report of Bruce Levin Reply Expert Report of Murray Wilson Reply Expert Report of Stephen G. Kunin Second Expert Report of Jay Erstling Second Expert Report of Norman V. Siebrasse Second Expert Report of Robert P. Merges Claimant Reply on the Merits Second Witness Statement of Robert A. Armitage Expert Report of Andrew J. Reddon Reply Expert Report of Fabian Ramon Salazar Reply Expert Report of Gilda Gonzalez Carmona Second Expert Report of Timothy R. Holbrook Second Expert Report of T. David Reed Second Expert Report of Daniel J. Gervais Second Expert Report of Hedwig A. Lindner López Second Witness Statement of Marcel Brisebois Second Witness Statement of Michael Gillen Respondent’s Rejoinder on the Merits Procedural Order No. 3 Claimant Opposition to Respondent Jurisdictional Objection Canadian Chamber of Commerce Amicus Curiae Application Canadian Generic Pharmaceutical Association Amicus Curiae Application CIPPIC (Univ of Ottawa) and CIPP (McGill Univ) Amicus Curiae Application Dr. Grosse Ruse-Khan, Dr. Liddell and Dr. Waibel of Univ of Cambridge Amicus Curiae Application Five Intellectual Property Law Scholars Amicus Curiae Application Innovative Medicines Canada and BIOTECanada Amicus Curiae Application National Association of Manufacturers Amicus Curiae Application PhRMA and AMIIF and BIO Amicus Curiae Application Seven Intellectual Property Law Professors Amicus Curiae Application Claimant Observations on Non-Disputing Party Applications Respondent Observations on Non-Disputing Party Applications Procedural Order No. 4 Amicus Curiae submission of Dr. Burcu Kilic, Professor Brook K. Baker, Professor Cynthia Ho and Mr. Yaniv Heled Amicus Curiae submission of Canadian Generic Pharmaceutical Association Amicus Curiae submission of Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic and Centre for Intellectual Property Policy Amicus Curiae submission of Intellectual Property Law Professors Amicus Curiae submission of National Association of Manufacturers Submission of the United States of America Submission of Mexico Pursuant to NAFTA Article 1128 Procedural Order No. 2 Respondent Observations on Issues Raised in 1128 Submissions Respondent Observations on Issues Raised in Amicus Submissions Claimant Observations on Issues Raised in 1128 and Amicus Submissions Procedural Order No. 5 Procedural Order No. 6 United States Supplemental 1128 Submission Hearing on Jurisdiction and the Merits Transcript Day 1 Hearing on Jurisdiction and the Merits Transcript Day 2 Hearing on Jurisdiction and the Merits Transcript Day 3 Hearing on Jurisdiction and the Merits Transcript Day 4 Hearing on Jurisdiction and the Merits Transcript Day 5 Hearing on Jurisdiction and the Merits Transcript Day 6 Hearing on Jurisdiction and the Merits Transcript Day 7 Hearing on Jurisdiction and the Merits Transcript Day 8 Claimant Post-Hearing Brief Respondent Post-Hearing Brief Respondent Post-Hearing Brief – Annex A Claimant Reply on Post-Hearing Brief Respondent Reply on Post-Hearing Brief Claimant Submission on Costs Respondent Submission on Costs Final Award", "field_59": "Eli Lilly v. Canada Notice of Intent Eli Lilly v. Canada Second Notice of Intent Eli Lilly v. Canada Notice of Arbitration Eli Lilly v. Canada Procedural Order No. 1 Eli Lilly v. Canada Confidentiality Order Eli Lilly v. Canada Parties Letter to Tribunal on Procedural Issues Eli Lilly v. Canada Claimant Observations on Outstanding Issues for the First Procedural Hearing Eli Lilly v. Canada Respondent Submission on Procedural Issues Eli Lilly v. Canada Claimant Letter to Tribunal Designating the Notice of Arbitration as Statement of Claim Eli Lilly v. Canada Respondent Statement of Defence Eli Lilly v. Canada Claimant Memorial Eli Lilly v. Canada Respondent Counter Memorial Eli Lilly v. Canada Expert Report of Murray Wilson Eli Lilly v. Canada Witness Statement of Peter George Stringer Eli Lilly v. Canada Witness Statement of Robert Postlethwait Eli Lilly v. Canada Witness Statement of Anne Nobles Eli Lilly v. Canada Expert Report of Gilda Gonzalez Carmona Eli Lilly v. Canada Expert Report of Stephen G. Kunin Eli Lilly v. Canada Expert Report of Fabian Ramon Salazar Eli Lilly v. Canada Expert Report of Jay Erstling Eli Lilly v. Canada Witness Statement of Robert A. Armitage Eli Lilly v. Canada Expert Report of Professor Robert P. Merges Eli Lilly v. Canada Expert Report of Professor Norman V. Siebrasse Eli Lilly v. Canada Expert Report of Daniel J. Gervais Eli Lilly v. Canada Expert Report of Ronald E. Dimock Eli Lilly v. Canada Expert Report of Timothy R. Holbrook Eli Lilly v. Canada Expert Report of Hedwig Lindner Eli Lilly v. Canada Expert Report of T. David Reed Eli Lilly v. Canada Witness Statement of Kimby Barton Eli Lilly v. Canada Witness Statement of Marcel Brisebois Eli Lilly v. Canada Witness Statement of Dr. Michael Gillen Eli Lilly v. Canada Expert Report of Philip Thomas Eli Lilly v. Canada Expert Report of Bruce Levin Eli Lilly v. Canada Reply Expert Report of Murray Wilson Eli Lilly v. Canada Reply Expert Report of Stephen G. Kunin Eli Lilly v. Canada Second Expert Report of Jay Erstling Eli Lilly v. Canada Second Expert Report of Norman V. Siebrasse Eli Lilly v. Canada Second Expert Report of Robert P. Merges Eli Lilly v. Canada Claimant Reply on the Merits Eli Lilly v. Canada Second Witness Statement of Robert A. Armitage Eli Lilly v. Canada Expert Report of Andrew J. Reddon Eli Lilly v. Canada Reply Expert Report of Fabian Ramon Salazar Eli Lilly v. Canada Reply Expert Report of Gilda Gonzalez Carmona Eli Lilly v. Canada Second Expert Report of Timothy R. Holbrook Eli Lilly v. Canada Second Expert Report of T. David Reed Eli Lilly v. Canada Second Expert Report of Daniel J. Gervais Eli Lilly v. Canada Second Expert Report of Hedwig A. Lindner López Eli Lilly v. Canada Second Witness Statement of Marcel Brisebois Eli Lilly v. Canada Second Witness Statement of Michael Gillen Eli Lilly v. Canada Respondent’s Rejoinder on the Merits Eli Lilly v. Canada Procedural Order No. 3 Eli Lilly v. Canada Claimant Opposition to Respondent Jurisdictional Objection Eli Lilly v. Canada Canadian Chamber of Commerce Amicus Curiae Application Eli Lilly v. Canada Canadian Generic Pharmaceutical Association Amicus Curiae Application Eli Lilly v. Canada CIPPIC (Univ of Ottawa) and CIPP (McGill Univ) Amicus Curiae Application Eli Lilly v. Canada Dr. Grosse Ruse-Khan, Dr. Liddell and Dr. Waibel of Univ of Cambridge Amicus Curiae Application Eli Lilly v. Canada Five Intellectual Property Law Scholars Amicus Curiae Application Eli Lilly v. Canada Innovative Medicines Canada and BIOTECanada Amicus Curiae Application Eli Lilly v. Canada National Association of Manufacturers Amicus Curiae Application Eli Lilly v. Canada PhRMA and AMIIF and BIO Amicus Curiae Application Eli Lilly v. Canada Seven Intellectual Property Law Professors Amicus Curiae Application Eli Lilly v. Canada Claimant Observations on Non-Disputing Party Applications Eli Lilly v. Canada Respondent Observations on Non-Disputing Party Applications Eli Lilly v. Canada Procedural Order No. 4 Eli Lilly v. Canada Amicus Curiae submission of Dr. Burcu Kilic, Professor Brook K. Baker, Professor Cynthia Ho and Mr. Yaniv Heled Eli Lilly v. Canada Amicus Curiae submission of Canadian Generic Pharmaceutical Association Eli Lilly v. Canada Amicus Curiae submission of Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic and Centre for Intellectual Property Policy Eli Lilly v. Canada Amicus Curiae submission of Intellectual Property Law Professors Eli Lilly v. Canada Amicus Curiae submission of National Association of Manufacturers Eli Lilly v. Canada Submission of the United States of America Eli Lilly v. Canada Submission of Mexico Pursuant to NAFTA Article 1128 Eli Lilly v. Canada Procedural Order No. 2 Eli Lilly v. Canada Respondent Observations on Issues Raised in 1128 Submissions Eli Lilly v. Canada Respondent Observations on Issues Raised in Amicus Submissions Eli Lilly v. Canada Claimant Observations on Issues Raised in 1128 and Amicus Submissions Eli Lilly v. Canada Procedural Order No. 5 Eli Lilly v. Canada Procedural Order No. 6 Eli Lilly v. Canada United States Supplemental 1128 Submission Eli Lilly v. Canada Hearing on Jurisdiction and the Merits Transcript Day 1 Eli Lilly v. Canada Hearing on Jurisdiction and the Merits Transcript Day 2 Eli Lilly v. Canada Hearing on Jurisdiction and the Merits Transcript Day 3 Eli Lilly v. Canada Hearing on Jurisdiction and the Merits Transcript Day 4 Eli Lilly v. Canada Hearing on Jurisdiction and the Merits Transcript Day 5 Eli Lilly v. Canada Hearing on Jurisdiction and the Merits Transcript Day 6 Eli Lilly v. Canada Hearing on Jurisdiction and the Merits Transcript Day 7 Eli Lilly v. Canada Hearing on Jurisdiction and the Merits Transcript Day 8 Eli Lilly v. Canada Claimant Post-Hearing Brief Eli Lilly v. Canada Respondent Post-Hearing Brief Eli Lilly v. Canada Respondent Post-Hearing Brief – Annex A Eli Lilly v. Canada Claimant Reply on Post-Hearing Brief Eli Lilly v. Canada Respondent Reply on Post-Hearing Brief Eli Lilly v. Canada Claimant Submission on Costs Eli Lilly v. Canada Respondent Submission on Costs Eli Lilly v. Canada Final Award", "field_60": "Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, Notice of Intent, 7 November 2012 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, Second Notice of Intent, 13 June 2013 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, Notice of Arbitration, 12 September 2013 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Procedural Order No. 1, 26 May 2014 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Confidentiality Order, 26 May 2014 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Parties Letter to Tribunal on Procedural Issues, 14 April 2014 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Claimant Observations on Outstanding Issues for the First Procedural Hearing, 2 May 2014 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Respondent Submission on Procedural Issues, 2 May 2014 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Claimant Letter to Tribunal Designating the Notice of Arbitration as Statement of Claim, 14 May 2014 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Respondent Statement of Defence, 30 June 2014 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Claimant Memorial, 29 September, 2014 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Respondent Counter Memorial, 27 January 2015 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Expert Report of Murray Wilson, 25 September 2014 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Witness Statement of Peter George Stringer, 25 September 2014 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Witness Statement of Robert Postlethwait, 25 September 2014 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Witness Statement of Anne Nobles, 25 September 2014 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Expert Report of Gilda Gonzalez Carmona, 26 September 2014 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Expert Report of Stephen G. Kunin, 26 September 2014 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Expert Report of Fabian Ramon Salazar, 26 September 2014 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Expert Report of Jay Erstling, 27 September 2014 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Witness Statement of Robert A. Armitage, 27 September 2014 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Expert Report of Professor P. Merges, 29 September 2014 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Expert Report of Professor Norman V. Siebrasse, 29 September 2014 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Expert Report of Daniel J. Gervais, 23 January 2015 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Expert Report of Ronald E. Dimock, 26 January 2015 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Expert Report of Timothy R. Holbrook, 26 January 2015 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Expert Report of Hedwig Lindner, 26 January 2015 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Expert Report of T. David Reed, 26 January 2015 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Witness Statement of Kimby Barton, 26 January 2015 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Witness Statement of Marcel Brisebois, 26 January 2015 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Witness Statement of Dr. Michael Gillen, 26 January 2015 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Expert Report of Philip Thomas, 7 September 2015 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Expert Report of Bruce Levin, 7 September 2015 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Reply Expert Report of Murray Wilson, 9 September 2015 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Reply Expert Report of Stephen G. Kunin, 9 September 2015 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Second Expert Report of Jay Erstling, 10 September 2015 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Second Expert Report of Norman V. Siebrasse, 10 September 2015 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Second Expert Report of Robert P. Merges, 10 September 2015 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Claimant Reply on the Merits, 11 September 2015 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Second Witness Statement of Robert A. Armitage, 11 September 2015 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Expert Report of Andrew J. Reddon, 11 September 2015 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Reply Expert Report of Fabian Ramon Salazar, 10 September 2015 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Reply Expert Report of Gilda Gonzalez Carmona, 10 September 2015 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Expert Report of Ronald E. Dimock, 4 December 2015 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Second Expert Report of Timothy R. Holbrook, 5 December 2015 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Second Expert Report of T. David Reed, 7 December 2015 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Second Expert Report of Daniel J. Gervais, 7 December 2015 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Second Expert Report of Hedwig A. Lindner López, 7 December 2015 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Second Witness Statement of Marcel Brisebois, 7 December 2015 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Second Witness Statement of Michael Gillen, 7 December 2015 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Respondent Rejoinder on the Merits, 8 December 2015 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Second Expert Report of Hedwig A. Lindner López, 7 December 2015 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Procedural Order No. 3, 15 January 2016 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Claimant Opposition to Respondent Jurisdictional Objection, 22 January 2016 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Canadian Chamber of Commerce Amicus Curiae Application, 12 February 2016 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Canadian Generic Pharmaceutical Association Amicus Curiae Application, 12 February 2016 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, CIPPIC (Univ of Ottawa) and CIPP (McGill Univ) Amicus Curiae Application, 12 February 2016 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Dr. Grosse Ruse-Khan, Dr. Liddell and Dr. Waibel of Univ of Cambridge Amicus Curiae Application, 12 February 2016 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Five Intellectual Property Law Scholars Amicus Curiae Application, 12 February 2016 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, Innovative Medicines Canada and BIOTECanada Amicus Curiae Application, 12 February 2016 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, National Association of Manufacturers Amicus Curiae Application, 12 February 2016 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/14/2, PhRMA and AMIIF and BIO Amicus Curiae Application, 12 February 2016 Eli Lilly and Company v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UN", "field_61": "20121107 20130613 20130912 20140526 20140414 20140502 20140514 20140630 20140929 20150127 20140925 20140926 20140927 20150123 20150126 20150907 20150909 20150910 20150911 20151204 20151205 20151207 20151208 20160115 20160122 20160212 20160219 20160223 20160318 20150406 20160422 20160429 20160527 20160608 20160530 20160531 20160601 20160602 20160603 20160604 20160606 20160725 20160808 20160822 20170316", "field_62": "234 249", "Filename": "db://FE_SelectDisputeViewForContegraSearch#RowId=950", "field_102": "2930,3718,4851,4852,4853,5640,5642,5644,5648,5650,5654,5656,5658,5660,5662,7840", "field_103": "853,853,1065,1065,853,1065,853,853,853,853,853,853,853,853,1478,853", "field_104": "3269,4854,4855,5462,5647,5664,5666,8070,8071,8073,8076", "field_105": "900,900,900,900,900,900,900,900,900,900,900" }, "paragraphs": null, "hitCount": 0, "highlightedFields": null }, { "fields": { "rowid": "876 4773 4774 4775 4776 4777 4778 4779 4780 4781 4782 4783 4784 4785 4786 4787 4788 4789 4790 4791 4792 4793 4794 4795", "disputeid": "13279", "disputecitation": "Ethyl Corporation v. Government of Canada", "fullcitation": "Ethyl Corporation v. Government of Canada", "disputestartdate": "19970414", "isdisputecitation": "1", "modifiedon": "20210205", "field_respondentstates": "Canada", "field_100": "13643", "field_101": "578", "field_106": "14297", "field_108": "403", "field_109": "403", "field_110": "19970414", "field_145": "332", "field_67": "Ethyl Corporation v. Government of Canada", "field_69": "12324", "field_70": "11086", "field_71": "UN/0007", "field_72": "Ethyl v. Canada", "field_73": "Ethyl Corporation v. Government of Canada", "field_74": "1821", "field_77": "2327", "field_78": "112", "field_82": "1841", "field_83": "113", "contenttypedatamasterid": "18485 18486 18487 18488 18489 18490 18491 18492 18493 18494 18495 18496 18497 18498 18499 18500 18501 18502 18503 18504 18505 18506 18507", "field_documenttypeid": "1074 1072 1080 1076 1075 1079", "field_137": "True", "field_56": "15181", "field_57": "UN/0007/01 UN/0007/02 UN/0007/03 UN/0007/04 UN/0007/05 UN/0007/06 UN/0007/07 UN/0007/08 UN/0007/09 UN/0007/10 UN/0007/11 UN/0007/12 UN/0007/13 UN/0007/14 UN/0007/15 UN/0007/16 UN/0007/17 UN/0007/18 UN/0007/19 UN/0007/20 UN/0007/21 UN/0007/22 UN/0007/23", "field_58": "Award on Jurisdiction Decision on place of arbitration Procedural Order Procedural Order - Decision on Place of Arbitration Notice of Intent Notice of Arbitration Respondent Submission on Place of Arbitration Claimant Statement of Claim Respondent Statement of Defense", "field_59": "Ethyl v. Canada Award on Jurisdiction Ethyl v. Canada Decision on place of arbitration Ethyl v. Canada Procedural Order Ethyl v. Canada Procedural Order - Decision on Place of Arbitration Ethyl v. Canada Notice of Intent Ethyl v. Canada Notice of Arbitration Ethyl v. Canada Respondent Submission on Place of Arbitration Ethyl v. Canada Claimant Statement of Claim Ethyl v. Canada Respondent Statement of Defense", "field_60": "Ethyl Corporation v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Award on Jurisdiction, 24 June 1998 Ethyl Corporation v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Decision Regarding the Place of Arbitration, 28 November 1997 Ethyl Corporation v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Procedural Order Ethyl Corporation v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Procedural Order, 13 October 1997 Ethyl Corporation v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Procedural Order - Decision Regarding the Place of Arbitration, 1 December 1997. Ethyl Corporation v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Procedural Order, 18 December 1997 Ethyl Corporation v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Procedural Order, 22 September 1997 Ethyl Corporation v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Procedural Order, 3 July 1998 Ethyl Corporation v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Procedural Order, 8 July 1998 Ethyl Corporation v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Procedural Order, 10 July 1998 Ethyl Corporation v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Procedural Order, 21 July 1998 Ethyl Corporation v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Procedural Order, 21 September 1998 Ethyl Corporation v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Procedural Order, 9 November 1998 Ethyl Corporation v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Procedural Order, 21 September 1997 Ethyl Corporation v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Procedural Order, 22 January 1998 Ethyl Corporation v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Procedural Order, 26 January 1998 Ethyl Corporation v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Procedural Order, 16 March 1998 Ethyl Corporation v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Procedural Order, 25 June 1998 Ethyl Corporation v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Notice of Intent, 10 September 1996 Ethyl Corporation v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Notice of Arbitration, 14 April 1997 Ethyl Corporation v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Respondent Submission on Place of Arbitration, 2 October 1997 Ethyl Corporation v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Claimant Statement of Claim, 2 October 1997 Ethyl Corporation v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Respondent Statement of Defense, 27 November 1997", "field_61": "19980624 19971128 19971013 19971201 19971218 19970922 19980703 19980708 19980710 19980721 19980921 19981109 19970921 19980122 19980126 19980316 19980625 19960910 19970414 19971002 19971127", "field_62": "234", "Filename": "db://FE_SelectDisputeViewForContegraSearch#RowId=876", "field_102": "2413,8168,8170,8171,25981,25982", "field_103": "652,1755,25984,652,25980,25980", "field_104": "7747,8116,8172,8173,25983,8124,25986,25988,25989,25990,25992", "field_105": "760,889,886,1755,886,25985,886,25987,886,889,886" }, "paragraphs": null, "hitCount": 0, "highlightedFields": null }, { "fields": { "rowid": "1032 7221 7222", "disputeid": "13436", "disputecitation": "GL Farms LLC and Carl Adams v. Government of Canada", "fullcitation": "GL Farms LLC and Carl Adams v. Government of Canada", "isdisputecitation": "1", "field_respondentstates": "Canada", "field_109": "403", "field_67": "GL Farms LLC and Carl Adams v. Government of Canada", "field_69": "12324", "field_70": "11086", "field_71": "UN/0164", "field_72": "GL Farms v. Canada", "field_73": "GL Farms LLC and Carl Adams v. Government of Canada", "contenttypedatamasterid": "20985 20986", "field_documenttypeid": "1076 1075", "field_137": "True", "field_56": "15338", "field_57": "UN/0164/01 UN/0164/02", "field_58": "Notice of Intent Notice of Arbitration", "field_59": "GL Farms v. Canada Notice of Intent GL Farms v. Canada Notice of Arbitration", "field_60": "GL Farms LLC and Carl Adams v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Notice of Intent, 28 February 2006 GL Farms LLC and Carl Adams v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Notice of Arbitration, 5 June 2006", "field_61": "20060228 20060605", "field_62": "234", "Filename": "db://FE_SelectDisputeViewForContegraSearch#RowId=1032" }, "paragraphs": null, "hitCount": 0, "highlightedFields": null }, { "fields": { "rowid": "333 2834 2835 2836 2837 2838 2839 2840 2841 2842 2843 2844 2845 2846 2847 2848 2849 2850 2851 2852 2853", "disputeid": "12734", "disputecitation": "Global Telecom Holding S.A.E. v. Government of Canada (ICSID Case No. ARB/16/16)", "fullcitation": "Global Telecom Holding S.A.E. v. Government of Canada (ICSID Case No. ARB/16/16)", "disputestartdate": "20160606", "isdisputecitation": "1", "field_respondentstates": "Canada", "field_100": "13231", "field_101": "427", "field_106": "14287", "field_108": "438", "field_109": "403", "field_110": "20160606", "field_67": "Global Telecom Holding S.A.E. v. Government of Canada", "field_68": "ICSID Case No. ARB/16/16", "field_69": "11388", "field_70": "11072", "field_71": "IC/0261", "field_72": "Global Telecom v. Canada", "field_73": "Global Telecom Holding S.A.E. v. Government of Canada (ICSID Case No. ARB/16/16)", "field_74": "2228", "field_77": "5445", "field_78": "112", "field_82": "1844", "field_83": "113", "contenttypedatamasterid": "16527 16528 16529 16530 16531 16532 16533 16534 16535 16536 16537 16538 16539 16540 16541 16542 16543 16544 16545 16546", "field_documenttypeid": "1077 1080 1074 1081 1079", "field_137": "True", "field_56": "14636", "field_57": "IC/0261/01 IC/0261/02 IC/0261/03 IC/0261/04 IC/0261/05 IC/0261/06 IC/0261/07 IC/0261/08 IC/0261/09 IC/0261/10 IC/0261/11 IC/0261/12 IC/0261/13 IC/0261/14 IC/0261/15 IC/0261/16 IC/0261/17 IC/0261/18 IC/0261/19 IC/0261/20", "field_58": "Claimant Press Release re Request for Arbitration Procedural Order No. 1 Procedural Order No. 3 Decision on the Parties Requests for Document Production Procedural Order No. 2 Decision on Respondent Request for Bifurcation Procedural Order No. 4 Decision on the Claimant Objections to the Respondent Claims of Privilege [Redacted] Procedural Order No. 7 on Hearing Organization Procedural Order No. 9 Decision on Claimant Request of 18 March 2019 Procedural Order No. 5 Decision on Outstanding Issues of Legal Privilege [Redacted] Procedural Order No. 6 Decision on Common Interest Privilege, Limited Waiver of Privilege and Subject Matter Waiver of Privilege [Redacted] Procedural Order No. 8 Independent Expert Assessment on Privilege [Redacted] Procedural Order No. 10 Decision on Claimant Request of 21 November 2019 [Redacted] Award [Redacted] Dissenting Opinion of Gary Born [Redacted] Claimant Reply on Merits and Damages & Counter-Memorial on Jurisdiction and Admissibility [Redacted] Respondent Rejoinder on Merits and Damages and Reply on Jurisdiction and Admissibility [Redacted] Claimant Rejoinder on Jurisdiction and Admissibility [Redacted] Respondent Memorial on Jurisdiction and Admissibility and Request for Bifurcation [Redacted] Respondent Counter-Memorial on Merits & Damages [Redacted] Claimant Memorial on the Merits and Damages [Redacted] Confidentiality Order", "field_59": "Global Telecom v. Canada Claimant Press Release re Request for Arbitration Global Telecom v. Canada Procedural Order No. 1 Global Telecom v. Canada Procedural Order No. 3 Decision on the Parties Requests for Document Production Global Telecom v. Canada Procedural Order No. 2 Decision on Respondent Request for Bifurcation Global Telecom v. Canada Procedural Order No. 4 Decision on the Claimant Objections to the Respondent Claims of Privilege [Redacted] Global Telecom v. Canada Procedural Order No. 7 on Hearing Organization Global Telecom v. Canada Procedural Order No. 9 Decision on Claimant Request of 18 March 2019 Global Telecom v. Canada Procedural Order No. 5 Decision on Outstanding Issues of Legal Privilege [Redacted] Global Telecom v. Canada Procedural Order No. 6 Decision on Common Interest Privilege, Limited Waiver of Privilege and Subject Matter Waiver of Privilege [Redacted] Global Telecom v. Canada Procedural Order No. 8 Independent Expert Assessment on Privilege [Redacted] Global Telecom v. Canada Procedural Order No. 10 Decision on Claimant Request of 21 November 2019 [Redacted] Global Telecom v. Canada Award [Redacted] Global Telecom v. Canada Dissenting Opinion of Gary Born [Redacted] Global Telecom v. Canada Claimant Reply on Merits and Damages & Counter-Memorial on Jurisdiction and Admissibility [Redacted] Global Telecom v. Canada Respondent Rejoinder on Merits and Damages and Reply on Jurisdiction and Admissibility [Redacted] Global Telecom v. Canada Claimant Rejoinder on Jurisdiction and Admissibility [Redacted] Global Telecom v. Canada Respondent Memorial on Jurisdiction and Admissibility and Request for Bifurcation [Redacted] Global Telecom v. Canada Respondent Counter-Memorial on Merits & Damages [Redacted] Global Telecom v. Canada Claimant Memorial on the Merits and Damages [Redacted] Global Telecom v. Canada Confidentiality Order", "field_60": "Global Telecom Holding S.A.E. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/16/16, Claimant Press Release re Request for Arbitration, 12 June 2016 Global Telecom Holding S.A.E. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/16/16, Procedural Order No. 1, 13 June 2017 Global Telecom Holding S.A.E. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/16/16, Procedural Order No. 3 Decision on the Parties Requests for Document Production, 1 June 2018 Global Telecom Holding S.A.E. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/16/16, Procedural Order No. 2 Decision on Respondent Request for Bifurcation, 14 December 2017 Global Telecom Holding S.A.E. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/16/16, Procedural Order No. 4 Decision on the Claimant Objections to the Respondent Claims of Privilege, 3 November 2018 [Redacted] Global Telecom Holding S.A.E. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/16/16, Procedural Order No. 7 on Hearing Organization, 14 March 2019 Global Telecom Holding S.A.E. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/16/16, Procedural Order No. 9 Decision on Claimant Request of 18 March 2019, 25 March 2019 Global Telecom Holding S.A.E. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/16/16, Procedural Order No. 5 Decision on Outstanding Issues of Legal Privilege, 13 December 2018 [Redacted] Global Telecom Holding S.A.E. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/16/16, Procedural Order No. 6 Decision on Common Interest Privilege, Limited Waiver of Privilege and Subject Matter Waiver of Privilege, 18 January 2019 [Redacted] Global Telecom Holding S.A.E. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/16/16, Procedural Order No. 8 Independent Expert Assessment on Privilege, 14 March 2019 [Redacted] Global Telecom Holding S.A.E. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/16/16, Procedural Order No. 10 Decision on Claimant Request of 21 November 2019, 8 December 2019 [Redacted] Global Telecom Holding S.A.E. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/16/16, Award, 27 March 2020 [Redacted] Global Telecom Holding S.A.E. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/16/16, Dissenting Opinion of Gary Born, 27 March 2020 [Redacted] Global Telecom Holding S.A.E. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/16/16, Claimant Reply on Merits and Damages & Counter-Memorial on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 5 November 2018 [Redacted] Global Telecom Holding S.A.E. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/16/16, Respondent Rejoinder on Merits and Damages and Reply on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 3 February 2019 [Redacted] Global Telecom Holding S.A.E. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/16/16, Claimant Rejoinder on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 5 March 2019 [Redacted] Global Telecom Holding S.A.E. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/16/16, Respondent Memorial on Jurisdiction and Admissibility and Request for Bifurcation, 15 November 2017 [Redacted] Global Telecom Holding S.A.E. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/16/16, Respondent Counter-Memorial on Merits & Damages, 26 February 2018 [Redacted] Global Telecom Holding S.A.E. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/16/16, Claimant Memorial on the Merits and Damages, 29 September 2017 [Redacted] Global Telecom Holding S.A.E. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/16/16, Confidentiality Order, 30 October 2017", "field_61": "20160612 20170613 20180601 20171214 20181103 20190314 20190325 20181213 20190118 20191208 20200327 20181105 20190203 20190305 20171115 20180226 20170929 20171030", "field_62": "234", "Filename": "db://FE_SelectDisputeViewForContegraSearch#RowId=333", "field_102": "3778,6632,6633,6637,7414,7471,7490,7553,7573,7596,8177", "field_103": "1033,1033,1033,1033,1033,1033,1033,1033,1769,1769,1033", "field_104": "3379,3380,4460,4855,5408,5412,5664,7462,7508,7537,7603,8071", "field_105": "900,900,900,900,900,900,900,900,900,900,1138,900", "field_150": "18466 18465", "field_85": "2249", "field_86": "2235", "field_87": "2235" }, "paragraphs": null, "hitCount": 0, "highlightedFields": null }, { "fields": { "rowid": "957 6400 6401 6402", "disputeid": "13361", "disputecitation": "JML Heirs, LLC and J.M. Longyear, LLC v. Government of Canada", "fullcitation": "JML Heirs, LLC and J.M. Longyear, LLC v. Government of Canada", "isdisputecitation": "1", "field_respondentstates": "Canada", "field_109": "403", "field_67": "JML Heirs, LLC and J.M. Longyear, LLC v. Government of Canada", "field_69": "12324", "field_71": "UN/0089", "field_72": "Longyear v. Canada", "field_73": "JML Heirs, LLC and J.M. Longyear, LLC v. Government of Canada", "contenttypedatamasterid": "20156 20157 20158", "field_documenttypeid": "1076 1075 1077", "field_137": "True", "field_56": "15263", "field_57": "UN/0089/01 UN/0089/02 UN/0089/03", "field_58": "Notice of Intent Notice of Arbitration Notice of Withdrawal of Claim", "field_59": "Longyear v. Canada Notice of Intent Longyear v. Canada Notice of Arbitration Longyear v. Canada Notice of Withdrawal of Claim", "field_60": "JML Heirs, LLC and J.M. Longyear, LLC v. Government of Canada, Notice of Intent, 14 February 2014 JML Heirs, LLC and J.M. Longyear, LLC v. Government of Canada, Notice of Arbitration, 20 May 2014 [Redacted] JML Heirs, LLC and J.M. Longyear, LLC v. Government of Canada, Notice of Withdrawal of Claim, 26 June 2015", "field_61": "20140214 20140520 20150626", "field_62": "234", "Filename": "db://FE_SelectDisputeViewForContegraSearch#RowId=957" }, "paragraphs": null, "hitCount": 0, "highlightedFields": null }, { "fields": { "rowid": "932 5928", "disputeid": "13335", "disputecitation": "John R. Andre v. Government of Canada", "fullcitation": "John R. Andre v. Government of Canada", "isdisputecitation": "1", "field_respondentstates": "Canada", "field_109": "403", "field_67": "John R. Andre v. Government of Canada", "field_69": "12324", "field_71": "UN/0063", "field_72": "Andre v. Canada", "field_73": "John R. Andre v. Government of Canada", "contenttypedatamasterid": "19683", "field_documenttypeid": "1076", "field_137": "True", "field_56": "15237", "field_57": "UN/0063/01", "field_58": "Notice of Intent", "field_59": "Andre v. Canada Notice of Intent", "field_60": "John R. Andre v. Government of Canada, Notice of Intent, 19 March 2010", "field_61": "20100319", "field_62": "234", "Filename": "db://FE_SelectDisputeViewForContegraSearch#RowId=932" }, "paragraphs": null, "hitCount": 0, "highlightedFields": null }, { "fields": { "rowid": "1060 7433", "disputeid": "13464", "disputecitation": "Jonathan Levy v. Government of Canada", "fullcitation": "Jonathan Levy v. Government of Canada", "isdisputecitation": "1", "field_respondentstates": "Canada", "field_109": "403", "field_67": "Jonathan Levy v. Government of Canada", "field_69": "12324", "field_71": "UN/0193", "field_72": "Levy v. Canada", "field_73": "Jonathan Levy v. Government of Canada", "contenttypedatamasterid": "21199", "field_documenttypeid": "1076", "field_137": "True", "field_56": "15366", "field_57": "UN/0193/01", "field_58": "Notice of Intent", "field_59": "Levy v. Canada Notice of Intent", "field_60": "Jonathan Levy v. Government of Canada, Notice of Intent, 16 February 2019", "field_61": "20190216", "field_62": "234", "Filename": "db://FE_SelectDisputeViewForContegraSearch#RowId=1060" }, "paragraphs": null, "hitCount": 0, "highlightedFields": null }, { "fields": { "rowid": "949 6207 6208 6209 6210 6211 6212 6213 6214 6215 6216 6217 6218 6219 6220 6221 6222 6223 6224 6225 6226 6227 6228 6229 6230 6231 6232 6233 6234 6235 6236", "disputeid": "13352", "disputecitation": "Lone Pine Resources Inc. v. Government of Canada (ICSID Case No. UNCT/15/2)", "fullcitation": "Lone Pine Resources Inc. v. Government of Canada (ICSID Case No. UNCT/15/2)", "isdisputecitation": "1", "field_respondentstates": "Canada", "field_100": "13720", "field_101": "578", "field_106": "14285", "field_108": "403", "field_109": "403", "field_67": "Lone Pine Resources Inc. v. Government of Canada", "field_68": "ICSID Case No. UNCT/15/2", "field_69": "12324", "field_70": "11090", "field_71": "UN/0080", "field_72": "Lone Pine Resources v. Canada", "field_73": "Lone Pine Resources Inc. v. Government of Canada (ICSID Case No. UNCT/15/2)", "field_74": "24218", "field_77": "7747", "field_78": "112", "field_82": "7989", "field_83": "113", "contenttypedatamasterid": "19962 19963 19964 19965 19966 19967 19968 19969 19970 19971 19972 19973 19974 19975 19976 19977 19978 19979 19980 19981 19982 19983 19984 19985 19986 19987 19988 19989 19990 19991", "field_documenttypeid": "1076 1075 1079 1080 1063 1077", "field_137": "True", "field_56": "15254", "field_57": "UN/0080/01 UN/0080/02 UN/0080/03 UN/0080/04 UN/0080/05 UN/0080/06 UN/0080/07 UN/0080/08 UN/0080/09 UN/0080/10 UN/0080/11 UN/0080/12 UN/0080/13 UN/0080/14 UN/0080/15 UN/0080/16 UN/0080/17 UN/0080/18 UN/0080/19 UN/0080/20 UN/0080/22 UN/0080/23 UN/0080/24 UN/0080/25 UN/0080/26 UN/0080/27 UN/0080/28 UN/0080/29 UN/0080/30 UN/0080/31", "field_58": "Notice of Intent Notice of Arbitration Response to Notice of Arbitration Procedural Order on Two Disputed Issues Procedural Order No. 1 Confidentiality Order Claimant Memorial Respondent Counter Memorial Procedural Order on Disputed Document Requests Procedural Order No. 2 Procedural Order on Withheld and Redacted Documentation Procedural Order on the Claimant Applications dated 31 March 2017 and 27 April 2017 Procedural Order No. 3 Claimant Reply Procedural Order No. 4 Procedural Order No. 5 Application for Leave to File an Amicus Curiae Submitted by Mr. Muhammad Muzahidul Islam Application for Leave to File an Amicus Curiae Submitted by the Quebec Environmental Law Centre (CQDE) NAFTA Article 1128 Submission of United Mexican States NAFTA Article 1128 Submission of United States of America Amicus Curiae Submission of the Quebec Environmental Law Centre (CQDE) Procedural Order on Amici Applications for Leave to File Non-Disputing Party Submissions Procedural Order No. 6 Procedural Order No. 7 Claimant Observations on Non-Disputing Party Applications Respondent Observations on Non-Disputing Party Applications Respondent Rejoinder Claimant Observations on NAFTA Article 1128 Submissions Respondent Observations on NAFTA Article 1128 Submissions Claimant Response to Amicus Curiae Submission of the Quebec Environmental Law Centre (CQDE)", "field_59": "Lone Pine Resources v. Canada Notice of Intent Lone Pine Resources v. Canada Notice of Arbitration Lone Pine Resources v. Canada Response to Notice of Arbitration Lone Pine Resources v. Canada Procedural Order on Two Disputed Issues Lone Pine Resources v. Canada Procedural Order No. 1 Lone Pine Resources v. Canada Confidentiality Order Lone Pine Resources v. Canada Claimant Memorial Lone Pine Resources v. Canada Respondent Counter Memorial Lone Pine Resources v. Canada Procedural Order on Disputed Document Requests Lone Pine Resources v. Canada Procedural Order No. 2 Lone Pine Resources v. Canada Procedural Order on Withheld and Redacted Documentation Lone Pine Resources v. Canada Procedural Order on the Claimant Applications dated 31 March 2017 and 27 April 2017 Lone Pine Resources v. Canada Procedural Order No. 3 Lone Pine Resources v. Canada Claimant Reply Lone Pine Resources v. Canada Procedural Order No. 4 Lone Pine Resources v. Canada Procedural Order No. 5 Lone Pine Resources v. Canada Application for Leave to File an Amicus Curiae Submitted by Mr. Muhammad Muzahidul Islam Lone Pine Resources v. Canada Application for Leave to File an Amicus Curiae Submitted by the Quebec Environmental Law Centre (CQDE) Lone Pine Resources v. Canada NAFTA Article 1128 Submission of United Mexican States Lone Pine Resources v. Canada NAFTA Article 1128 Submission of United States of America Lone Pine Resources v. Canada Amicus Curiae Submission of the Quebec Environmental Law Centre (CQDE) Lone Pine Resources v. Canada Procedural Order on Amici Applications for Leave to File Non-Disputing Party Submissions Lone Pine Resources v. Canada Procedural Order No. 6 Lone Pine Resources v. Canada Procedural Order No. 7 Lone Pine Resources v. Canada Claimant Observations on Non-Disputing Party Applications Lone Pine Resources v. Canada Respondent Observations on Non-Disputing Party Applications Lone Pine Resources v. Canada Respondent Rejoinder Lone Pine Resources v. Canada Claimant Observations on NAFTA Article 1128 Submissions Lone Pine Resources v. Canada Respondent Observations on NAFTA Article 1128 Submissions Lone Pine Resources v. Canada Claimant Response to Amicus Curiae Submission of the Quebec Environmental Law Centre (CQDE)", "field_60": "Lone Pine Resources Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/15/2, Notice of Intent, 8 November 2012 Lone Pine Resources Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/15/2, Notice of Arbitration, 6 September 2013 Lone Pine Resources Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/15/2, Response to Notice of Arbitration, 27 February 2015 [French] Lone Pine Resources Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/15/2, Procedural Order on Two Disputed Issues, 6 February 2015 Lone Pine Resources Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/15/2, Procedural Order No. 1, 11 March 2015 Lone Pine Resources Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/15/2, Confidentiality Order, 11 March 2015 Lone Pine Resources Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/15/2, Claimant Memorial, 10 April 2015 Lone Pine Resources Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/15/2, Respondent Counter Memorial, 24 July 2015 [French] Lone Pine Resources Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/15/2, Procedural Order on Disputed Document Requests, 27 May 2016 Lone Pine Resources Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/15/2, Procedural Order No. 2, 19 October 2016 Lone Pine Resources Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/15/2, Procedural Order on Withheld and Redacted Documentation, 24 February 2017 Lone Pine Resources Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/15/2, Procedural Order on the Claimant Applications dated 31 March 2017 and 27 April 2017, 4 May 2017 Lone Pine Resources Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/15/2, Procedural Order No. 3, 14 June 2017 Lone Pine Resources Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/15/2, Claimant Reply, 22 May 2017 Lone Pine Resources Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/15/2, Procedural Order No. 4, 27 July 2017 Lone Pine Resources Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/15/2, Procedural Order No. 5, 10 August 2017 Lone Pine Resources Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/15/2, Application for Leave to File an Amicus Curiae Submitted by Mr. Muhammad Muzahidul Islam, 4 August 2017 Lone Pine Resources Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/15/2, Application for Leave to File an Amicus Curiae Submitted by the Quebec Environmental Law Centre (CQDE), 16 August 2017 [French] Lone Pine Resources Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/15/2, NAFTA Article 1128 Submission of United Mexican States, 16 August 2017 Lone Pine Resources Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/15/2, NAFTA Article 1128 Submission of United States of America, 16 August 2017 Lone Pine Resources Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/15/2, Amicus Curiae Submission of the Quebec Environmental Law Centre (CQDE), 16 August 2017 [French] Lone Pine Resources Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/15/2, Procedural Order on Amici Applications for Leave to File Non-Disputing Party Submissions, 10 September 2017 Lone Pine Resources Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/15/2, Procedural Order No. 6, 13 September 2017 Lone Pine Resources Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/15/2, Procedural Order No. 7, 14 September 2017 Lone Pine Resources Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/15/2, Claimant Observations on Non-Disputing Party Applications, 30 August 2017 Lone Pine Resources Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/15/2, Respondent Observations on Non-Disputing Party Applications, 30 August 2017 [French] Lone Pine Resources Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/15/2, Respondent Rejoinder, 4 August 2017 [French] Lone Pine Resources Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/15/2, Claimant Observations on NAFTA Article 1128 Submissions, 22 September 2017 Lone Pine Resources Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/15/2, Respondent Observations on NAFTA Article 1128 Submissions, 22 September 2017 [French] Lone Pine Resources Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/15/2, Claimant Response to Amicus Curiae Submission of the Quebec Environmental Law Centre (CQDE), 22 September 2017", "field_61": "20121108 20130906 20150227 20150206 20150311 20150410 20150724 20160527 20161019 20170224 20170504 20170614 20170522 20170727 20170810 20170804 20170816 20170910 20170913 20170914 20170830 20170922", "field_62": "234 235", "Filename": "db://FE_SelectDisputeViewForContegraSearch#RowId=949" }, "paragraphs": null, "hitCount": 0, "highlightedFields": null }, { "fields": { "rowid": "915 5803 5804 5805 5806 5807 5808 5809", "disputeid": "13318", "disputecitation": "Melvin J. Howard, Centurion Health Corp. & Howard Family Trust v. Government of Canada (PCA Case No. 2009-21)", "fullcitation": "Melvin J. Howard, Centurion Health Corp. & Howard Family Trust v. Government of Canada (PCA Case No. 2009-21)", "disputestartdate": "20080711", "isdisputecitation": "1", "modifiedon": "20210223", "field_respondentstates": "Canada", "field_100": "13687,13688,13689", "field_101": "578,578,578", "field_106": "14296", "field_108": "510", "field_109": "403", "field_110": "20080711", "field_145": "332", "field_67": "Melvin J. Howard, Centurion Health Corp. & Howard Family Trust v. Government of Canada", "field_68": "PCA Case No. 2009-21", "field_69": "12324", "field_70": "11086", "field_71": "UN/0046", "field_72": "Howard v. Canada", "field_73": "Melvin J. Howard, Centurion Health Corp. & Howard Family Trust v. Government of Canada (PCA Case No. 2009-21)", "field_74": "2024", "field_77": "2021", "field_78": "112", "field_82": "8013", "field_83": "113", "contenttypedatamasterid": "19557 19558 19559 19560 19561 19562 19563", "field_documenttypeid": "1064 1076 1075 1079", "field_137": "True", "field_56": "15220", "field_57": "UN/0046/01 UN/0046/02 UN/0046/03 UN/0046/04 UN/0046/05 UN/0046/06 UN/0046/07", "field_58": "Order for the Termination of Proceedings and Award on Costs Correction Order for the Termination of Proceedings and Award on Costs Notice of Intent Notice of Arbitration Revised Statement of Claim Respondent's Motion on Termination and Costs Claimant's Reponses on Motion to Terminate", "field_59": "Howard v. Canada Order for the Termination of Proceedings and Award on Costs Howard v. Canada Correction Order for the Termination of Proceedings and Award on Costs Howard v. Canada Notice of Intent Howard v. Canada Notice of Arbitration Howard v. Canada Revised Statement of Claim Howard v. Canada Respondent's Motion on Termination and Costs Howard v. Canada Claimant's Reponses on Motion to Terminate", "field_60": "Melvin J. Howard, Centurion Health Corp. & Howard Family Trust v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-21, Order for the Termination of Proceedings and Award on Costs, 2 August 2010 Melvin J. Howard, Centurion Health Corp. & Howard Family Trust v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-21, Correction Order for the Termination of Proceedings and Award on Costs, 9 August 2010 Melvin J. Howard, Centurion Health Corp. & Howard Family Trust v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-21, Notice of Intent, 11 July 2008 Melvin J. Howard, Centurion Health Corp. & Howard Family Trust v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-21, Notice of Arbitration, 5 January 2008 Melvin J. Howard, Centurion Health Corp. & Howard Family Trust v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-21, Revised Statement of Claim, 2 February 2009 Melvin J. Howard, Centurion Health Corp. & Howard Family Trust v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-21, Respondent's Motion on Termination and Costs, 29 April 2010 Melvin J. Howard, Centurion Health Corp. & Howard Family Trust v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-21, Claimant's Response on Motion to Terminate, 18 May 2010", "field_61": "20100802 20100809 20080711 20080105 20090202 20100429 20100518", "field_62": "234", "Filename": "db://FE_SelectDisputeViewForContegraSearch#RowId=915", "field_104": "8071", "field_105": "900", "field_75": "281", "field_150": "21485 21484" }, "paragraphs": null, "hitCount": 0, "highlightedFields": null }, { "fields": { "rowid": "30 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485", "disputeid": "12429", "disputecitation": "Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3)", "fullcitation": "Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3)", "disputestartdate": "20120516", "isdisputecitation": "1", "modifiedon": "20210301", "field_respondentstates": "Canada", "field_100": "12808", "field_101": "578", "field_106": "14297", "field_108": "403", "field_109": "403", "field_110": "20120516", "field_145": "332", "field_67": "Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada", "field_68": "ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3", "field_69": "12324", "field_70": "11085", "field_71": "AF/0030", "field_72": "Mercer v. Canada", "field_73": "Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3)", "field_74": "1869", "field_77": "1824", "field_78": "112", "field_82": "8179", "field_83": "113", "contenttypedatamasterid": "14080 14081 14082 14083 14084 14085 14086 14087 14088 14089 14090 14091 14092 14093 14094 14095 14096 14097 14098 14099 14100 14101 14102 14103 14104 14105 14106 14107 14108 14109 14110 14111 14112 14113 14114 14115 14116 14117 14118 14119 14120 14121 14122 14123 14124 14125 14126 14127 14128 14129 14130 14131 14132 14133 14134 14135 14136 14137 14138 14139 14140 14141 14142 14143 14144 14145 14146 14147 14148 14149 14150 14151 14152 14153 14154 14155 14156 14157 14158", "field_documenttypeid": "1076 1075 1080 1079 1074 1077 1065", "field_137": "True", "field_56": "14331", "field_57": "AF/0030/01 AF/0030/02 AF/0030/03 AF/0030/04 AF/0030/05 AF/0030/06 AF/0030/07 AF/0030/08 AF/0030/09 AF/0030/10 AF/0030/11 AF/0030/12 AF/0030/13 AF/0030/14 AF/0030/15 AF/0030/16 AF/0030/17 AF/0030/18 AF/0030/19 AF/0030/20 AF/0030/21 AF/0030/22 AF/0030/23 AF/0030/24 AF/0030/25 AF/0030/26 AF/0030/27 AF/0030/28 AF/0030/29 AF/0030/30 AF/0030/31 AF/0030/32 AF/0030/33 AF/0030/34 AF/0030/35 AF/0030/36 AF/0030/37 AF/0030/38 AF/0030/39 AF/0030/40 AF/0030/41 AF/0030/42 AF/0030/43 AF/0030/44 AF/0030/45 AF/0030/46 AF/0030/47 AF/0030/48 AF/0030/49 AF/0030/50 AF/0030/51 AF/0030/52 AF/0030/53 AF/0030/54 AF/0030/55 AF/0030/56 AF/0030/57 AF/0030/58 AF/0030/59 AF/0030/60 AF/0030/61 AF/0030/62 AF/0030/63 AF/0030/64 AF/0030/65 AF/0030/66 AF/0030/67 AF/0030/68 AF/0030/69 AF/0030/70 AF/0030/71 AF/0030/72 AF/0030/73 AF/0030/74 AF/0030/75 AF/0030/76 AF/0030/77 AF/0030/78 AF/0030/79", "field_58": "Notice of Intent Request for Arbitration Procedural Order No. 1 Procedural Order No. 2 Procedural Order No. 3 Confidentiality Order Procedural Order No. 4 Procedural Order No. 5 Claimant Memorial Respondent Counter-Memorial [Redacted] Witness Statement of Jim Scouras Witness Statement of Fred Fominoff Witness Statement of Dennis Swanson Expert Report of Michael Rosenzweig of Nera Economic Consulting Witness Statement of Pierre Lamarche Witness Statement of Lester Dyck Witness Statement of Peter Ostergaard Expert Report of James Stockard of Pöyry Management Consulting Witness Statement of Les MacLaren Procedural Order No. 6 Procedural Order No. 7 Claimant Reply [Redacted] Witness Statement of John Allan [Redacted] Witness Statement of Robert Friesen [Redacted] Witness Statement of James McLaren, P. Eng. [Redacted] Second Witness Statement of Brian Merwin [Redacted] Witness Statement of Robert Sweeney, P. Eng. [Redacted] Expert Report of David Austin, Esq. [Redacted] Second Expert Report of Brent C. Kaczmarek, CFA [Redacted] Expert Report of Dr. Peter Fox-Penner, The Brattle Group [Redacted] Second Expert Statement of Elroy Switlishoff, P. Eng, M. Eng. [Redacted] Claimant Memorial Index of Exhibits [Redacted] Witness Statement of David Gandossi [Redacted] Witness Statement of Brian Merwin [Redacted] Expert Report of Brent C. Kaczmarek, CFA [Redacted] Expert Statement of Elroy Switlishoff, P. Eng, M. Eng. [Redacted] Respondent Rejoinder Second Witness Statement of Lester Dyck Witness Statement of Roger Garratt Witness Statement of Dean Krauss Witness Statement of Christian Lague Second Witness Statement of Pierre Lamarche Witness Statement of Michael W. MacDougall Second Witness Statement of Les MacLaren Witness Statement of Denise Mullen Witness Statement of Jon O'Riordan Second Witness Statement of Jim Scouras Second Witness Statement of Dennis Swanson Expert Report of David Bursey Second Expert Report of James Stockard of Pöyry Management Consulting Rebuttal Expert Report of Michael Rosenzweig of Nera Economic Consulting Appendix 2 of Rebuttal Expert Report of Michael Rosenzweig of Nera Economic Consulting Appendix 3.A of Rebuttal Expert Report of Michael Rosenzweig of Nera Economic Consulting Procedural Order No. 8 Procedural Order No. 9 United States 1128 Submission Mexico 1128 Submission Claimant Response to 1128 Submissions Respondent Response to 1128 Submissions Procedural Order No. 10 Procedural Order No. 11 Award Hearing Transcripts - Day 1 Hearing Transcripts - Day 2 Hearing Transcripts - Day 3 Hearing Transcripts - Day 4 Hearing Transcripts - Day 5 Hearing Transcripts - Day 6 Hearing Transcripts - Day 7 Hearing Transcripts - Day 8 Claimant Post-Hearing Submission Respondent Post-Hearing Submission Claimant Request for Supplementary Decision Respondent Reply to Claimant Request for Supplementary Decision Respondent Response to Claimant Observations of June 25, 2018 Supplementary Decision Claimant Observations to Respondent Reply of June 4, 2018 Respondent Counter-Memorial Appendix 2 [Redacted] Respondent Counter-Memorial Appendix 3 [Redacted]", "field_59": "Mercer v. Canada Notice of Intent Mercer v. Canada Request for Arbitration Mercer v. Canada Procedural Order No. 1 Mercer v. Canada Procedural Order No. 2 Mercer v. Canada Procedural Order No. 3 Mercer v. Canada Confidentiality Order Mercer v. Canada Procedural Order No. 4 Mercer v. Canada Procedural Order No. 5 Mercer v. Canada Claimant Memorial Mercer v. Canada Respondent Counter-Memorial [Redacted] Mercer v. Canada Witness Statement of Jim Scouras Mercer v. Canada Witness Statement of Fred Fominoff Mercer v. Canada Witness Statement of Dennis Swanson Mercer v. Canada Expert Report of Michael Rosenzweig of Nera Economic Consulting Mercer v. Canada Witness Statement of Pierre Lamarche Mercer v. Canada Witness Statement of Lester Dyck Mercer v. Canada Witness Statement of Peter Ostergaard Mercer v. Canada Expert Report of James Stockard of Pöyry Management Consulting Mercer v. Canada Witness Statement of Les MacLaren Mercer v. Canada Procedural Order No. 6 Mercer v. Canada Procedural Order No. 7 Mercer v. Canada Claimant Reply [Redacted] Mercer v. Canada Witness Statement of John Allan [Redacted] Mercer v. Canada Witness Statement of Robert Friesen [Redacted] Mercer v. Canada Witness Statement of James McLaren, P. Eng. [Redacted] Mercer v. Canada Second Witness Statement of Brian Merwin [Redacted] Mercer v. Canada Witness Statement of Robert Sweeney, P. Eng. [Redacted] Mercer v. Canada Expert Report of David Austin, Esq. [Redacted] Mercer v. Canada Second Expert Report of Brent C. Kaczmarek, CFA [Redacted] Mercer v. Canada Expert Report of Dr. Peter Fox-Penner, The Brattle Group [Redacted] Mercer v. Canada Second Expert Statement of Elroy Switlishoff, P. Eng, M. Eng. [Redacted] Mercer v. Canada Claimant Memorial Index of Exhibits [Redacted] Mercer v. Canada Witness Statement of David Gandossi [Redacted] Mercer v. Canada Witness Statement of Brian Merwin [Redacted] Mercer v. Canada Expert Report of Brent C. Kaczmarek, CFA [Redacted] Mercer v. Canada Expert Statement of Elroy Switlishoff, P. Eng, M. Eng. [Redacted] Mercer v. Canada Respondent Rejoinder Mercer v. Canada Second Witness Statement of Lester Dyck Mercer v. Canada Witness Statement of Roger Garratt Mercer v. Canada Witness Statement of Dean Krauss Mercer v. Canada Witness Statement of Christian Lague Mercer v. Canada Second Witness Statement of Pierre Lamarche Mercer v. Canada Witness Statement of Michael W. MacDougall Mercer v. Canada Second Witness Statement of Les MacLaren Mercer v. Canada Witness Statement of Denise Mullen Mercer v. Canada Witness Statement of Jon O'Riordan Mercer v. Canada Second Witness Statement of Jim Scouras Mercer v. Canada Second Witness Statement of Dennis Swanson Mercer v. Canada Expert Report of David Bursey Mercer v. Canada Second Expert Report of James Stockard of Pöyry Management Consulting Mercer v. Canada Rebuttal Expert Report of Michael Rosenzweig of Nera Economic Consulting Mercer v. Canada Appendix 2 of Rebuttal Expert Report of Michael Rosenzweig of Nera Economic Consulting Mercer v. Canada Appendix 3.A of Rebuttal Expert Report of Michael Rosenzweig of Nera Economic Consulting Mercer v. Canada Procedural Order No. 8 Mercer v. Canada Procedural Order No. 9 Mercer v. Canada United States 1128 Submission Mercer v. Canada Mexico 1128 Submission Mercer v. Canada Claimant Response to 1128 Submissions Mercer v. Canada Respondent Response to 1128 Submissions Mercer v. Canada Procedural Order No. 10 Mercer v. Canada Procedural Order No. 11 Mercer v. Canada Award Mercer v. Canada Hearing Transcripts - Day 1 Mercer v. Canada Hearing Transcripts - Day 2 Mercer v. Canada Hearing Transcripts - Day 3 Mercer v. Canada Hearing Transcripts - Day 4 Mercer v. Canada Hearing Transcripts - Day 5 Mercer v. Canada Hearing Transcripts - Day 6 Mercer v. Canada Hearing Transcripts - Day 7 Mercer v. Canada Hearing Transcripts - Day 8 Mercer v. Canada Claimant Post-Hearing Submission Mercer v. Canada Respondent Post-Hearing Submission Mercer v. Canada Claimant Request for Supplementary Decision Mercer v. Canada Respondent Reply to Claimant Request for Supplementary Decision Mercer v. Canada Respondent Response to Claimant Observations of June 25, 2018 Mercer v. Canada Supplementary Decision Mercer v. Canada Claimant Observations to Respondent Reply of June 4, 2018 Mercer v. Canada Respondent Counter-Memorial Appendix 2 [Redacted] Mercer v. Canada Respondent Counter-Memorial Appendix 3 [Redacted]", "field_60": "Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Notice of Intent, 26 January 2012 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Request for Arbitration, 30 April 2012 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Procedural Order No. 1, 24 January 2013 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Procedural Order No. 2, 29 April 2013 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Procedural Order No. 3, 7 June 2013 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Confidentiality Order, 24 January 2013 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Procedural Order No. 4, 19 December 2013 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Procedural Order No. 5, 11 March 2014 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Claimant Memorial, 31 March 2014 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Respondent Counter-Memorial, 22 August 2014 [Redacted] Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Witness Statement of Jim Scouras, 21 August 2014, Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/13, Witness Statement of Fred Fominoff, 19 August 2014 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Witness Statement of Dennis Swanson, 22 August 2014 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Expert Report of Michael Rosenzweig of Nera Economic Consulting, 22 August 2014 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Witness Statement of Pierre Lamarche, 20 August 2014 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Witness Statement of Lester Dyck, 21 August 2014 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Witness Statement of Peter Ostergaard, 21 August 2014 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Expert Report of James Stockard of Pöyry Management Consulting, 22 August 2014 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Witness Statement of Les MacLaren, 26 August 2014 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Procedural Order No. 6, 18 September 2014 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Procedural Order No. 7, 1 December 2014 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Claimant Reply, 16 December 2014 [Redacted] Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Witness Statement of John Allan, 16 December 2014 [Redacted] Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Witness Statement of Robert Friesen, 16 December 2014 [Redacted] Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Witness Statement of James McLaren, P. Eng., 16 December 2014 [Redacted] Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Second Witness Statement of Brian Merwin, 16 December 2014 [Redacted] Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Witness Statement of Robert Sweeney, P. Eng., 16 December 2014 [Redacted] Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Expert Report of David Austin, Esq., 16 December 2014 [Redacted] Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Second Expert Report of Brent C. Kaczmarek, CFA, 16 December 2014 [Redacted] Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Expert Report of Dr. Peter Fox-Penner, The Brattle Group, 16 December 2014 [Redacted] Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Second Expert Statement of Elroy Switlishoff, P. Eng, M. Eng., 16 December 2014 [Redacted] Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Claimant Memorial Index of Exhibits, 31 March 2014 [Redacted] Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Witness Statement of David Gandossi, 31 March 2014 [Redacted] Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Witness Statement of Brian Merwin, 31 March 2014 [Redacted] Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Expert Report of Brent C. Kaczmarek, CFA, 31 March 2014 [Redacted] Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Expert Statement of Elroy Switlishoff, P. Eng, M. Eng., 27 March 2014 [Redacted] Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Respondent Rejoinder, 31 March 2015 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Second Witness Statement of Lester Dyck, 9 April 2015 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Witness Statement of Roger Garratt, 19 March 2015 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Witness Statement of Dean Krauss, 31 March 2015 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Witness Statement of Christian Lague, 27 March 2015 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Second Witness Statement of Pierre Lamarche, 23 March 2015 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Wistness Statement of Michael W. MacDougall, 21 March 2015 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Second Witness Statement of Les MacLaren, 24 March 2015 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Witness Statement of Denise Mullen, 25 March 2015 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Witness Statement of Jon O'Riordan, 25 March 2015 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Second Witness Statement of Jim Scouras, 30 March 2015 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Second Witness Statement of Dennis Swanson, 27 March 2015 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Expert Report of David Bursey, 31 March 2015 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Second Expert Report of James Stockard of Pöyry Management Consulting, 29 April 2015 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Rebuttal Expert Report of Michael Rosenzweig of Nera Economic Consulting, 31 March 2015 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Appendix 2 of Rebuttal Expert Report of Michael Rosenzweig of Nera Economic Consulting, 31 March 2015 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Appendix 3.A of Rebuttal Expert Report of Michael Rosenzweig of Nera Economic Consulting, 31 March 2015 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Procedural Order No. 8, 18 June 2015 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Procedural Order No. 9, 13 July 2015 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, United States 1128 Submission, 8 May 2015 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Mexico 1128 Submission, 8 May 2015 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Claimant Response to 1128 Submissions, 12 June 2015 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Respondent Response to 1128 Submissions, 12 June 2015 Mercer International Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/12/3, Procedural Order No. 10, 18 November 2015 Mercer I", "field_61": "20120126 20120430 20130124 20130429 20130607 20131219 20140311 20140331 20140822 20140821 20140819 20140820 20140826 20140918 20141201 20141216 20140327 20150331 20150409 20150319 20150327 20150323 20150321 20150324 20150325 20150330 20150429 20150618 20150713 20150508 20150612 20150412 20151118 20160408 20180306 20150721 20150722 20150723 20150724 20150727 20150728 20150729 20150731 20160107 20160226 20180420 20180604 20180716 20181210 20180625", "field_62": "234", "Filename": "db://FE_SelectDisputeViewForContegraSearch#RowId=30", "field_102": "3188,3284,3436,3886,4505,5275,6140,6159,6214,6216,6219,6221,6223,6232,6233,7962", "field_103": "660,660,660,660,660,660,660,660,660,660,660,1599,1599,660,1731,660", "field_104": "2388,2497,3085,3368,4355,5462,6183,6225,6227,6230,6235,6237,6238,6239,6240,8072", "field_105": "1313,900,900,900,900,900,900,900,1313,725,900,900,846,886,1755,900", "field_111": "93", "field_112": "107", "field_75": "281", "field_107": "25993", "field_150": "16082 16068" }, "paragraphs": null, "hitCount": 0, "highlightedFields": null }, { "fields": { "rowid": "901 5459 5460 5461 5462 5463 5464 5465 5466 5467 5468 5469 5470 5471 5472 5473 5474 5475 5476 5477 5478 5479 5480 5481 5482 5483 5484 5485 5486 5487 5488 5489 5490 5491 5492 5493 5494 5495 7990 7991 7992 7993 7994 7995 7996 7997 7998 7999 8000", "disputeid": "13304", "disputecitation": "Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada (ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1)", "fullcitation": "Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada (ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1)", "disputestartdate": "20061227", "isdisputecitation": "1", "modifiedon": "20210216", "field_respondentstates": "Canada", "field_100": "13673", "field_101": "578", "field_106": "14289", "field_108": "578", "field_109": "403", "field_110": "20061227", "field_145": "332", "field_67": "Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada", "field_68": "ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1", "field_69": "12324", "field_70": "11086", "field_71": "UN/0032", "field_72": "Merrill & Ring v. Canada", "field_73": "Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada (ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1)", "field_74": "1824", "field_77": "2005", "field_78": "112", "field_82": "1865", "field_83": "113", "contenttypedatamasterid": "19196 19197 19198 19199 19200 19201 19202 19203 19204 19205 19206 19207 19208 19209 19210 19218 19221 19222 19223 19224 19225 19228 19229 19230 19231 19232 19233 19234 19235 19236 19237 19238 19239 19240 19241 19242 19243 23275 23276 23277 23278 23279 23280 23281 23282 23283 23284 23285", "field_documenttypeid": "1080 1072 1077 1074 1076 1075 1079", "field_137": "True", "field_56": "15206", "field_57": "UN/0032/01 UN/0032/02 UN/0032/03 UN/0032/04 UN/0032/05 UN/0032/06 UN/0032/07 UN/0032/08 UN/0032/09 UN/0032/10 UN/0032/11 UN/0032/12 UN/0032/13 UN/0032/14 UN/0032/15 UN/0032/18 UN/0032/20 UN/0032/21 UN/0032/22 UN/0032/23 UN/0032/24 UN/0032/26 UN/0032/27 UN/0032/28 UN/0032/29 UN/0032/30 UN/0032/31 UN/0032/32 UN/0032/33 UN/0032/34 UN/0032/35 UN/0032/36 UN/0032/37 UN/0032/38 UN/0032/39 UN/0032/40 UN/0032/41 UN/0032/42 UN/0032/43 UN/0032/44 UN/0032/45 UN/0032/46 UN/0032/47 UN/0032/48 UN/0032/49 UN/0032/50 UN/0032/51 UN/0032/52", "field_58": "Order Concerning Requests for Documents and Evidentiary Matters Letter from the Tribunal Decision on Place of Arbitration Document Production Order from Tribunal Decision on Document Production Decision on Motion to Add a New Party Confidentiality Order Decision on new damages claim Award Notice of Intent Notice of Arbitration and Statement of Claim Respondent Statement of Defense Claimant Observations on Preliminary Objections Claimant Reply Memorial Letter from the ICSID Claimant Submission on Place of Arbitration Claimant Submission on Confidentiality Claimant Submission on Document Production and Information Requests Respondent Submission on Place of Arbitration, Confidentiality, Bifurcation of Preliminary Objections and Schedule Claimant Motion to Add a New Party (Public Version) Respondent Reply to Add a New Party Decision on Cabinet Privilege United States 1128 Submission Respondent Response to Petition of Non-Disputing Parties Claimant Response to Petition of Non-Disputing Parties Petition of Non-Disputing Parties to File Written Submission Non-Disputing Parties Submission Mexico 1128 Submission Transcription of Hearing - Day One Transcription of Hearing - Day Two Transcription of Hearing - Day Three Transcription of Hearing - Day Four Transcription of Hearing - Day Five Transcription of Hearing - Day Six Respondent Submission on Confidentiality Order Claimant Memorial (Public Version) [Part A] Claimant Memorial (Public Version) [Part B] Claimant Memorial (Public Version) [Part C] Respondent Counter-Memorial [Part A] Respondent Counter-Memorial [Part B] Respondent Counter-Memorial [Part C] Respondent Counter-Memorial [Part D] Respondent Rejoinder Memorial (Public Version) [Part A] Respondent Rejoinder Memorial (Public Version) [Part B] Transcript of Procedural Meeting [Part A] Transcript of Procedural Meeting [Part B]", "field_59": "Merrill & Ring v. Canada Order Concerning Requests for Documents and Evidentiary Matters Merrill & Ring v. Canada Letter from the Tribunal Merrill & Ring v. Canada Decision on Place of Arbitration Merrill & Ring v. Canada Document Production Order from Tribunal Merrill & Ring v. Canada Decision on Document Production Merrill & Ring v. Canada Decision on Motion to Add a New Party Merrill & Ring v. Canada Confidentiality Order Merrill & Ring v. Canada Decision on new damages claim Merrill & Ring v. Canada Award Merrill & Ring v. Canada Notice of Intent Merrill & Ring v. Canada Notice of Arbitration and Statement of Claim Merrill & Ring v. Canada Respondent Statement of Defense Merrill & Ring v. Canada Claimant Observations on Preliminary Objections Merrill & Ring v. Canada Claimant Reply Memorial Merrill & Ring v. Canada Letter from the ICSID Merrill & Ring v. Canada Claimant Submission on Place of Arbitration Merrill & Ring v. Canada Claimant Submission on Confidentiality Merrill & Ring v. Canada Claimant Submission on Document Production and Information Requests Merrill & Ring v. Canada Respondent Submission on Place of Arbitration, Confidentiality, Bifurcation of Preliminary Objections and Schedule Merrill & Ring v. Canada Claimant Motion to Add a New Party (Public Version) Merrill & Ring v. Canada Respondent Reply to Add a New Party Merrill & Ring v. Canada Decision on Cabinet Privilege Merrill & Ring v. Canada United States 1128 Submission Merrill & Ring v. Canada Respondent Response to Petition of Non-Disputing Parties Merrill & Ring v. Canada Claimant Response to Petition of Non-Disputing Parties Merrill & Ring v. Canada Petition of Non-Disputing Parties to File Written Submission Merrill & Ring v. Canada Non-Disputing Parties Submission Merrill & Ring v. Canada Mexico 1128 Submission Merrill & Ring v. Canada Transcription of Hearing - Day One Merrill & Ring v. Canada Transcription of Hearing - Day Two Merrill & Ring v. Canada Transcription of Hearing - Day Three Merrill & Ring v. Canada Transcription of Hearing - Day Four Merrill & Ring v. Canada Transcription of Hearing - Day Five Merrill & Ring v. Canada Transcription of Hearing - Day Six Merrill & Ring v. Canada Respondent Submission on Confidentiality Order Merrill & Ring v. Canada Claimant Memorial (Public Version) [Part A] Merrill & Ring v. Canada Claimant Memorial (Public Version) [Part B] Merrill & Ring v. Canada Claimant Memorial (Public Version) [Part C] Merrill & Ring v. Canada Respondent Counter-Memorial [Part A] Merrill & Ring v. Canada Respondent Counter-Memorial [Part B] Merrill & Ring v. Canada Respondent Counter-Memorial [Part C] Merrill & Ring v. Canada Respondent Counter-Memorial [Part D] Merrill & Ring v. Canada Respondent Rejoinder Memorial (Public Version) [Part A] Merrill & Ring v. Canada Respondent Rejoinder Memorial (Public Version) [Part B] Merrill & Ring v. Canada Transcript of Procedural Meeting [Part A] Merrill & Ring v. Canada Transcript of Procedural Meeting [Part B]", "field_60": "Merrill & Ring Forestry L. P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Order Concerning Requests for Documents and Certain Evidentiary Matters, 24 June 2008 Merrill & Ring Forestry L. P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Letter from the Tribunal, 4 August 2008 Merrill & Ring Forestry L. P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Decision on the Place of Arbitration, 12 December 2007 Merrill & Ring Forestry L. P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Document Production Order from Tribunal, 21 January 2008 Merrill & Ring Forestry L. P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Adminstered, Decision of the Tribunal on Production of Documents, 18 July 2008 Merrill & Ring Forestry L. P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administered, Decision on a Motion to Add a New Party, 31 January 2008 Merrill & Ring Forestry L. P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Confidentiality Order, 21 January 2008 Merrill & Ring Forestry L. P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Confidentiality Order, 18 February 2008 Merrill & Ring Forestry L. P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Decision on New Damages Claim, 29 December 2008 Merrill & Ring Forestry L. P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administered, Letter from the Tribunal, 31 July 2008 Merrill & Ring Forestry L. P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Award, 31 March 2010 Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Notice of Intent, 25 September 2006 Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Notice of Arbitration and Statement of Claim, 27 December 2006 Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Respondent Statement of Defense, 30 October 2007 Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Claimant Observations on Preliminary Objections, 9 November 2007 Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Claimant Reply Memorial, 15 December 2008 Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Letter from the ICSID, 31 August 2007 Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Claimant Submission on Place of Arbitration, 9 November 2007 Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Claimant Submission on Confidentiality, 9 November 2007 Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Claimant Submission on Document Production and Information Requests, 9 November 2007 Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Respondent Submission on Place of Arbitration, Confidentiality, Bifurcation of Preliminary Objections and Schedule, 9 November 2007 Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Claimant Motion to Add a New Party (Public Version), 12 December 2007 Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Respondent Reply to Add a New Party, 2 January 2008 Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Decision on Cabinet Privilege, 3 September 2008 Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, United States 1128 Submission, 14 July 2008 Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Respondent Response to Petition of Non-Disputing Parties, 16 July 2008 Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Response to Petition of Non-Disputing Parties, 16 July 2008 Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Petition of Non-Disputing Parties to File Written Submission, 26 September 2008 Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Non-Disputing Parties Submission, 26 September 2008 Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Mexico 1128 Submission, 2 April 2009 Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Transcription of Hearing - Day One, 18 May 2009 Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Transcription of Hearing - Day Two, 19 May 2009 Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Transcription of Hearing - Day Three, 20 May 2009 Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Transcription of Hearing - Day Four, 21 May 2009 Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Transcription of Hearing - Day Five, 22 May 2009 Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Transcription of Hearing - Day Six, 23 May 2009 Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, Respondent Submission on Confidentiality Order, 29 January 2008 Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Claimant Memorial (Public Version), 13 February 2008 [Part A] Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Claimant Memorial (Public Version), 13 February 2008 [Part B] Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Claimant Memorial (Public Version), 13 February 2008 [Part C] Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Respondent Counter-Memorial, 13 May 2008 [Part A] Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Respondent Counter-Memorial, 13 May 2008 [Part B] Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Respondent Counter-Memorial, 13 May 2008 [Part C] Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Respondent Counter-Memorial, 13 May 2008 [Part D] Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Respondent Rejoinder Memorial (Public Version), 27 March 2009 [Part A] Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Respondent Rejoinder Memorial (Public Version), 27 March 2009 [Part B] Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Transcript of Procedural Meeting, 15 November 2007 [Part A] Merrill & Ring Forestry L.P. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/07/1, ICSID Administrated, Transcript of Procedural Meeting, 15 November 2007 [Part B]", "field_61": "20080624 20080804 20071212 20080121 20080718 20080131 20080218 20081229 20080731 20100331 20060925 20061227 20071030 20071109 20081215 20070831 20080102 20080903 20080714 20080716 20080926 20090402 20090518 20090519 20090520 20090521 20090522 20090523 20080129 20080213 20080513 20090327 20071115", "field_62": "234", "Filename": "db://FE_SelectDisputeViewForContegraSearch#RowId=901", "field_102": "2413", "field_103": "652,", "field_104": "8071,2497,8069,4473,26184", "field_105": "900,900,900,900,900" }, "paragraphs": null, "hitCount": 0, "highlightedFields": null }, { "fields": { "rowid": "933 5929 5930 5931 5932 5933 5934 5935 5936 5937 5938 5939 5940 5941 5942 5943 5944 5945 5946 5947 5948 5949 5950 5951 5952 5953 5954 5955 5956 5957 5958 5959 5960 5961 5962 5963 5964 5965 5966 5967 5968 5969 5970 5971 5972 5973 5974 5975 5976 5977 5978 5979 5980 5981 5982 5983 5984 5985 5986 5987 5988 5989 5990 5991 5992 5993 5994 5995 5996 5997 5998 5999 6000 6001 6002 6003 6004 6005 6006", "disputeid": "13336", "disputecitation": "Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada (PCA Case No. 2012-17)", "fullcitation": "Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada (PCA Case No. 2012-17)", "isdisputecitation": "1", "field_respondentstates": "Canada", "field_100": "13708", "field_101": "578", "field_106": "14281", "field_108": "578", "field_109": "403", "field_67": "Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada", "field_68": "PCA Case No. 2012-17", "field_69": "12324", "field_70": "11086", "field_71": "UN/0064", "field_72": "Mesa Power v. Canada", "field_73": "Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada (PCA Case No. 2012-17)", "field_74": "1836", "field_77": "2327", "field_78": "112", "field_82": "7891", "field_83": "113", "contenttypedatamasterid": "19684 19685 19686 19687 19688 19689 19690 19691 19692 19693 19694 19695 19696 19697 19698 19699 19700 19701 19702 19703 19704 19705 19706 19707 19708 19709 19710 19711 19712 19713 19714 19715 19716 19717 19718 19719 19720 19721 19722 19723 19724 19725 19726 19727 19728 19729 19730 19731 19732 19733 19734 19735 19736 19737 19738 19739 19740 19741 19742 19743 19744 19745 19746 19747 19748 19749 19750 19751 19752 19753 19754 19755 19756 19757 19758 19759 19760 19761", "field_documenttypeid": "1076 1067 1077 1080 1075 1079 1074 1081 1065", "field_137": "True", "field_56": "15238", "field_57": "UN/0064/01 UN/0064/02 UN/0064/03 UN/0064/04 UN/0064/05 UN/0064/06 UN/0064/07 UN/0064/08 UN/0064/09 UN/0064/10 UN/0064/11 UN/0064/12 UN/0064/13 UN/0064/14 UN/0064/15 UN/0064/16 UN/0064/17 UN/0064/18 UN/0064/19 UN/0064/20 UN/0064/21 UN/0064/22 UN/0064/23 UN/0064/24 UN/0064/25 UN/0064/26 UN/0064/27 UN/0064/28 UN/0064/29 UN/0064/30 UN/0064/31 UN/0064/32 UN/0064/33 UN/0064/34 UN/0064/35 UN/0064/36 UN/0064/37 UN/0064/38 UN/0064/39 UN/0064/40 UN/0064/41 UN/0064/42 UN/0064/43 UN/0064/44 UN/0064/45 UN/0064/46 UN/0064/47 UN/0064/48 UN/0064/49 UN/0064/50 UN/0064/51 UN/0064/52 UN/0064/53 UN/0064/54 UN/0064/55 UN/0064/56 UN/0064/57 UN/0064/58 UN/0064/59 UN/0064/60 UN/0064/61 UN/0064/62 UN/0064/63 UN/0064/64 UN/0064/65 UN/0064/66 UN/0064/67 UN/0064/68 UN/0064/69 UN/0064/70 UN/0064/71 UN/0064/72 UN/0064/73 UN/0064/74 UN/0064/75 UN/0064/76 UN/0064/77 UN/0064/78", "field_58": "Notice of Intent Opinion and Order of US District Court for the District of New Jersey on Mesa Application for the Issuance of a Subpoena Respondent Outline of Potential Issues Procedural Order No. 1 Annex to Procedural Order No. 1 Confidentiality Order Notice of Arbitration Respondent Objection to Jurisdiction Claimant Response on Bifurcation Procedural Order No. 2 Procedural Order No. 3 Respondent Request for Bifurcation Procedural Order No. 4 Procedural Order No. 5 Claimant Response on Objection to Jurisdiction Procedural Order No. 6 Procedural Order No. 7 Procedural Order No. 8 Claimant Memorial (public version) Witness Statement of Cole Robertson (public version) Expert Witness Report of Richard Taylor and Robert Low (public version) Respondent Counter-Memorial and Reply on Jurisdiction Expert Report of Steve Dorey Expert Report of Berkeley Research Group Procedural Order No. 9 Notification to Non-Disputing Parties and Potential Amicus Curiae I Procedural Order No. 10 Claimant Reply Memorial and Rejoinder on Jurisdiction (public version) Reply Witness Statement of Cole Robertson (public version) Expert Report of Seabron C. Adamson (public version) Reply Valuation Report of Richard Taylor and Robert Low (public version) United States 1128 Submission Mexico 1128 Submission Procedural Order No. 11 Respondent Rejoinder on the Merits with Exhibits Second Expert Report of Christopher John Goncalves with Exhibits Procedural Order No. 12 Procedural Order No. 13 Procedural Order No. 14 Witness Statement of Richard Duffy (public version) Witness Statement of Rick Jennings (public version) Witness Statement of Shawn Cronkwright (public version) Witness Statement of Susan Lo (public version) Witness Statement of Bob Chow (public version) Witness Statement of Jim MacDougall (public version) Expert Report of Gary Timm [Redacted] Rejoinder Witness Statement of Sue Lo (public version) Procedural Order No. 15 Procedural Order No. 16 Respondent Post-Hearing Submission Claimant Post-Hearing Submission Transcript of Hearing on the Merits - Day One Transcript of Hearing on the Merits - Day Two Transcript of Hearing on the Merits - Day Three Transcript of Hearing on the Merits - Day Four Transcript of Hearing on the Merits - Day Five Transcript of Hearing on the Merits - Day Six Respondent Submission on Costs Claimant Statement of Costs Respondent Reply Submission on Costs Claimant Reply Statement of Costs Tribunal Letter Inviting Submissions on the Bilcon Award Claimant Observations on the Bilcon Award United States of America Submission on the Bilcon Award Mexico Submission on the Bilcon Award Canada Observations on the Bilcon Award Respondent Reply to 1128 Submissions Claimant Reply to 1128 Submissions Award Concurring and Dissenting Opinion of Judge Charles N. Brower Claimant Petition and Motion to U.S. District Court of Columbia to Vacate Award Correction to the Award of 24 March 2016 Memorandum Opinion of the US District Court for the District of Columbia Statement of Particulars of the Statement of Claim Notification to Non-Disputing Parties and Potential Amicus Curiae II Mexico Letter to the Tribunal United States Letter to the Tribunal Claimant Letter to the Tribunal re Article 1128 Submissions", "field_59": "Mesa Power v. Canada Notice of Intent Mesa Power v. Canada Opinion and Order of US District Court for the District of New Jersey on Mesa Application for the Issuance of a Subpoena Mesa Power v. Canada Respondent Outline of Potential Issues Mesa Power v. Canada Procedural Order No. 1 Mesa Power v. Canada Annex to Procedural Order No. 1 Mesa Power v. Canada Confidentiality Order Mesa Power v. Canada Notice of Arbitration Mesa Power v. Canada Respondent Objection to Jurisdiction Mesa Power v. Canada Claimant Response on Bifurcation Mesa Power v. Canada Procedural Order No. 2 Mesa Power v. Canada Procedural Order No. 3 Mesa Power v. Canada Respondent Request for Bifurcation Mesa Power v. Canada Procedural Order No. 4 Mesa Power v. Canada Procedural Order No. 5 Mesa Power v. Canada Claimant Response on Objection to Jurisdiction Mesa Power v. Canada Procedural Order No. 6 Mesa Power v. Canada Procedural Order No. 7 Mesa Power v. Canada Procedural Order No. 8 Mesa Power v. Canada Claimant Memorial (public version) Mesa Power v. Canada Witness Statement of Cole Robertson (public version) Mesa Power v. Canada Expert Witness Report of Richard Taylor and Robert Low (public version) Mesa Power v. Canada Respondent Counter-Memorial and Reply on Jurisdiction Mesa Power v. Canada Expert Report of Steve Dorey Mesa Power v. Canada Expert Report of Berkeley Research Group Mesa Power v. Canada Procedural Order No. 9 Mesa Power v. Canada Notification to Non-Disputing Parties and Potential Amicus Curiae I Mesa Power v. Canada Procedural Order No. 10 Mesa Power v. Canada Claimant Reply Memorial and Rejoinder on Jurisdiction (public version) Mesa Power v. Canada Reply Witness Statement of Cole Robertson (public version) Mesa Power v. Canada Expert Report of Seabron C. Adamson (public version) Mesa Power v. Canada Reply Valuation Report of Richard Taylor and Robert Low (public version) Mesa Power v. Canada United States 1128 Submission Mesa Power v. Canada Mexico 1128 Submission Mesa Power v. Canada Procedural Order No. 11 Mesa Power v. Canada Respondent Rejoinder on the Merits with Exhibits Mesa Power v. Canada Second Expert Report of Christopher John Goncalves with Exhibits Mesa Power v. Canada Procedural Order No. 12 Mesa Power v. Canada Procedural Order No. 13 Mesa Power v. Canada Procedural Order No. 14 Mesa Power v. Canada Witness Statement of Richard Duffy (public version) Mesa Power v. Canada Witness Statement of Rick Jennings (public version) Mesa Power v. Canada Witness Statement of Shawn Cronkwright (public version) Mesa Power v. Canada Witness Statement of Susan Lo (public version) Mesa Power v. Canada Witness Statement of Bob Chow (public version) Mesa Power v. Canada Witness Statement of Jim MacDougall (public version) Mesa Power v. Canada Expert Report of Gary Timm [Redacted] Mesa Power v. Canada Rejoinder Witness Statement of Sue Lo (public version) Mesa Power v. Canada Procedural Order No. 15 Mesa Power v. Canada Procedural Order No. 16 Mesa Power v. Canada Respondent Post-Hearing Submission Mesa Power v. Canada Claimant Post-Hearing Submission Mesa Power v. Canada Transcript of Hearing on the Merits - Day One Mesa Power v. Canada Transcript of Hearing on the Merits - Day Two Mesa Power v. Canada Transcript of Hearing on the Merits - Day Three Mesa Power v. Canada Transcript of Hearing on the Merits - Day Four Mesa Power v. Canada Transcript of Hearing on the Merits - Day Five Mesa Power v. Canada Transcript of Hearing on the Merits - Day Six Mesa Power v. Canada Respondent Submission on Costs Mesa Power v. Canada Claimant Statement of Costs Mesa Power v. Canada Respondent Reply Submission on Costs Mesa Power v. Canada Claimant Reply Statement of Costs Mesa Power v. Canada Tribunal Letter Inviting Submissions on the Bilcon Award Mesa Power v. Canada Claimant Observations on the Bilcon Award Mesa Power v. Canada United States of America Submission on the Bilcon Award Mesa Power v. Canada Mexico Submission on the Bilcon Award Mesa Power v. Canada Canada Observations on the Bilcon Award Mesa Power v. Canada Respondent Reply to 1128 Submissions Mesa Power v. Canada Claimant Reply to 1128 Submissions Mesa Power v. Canada Award Mesa Power v. Canada Concurring and Dissenting Opinion of Judge Charles N. Brower Mesa Power v. Canada Claimant Petition and Motion to U.S. District Court of Columbia to Vacate Award Mesa Power v. Canada Correction to the Award of 24 March 2016 Mesa Power v. Canada Memorandum Opinion of the US District Court for the District of Columbia Mesa Power v. Canada Statement of Particulars of the Statement of Claim Mesa Power v. Canada Notification to Non-Disputing Parties and Potential Amicus Curiae II Mesa Power v. Canada Mexico Letter to the Tribunal Mesa Power v. Canada United States Letter to the Tribunal Mesa Power v. Canada Claimant Letter to the Tribunal re Article 1128 Submissions", "field_60": "Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Notice of Intent, 6 July 2011 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Opinion and Order of US District Court for the District of New Jersey on Mesa Application for the Issuance of a Subpoena, 20 November 2012 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Respondent Outline of Potential Issues, 31 July 2012 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Procedural Order No. 1, 21 November 2012 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Annex to Procedural Order No. 1, 21 November 2012 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Confidentiality Order, 21 November 2012 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Notice of Arbitration, 4 October 2011 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Respondent Objection to Jurisdiction, 3 December 2012 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Claimant Response on Bifurcation, 24 December 2012 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Procedural Order No. 2, 18 January 2013 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Procedural Order No. 3, 28 March 2013 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Respondent Request for Bifurcation, 3 December 2012 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Procedural Order No. 4, 12 July 2013 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Procedural Order No. 5, 23 August 2013 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Claimant Response on Objection to Jurisdiction, 19 February 2013 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Procedural Order No. 6, 5 March 2014 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Procedural Order No. 7, 10 April 2014 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Procedural Order No. 8, 9 May 2014 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Claimant Memorial (public version), 20 November 2013 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Witness Statement of Cole Robertson (public version), 19 November 2013 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Expert Witness Report of Richard Taylor and Robert Low (public version), 18 November 2013 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Respondent Counter-Memorial and Reply on Jurisdiction, 28 February 2014 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Expert Report of Steve Dorey, 28 February 2014 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Expert Report of Berkeley Research Group, 28 February 2014 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Procedural Order No. 9, 28 May 2014 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Notification to Non-Disputing Parties and Potential Amicus Curiae I, 16 June 2014 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Procedural Order No. 10, 24 June 2014 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Claimant Reply Memorial and Rejoinder on Jurisdiction (public version), 30 April 2014 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Reply Witness Statement of Cole Robertson (public version), 28 April 2014 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Expert Report of Seabron C. Adamson (public version), 27 April 2014 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Reply Valuation Report of Richard Taylor and Robert Low (public version), 29 April 2014 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, United States 1128 Submission, 25 July 2014 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Mexico 1128 Submission, 25 July 2014 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Procedural Order No. 11, 4 July 2014 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Respondent Rejoinder on the Merits with Exhibits, 2 July 2014 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Second Expert Report of Christopher John Goncalves with Exhibits, 27 June 2014 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Procedural Order No. 12, 18 August 2014 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Procedural Order No. 13, 4 September 2014 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Procedural Order No. 14, 3 October 2014 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Witness Statement of Richard Duffy (public version), 28 February 2014 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Witness Statement of Rick Jennings (public version), 28 February 2014 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Witness Statement of Shawn Cronkwright (public version), 28 February 2014 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Witness Statement of Susan Lo (public version), 28 February 2014 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Witness Statement of Bob Chow (public version), 28 February 2014 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Witness Statement of Jim MacDougall (public version), 28 February 2014 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Expert Report of Gary Timm, 28 April 2014 [Redacted] Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Rejoinder Witness Statement of Sue Lo (public version), 2 July 2014 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Procedural Order No. 15, 20 October 2014 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Procedural Order No. 16, 10 November 2014 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Respondent Post-Hearing Submission, 18 December 2014 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Claimant Post-Hearing Submission, 18 December 2014 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Transcript of Hearing on the Merits - Day One, 26 October 2014 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Transcript of Hearing on the Merits - Day Two, 27 October 2014 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Transcript of Hearing on the Merits - Day Three, 28 October 2014 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Transcript of Hearing on the Merits - Day Four, 29 October 2014 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Transcript of Hearing on the Merits - Day Five, 30 October 2014 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Transcript of Hearing on the Merits - Day Six, 31 October 2014 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Respondent Submission on Costs, Respondent Submission on Costs, 3 March 2015 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Claimant Statement of Costs, 3 March 2015 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Respondent Reply Submission on Costs, 26 March 2015 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Claimant Reply Statement of Costs, 26 March 2015 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Tribunal Letter Inviting Submissions on the Bilcon Award, 4 May 2015 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Claimant Observations on the Bilcon Award, 14 May 2015 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, United States of America Submission on the Bilcon Award, 12 June 2015 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Mexico Submission on the Bilcon Award, 12 June 2015 Mesa Power Group LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-17, Canada Obse", "field_61": "20110706 20121120 20120731 20121121 20111004 20121203 20121224 20130118 20130328 20130712 20130823 20130219 20140305 20140410 20140509 20131120 20131119 20131118 20140228 20140528 20140616 20140624 20140430 20140428 20140427 20140429 20140725 20140704 20140702 20140627 20140818 20140904 20141003 20141020 20141110 20141218 20141026 20141027 20141028 20141029 20141030 20141031 20150303 20150326 20150504 20150514 20150612 20150626 20160324 20160613 20160601 20170615 20121012 20150519", "field_62": "234", "field_299": "15536", "Filename": "db://FE_SelectDisputeViewForContegraSearch#RowId=933", "field_102": "2413,2989,4094,4347,5022,5023,8134", "field_103": "652,652,664,652,652,664,652", "field_104": "3085,3269,3381,4460,4473,4474,4475,5021,8071,8151", "field_105": "900,900,900,900,900,900,900,900,900,900", "field_150": "21680,21682,21683 21679,21682,21683 21679,21680" }, "paragraphs": null, "hitCount": 0, "highlightedFields": null }, { "fields": { "rowid": "23 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 7791 7792 7793", "disputeid": "12422", "disputecitation": "Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4)", "fullcitation": "Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4)", "disputestartdate": "20071219", "isdisputecitation": "1", "modifiedon": "20210224", "field_respondentstates": "Canada", "field_100": "12802,13191", "field_101": "578,578", "field_106": "14297", "field_108": "403", "field_109": "403", "field_110": "20071219", "field_145": "332", "field_67": "Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada", "field_68": "ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4", "field_69": "12324", "field_70": "11085", "field_71": "AF/0023", "field_72": "Mobil and Murphy v. Canada", "field_73": "Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4)", "field_74": "1857", "field_77": "2043", "field_78": "112", "field_82": "2522", "field_83": "113", "contenttypedatamasterid": "13995 13996 13997 13998 13999 14003 14004 14005 14006 14007 14008 14009 14010 14011 14012 14013 14014 14015 14016 14017 14018 14019 14020 14021 14022 14023 14024 14025 14026 14027 14028 14029 23076 23077 23078", "field_documenttypeid": "1076 1075 1079 1077 1072 1078 1081 1074 1067", "field_137": "True", "field_56": "14324", "field_57": "AF/0023/01 AF/0023/02 AF/0023/03 AF/0023/04 AF/0023/05 AF/0023/07 AF/0023/08 AF/0023/09 AF/0023/10 AF/0023/11 AF/0023/12 AF/0023/13 AF/0023/14 AF/0023/15 AF/0023/16 AF/0023/17 AF/0023/18 AF/0023/19 AF/0023/20 AF/0023/21 AF/0023/22 AF/0023/23 AF/0023/24 AF/0023/25 AF/0023/26 AF/0023/27 AF/0023/28 AF/0023/29 AF/0023/30 AF/0023/31 AF/0023/32 AF/0023/33 AF/0023/34 AF/0023/35 AF/0023/36", "field_58": "Notice of Intent to Submit a Claim to Arbitration Notice of Arbitration Claimants' Memorial Counter Memorial Rejoinder Mexico 1128 Submission United States 1128 Submission Claimants' Reply to 1128 Submissions of Mexico and United States Respondent's Reply to 1128 Submissions of Mexico and United States Minutes of the First Session Procedural Order No. 1 (Decision on Place of Arbitration) Decision on Liability and on Principles of Quantum [Redacted] Partial Dissenting Opinion of Professor Philippe Sands Q.C. Claimants Updated Damages Calculations United States Second 1128 Submission Claimants Response to Second 1128 Submissions Respondent Response to Second 1128 Submissions Procedural Order No. 2 (Decision on the Court of the Place of Arbitration) Respondent Response to the Claimants Updated Damages Calculations Claimant Post Hearing Brief Mexico Second 1128 Submission Claimants Reply to Respondent Post-Hearing Submission Respondent Reply to the Claimants Post-Hearing Brief Transcript of Hearing on the Merits - Day One Transcript of Hearing on the Merits - Day Two Transcript of Hearing on the Merits - Day Three Transcript of Hearing on the Merits - Day Four Notice of Set Aside Application Award [Redacted] Declaration by Professor Philippe Sands Q.C. Judgment of Ontario Superior Court of Justice Claimants' Reply [Part A] Claimants' Reply [Part B] Claimants' Reply [Part C]", "field_59": "Mobil and Murphy v. Canada Notice of Intent to Submit a Claim to Arbitration Mobil and Murphy v. Canada Notice of Arbitration Mobil and Murphy v. Canada Claimants' Memorial Mobil and Murphy v. Canada Counter Memorial Mobil and Murphy v. Canada Rejoinder Mobil and Murphy v. Canada Mexico 1128 Submission Mobil and Murphy v. Canada United States 1128 Submission Mobil and Murphy v. Canada Claimants' Reply to 1128 Submissions of Mexico and United States Mobil and Murphy v. Canada Respondent's Reply to 1128 Submissions of Mexico and United States Mobil and Murphy v. Canada Minutes of the First Session Mobil and Murphy v. Canada Procedural Order No. 1 (Decision on Place of Arbitration) Mobil and Murphy v. Canada Decision on Liability and on Principles of Quantum [Redacted] Mobil and Murphy v. Canada Partial Dissenting Opinion of Professor Philippe Sands Q.C. Mobil and Murphy v. Canada Claimants Updated Damages Calculations Mobil and Murphy v. Canada United States Second 1128 Submission Mobil and Murphy v. Canada Claimants Response to Second 1128 Submissions Mobil and Murphy v. Canada Respondent Response to Second 1128 Submissions Mobil and Murphy v. Canada Procedural Order No. 2 (Decision on the Court of the Place of Arbitration) Mobil and Murphy v. Canada Respondent Response to the Claimants Updated Damages Calculations Mobil and Murphy v. Canada Claimant Post Hearing Brief Mobil and Murphy v. Canada Mexico Second 1128 Submission Mobil and Murphy v. Canada Claimants Reply to Respondent Post-Hearing Submission Mobil and Murphy v. Canada Respondent Reply to the Claimants Post-Hearing Brief Mobil and Murphy v. Canada Transcript of Hearing on the Merits - Day One Mobil and Murphy v. Canada Transcript of Hearing on the Merits - Day Two Mobil and Murphy v. Canada Transcript of Hearing on the Merits - Day Three Mobil and Murphy v. Canada Transcript of Hearing on the Merits - Day Four Mobil and Murphy v. Canada Notice of Set Aside Application Mobil and Murphy v. Canada Award [Redacted] Mobil and Murphy v. Canada Declaration by Professor Philippe Sands Q.C. Mobil and Murphy v. Canada Judgment of Ontario Superior Court of Justice Mobil and Murphy v. Canada Claimants' Reply [Part A] Mobil and Murphy v. Canada Claimants' Reply [Part B] Mobil and Murphy v. Canada Claimants' Reply [Part C]", "field_60": "Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4, Notice of Intent to Submit a Claim to Arbitration, 2 August 2007 Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4, Notice of Intent to Submit a Claim to Arbitration, 7 August 2007 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4, Notice of Arbitration, 1 November 2007 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4, Claimants' Memorial, 3 August 2009 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4, Counter Memorial, 1 December 2009 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4, Rejoinder, 9 June 2010 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4, 1128 Submission [Spanish/English], 8 July 2010 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4, United States 1128 Submission, 8 July 2010 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4, Claimants' Reply to 1128 Submissions of Mexico and United States, 1 September 2010 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4, Respondent's Reply to 1128 Submissions of Mexico and United States, 1 September 2010 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4, Minutes of the First Session, 6 May 2009 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4, Procedural Order No. 1 (Decision on Place of Arbitration), 7 October 2009 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4, Decision on Liability and on Principles of Quantum, 22 May 2012 [Redacted] Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4, Partial Dissenting Opinion of Professor Philippe Sands Q.C., 22 May 2012 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4, Claimants Updated Damages Calculations, 6 August 2010 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4, United States Second 1128 Submission, 21 January 2011 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4, Claimants Response to Second 1128 Submissions, 7 February 2011 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4, Respondent Response to Second 1128 Submissions, 7 February 2011 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4, Procedural Order No. 2 (Decision on the Court of the Place of Arbitration), 5 November 2009 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4, Respondent Response to the Claimants Updated Damages Calculations, 8 September 2010 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4, Claimant Post Hearing Brief, 7 January 2011 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4, Mexico Second 1128 Submission, 21 January 2011 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4, Claimants Reply to Respondent Post-Hearing Submission, 31 January 2011 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4, Respondent Reply to the Claimants Post-Hearing Brief, 31 January 2011 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4, Transcript of Hearing on the Merits - Day One, 19 October 2010 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4, Transcript of Hearing on the Merits - Day Two, 20 October 2010 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4, Transcript of Hearing on the Merits - Day Three, 21 October 2010 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4, Transcript of Hearing on the Merits - Day Four, 22 October 2010 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4, Notice of Set Aside Application, 19 May 2015 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4, Award, 20 February 2015 [Redacted] Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4, Declaration by Professor Philippe Sands Q.C., 20 February 2015 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4, Judgment of Ontario Superior Court of Justice, 16 February 2016 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4, Claimants' Reply, 8 April 2010 [Part A] Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4, Claimants' Reply, 8 April 2010 [Part B] Mobil Investments Canada Inc. and Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/07/4, Claimants' Reply, 8 April 2010 [Part C]", "field_61": "20070802 20070807 20071101 20090803 20091201 20100609 20100709 20100708 20100901 20090506 20091007 20120522 20100806 20110121 20110207 20091105 20100908 20110107 20110131 20101019 20101020 20101021 20101022 20150519 20150220 20160216 20100408", "field_62": "234 249", "field_299": "15536", "Filename": "db://FE_SelectDisputeViewForContegraSearch#RowId=23", "field_102": "2489,2583,2867,3363,3364,3365,3366,3367,3370,4849,5218,7368,7704,7739,7857,8042", "field_103": "875,1439,875,875,875,875,986,1439,986,1724,986,986,986,986,1594,1724", "field_104": "2416,3010,3368,3369,3371,3372,3373,3374,3378,4460,4850,8071,8076", "field_105": "900,889,900,900,900,1448,900,1545,1545,900,889,900,900", "field_111": "90", "field_112": "106", "field_75": "281", "field_107": "25993", "field_150": "15938 15937 15956 15954" }, "paragraphs": null, "hitCount": 0, "highlightedFields": null }, { "fields": { "rowid": "310 2681 2682 2683 2684 2685 2686 2687 2688 2689 2690 2691 2692 2693 2694 2695 2696 2697 2698 2699 2700 2701 2702 2703 2704 2705 2706 2707 2708 2709 2710 2711 2712 2713 2714 2715 2716", "disputeid": "12711", "disputecitation": "Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Government of Canada (ICSID Case No. ARB/15/6)", "fullcitation": "Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Government of Canada (ICSID Case No. ARB/15/6)", "disputestartdate": "20150218", "isdisputecitation": "1", "modifiedon": "20210225", "field_respondentstates": "Canada", "field_100": "13191", "field_101": "578", "field_106": "14289", "field_108": "578", "field_109": "403", "field_110": "20150218", "field_67": "Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Government of Canada", "field_68": "ICSID Case No. ARB/15/6", "field_69": "12324", "field_70": "11072", "field_71": "IC/0238", "field_72": "Mobil v. Canada", "field_73": "Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Government of Canada (ICSID Case No. ARB/15/6)", "field_74": "2393", "field_77": "1865", "field_78": "112", "field_82": "2390", "field_83": "113", "contenttypedatamasterid": "16374 16375 16376 16377 16378 16379 16380 16381 16382 16383 16384 16385 16386 16387 16388 16389 16390 16391 16392 16393 16394 16395 16396 16397 16398 16399 16400 16401 16402 16403 16404 16405 16406 16407 16408 16409", "field_documenttypeid": "1076 1075 1080 1079 1077 1071", "field_137": "True", "field_56": "14613", "field_57": "IC/0238/01 IC/0238/02 IC/0238/03 IC/0238/04 IC/0238/05 IC/0238/06 IC/0238/07 IC/0238/08 IC/0238/09 IC/0238/10 IC/0238/11 IC/0238/12 IC/0238/13 IC/0238/14 IC/0238/15 IC/0238/16 IC/0238/17 IC/0238/18 IC/0238/19 IC/0238/20 IC/0238/21 IC/0238/22 IC/0238/23 IC/0238/24 IC/0238/25 IC/0238/26 IC/0238/27 IC/0238/28 IC/0238/29 IC/0238/30 IC/0238/31 IC/0238/32 IC/0238/33 IC/0238/34 IC/0238/35 IC/0238/36", "field_58": "Notice of Intent Annex A to Notice of Intent Annex B to Notice of Intent Request for Arbitration Procedural Order No. 1 Procedural Order No. 2 on Confidentiality Procedural Order No. 3 on the Production of Documents Procedural Order No. 4 Procedural Order No. 6 Procedural Order No. 5 Procedural Order No. 7 Procedural Order No. 8 Claimant Memorial Respondent Counter-Memorial Respondent Counter-Memorial Appendix A Claimant Reply Memorial Claimant Reply Memorial Appendices Respondent Rejoinder Respondent Rejoinder Appendix A Claimant Post-Hearing Brief Respondent Post-Hearing Submission Claimant Reply to Respondent Post-Hearing Submission Respondent Reply to Claimant Post-Hearing Brief Submission of the United States of America Submission of Mexico Pursuant to NAFTA Article 1128 Claimant Reply to Article 1128 Submissions of the United States and Mexico Respondent Response to Article 1128 Submissions of the United States and Mexico Hearing Transcript - Volume 1 Hearing Transcript - Volume 2 Hearing Transcript - Volume 3 Hearing Transcript - Volume 4 Claimant Submission on Costs Respondent Submission on Costs Decision on Jurisdiction and Admissibility Procedural Order No. 9 Consent Award", "field_59": "Mobil v. Canada Notice of Intent Mobil v. Canada Annex A to Notice of Intent Mobil v. Canada Annex B to Notice of Intent Mobil v. Canada Request for Arbitration Mobil v. Canada Procedural Order No. 1 Mobil v. Canada Procedural Order No. 2 on Confidentiality Mobil v. Canada Procedural Order No. 3 on the Production of Documents Mobil v. Canada Procedural Order No. 4 Mobil v. Canada Procedural Order No. 6 Mobil v. Canada Procedural Order No. 5 Mobil v. Canada Procedural Order No. 7 Mobil v. Canada Procedural Order No. 8 Mobil v. Canada Claimant Memorial Mobil v. Canada Respondent Counter-Memorial Mobil v. Canada Respondent Counter-Memorial Appendix A Mobil v. Canada Claimant Reply Memorial Mobil v. Canada Claimant Reply Memorial Appendices Mobil v. Canada Respondent Rejoinder Mobil v. Canada Respondent Rejoinder Appendix A Mobil v. Canada Claimant Post-Hearing Brief Mobil v. Canada Respondent Post-Hearing Submission Mobil v. Canada Claimant Reply to Respondent Post-Hearing Submission Mobil v. Canada Respondent Reply to Claimant Post-Hearing Brief Mobil v. Canada Submission of the United States of America Mobil v. Canada Submission of Mexico Pursuant to NAFTA Article 1128 Mobil v. Canada Claimant Reply to Article 1128 Submissions of the United States and Mexico Mobil v. Canada Respondent Response to Article 1128 Submissions of the United States and Mexico Mobil v. Canada Hearing Transcript - Volume 1 Mobil v. Canada Hearing Transcript - Volume 2 Mobil v. Canada Hearing Transcript - Volume 3 Mobil v. Canada Hearing Transcript - Volume 4 Mobil v. Canada Claimant Submission on Costs Mobil v. Canada Respondent Submission on Costs Mobil v. Canada Decision on Jurisdiction and Admissibility Mobil v. Canada Procedural Order No. 9 Mobil v. Canada Consent Award", "field_60": "Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/6, Notice of Intent, 16 October 2014 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/6, Annex A to Notice of Intent, 16 October 2014 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/6, Annex B to Notice of Intent, 16 October 2014 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/6, Request for Arbitration, 16 January 2015 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/6, Procedural Order No. 1, 24 November 2015 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/6, Procedural Order No. 2 on Confidentiality, 24 November 2015 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/6, Procedural Order No. 3 on the Production of Documents, 10 February 2016 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/6, Procedural Order No. 4, 18 May 2016 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/6, Procedural Order No. 6, 4 October 2016 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/6, Procedural Order No. 5, 19 August 2016 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/6, Procedural Order No. 7, 17 November 2016 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/6, Procedural Order No. 8, 21 June 2017 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/6, Claimant Memorial, 11 March 2016 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/6, Respondent Counter-Memorial, 30 June 2016 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/6, Respondent Counter-Memorial Appendix A, 30 June 2016 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/6, Claimant Reply Memorial, 23 September 2016 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/6, Claimant Reply Memorial Appendices, 23 September 2016 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/6, Respondent Rejoinder, 16 December 2016 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/6, Respondent Rejoinder Appendix A, 16 December 2016 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/6, Claimant Post-Hearing Brief, 11 August 2017 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/6, Respondent Post-Hearing Submission, 11 August 2017 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/6, Claimant Reply to Respondent Post-Hearing Submission, 8 September 2017 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/6, Respondent Reply to Claimant Post-Hearing Brief, 8 September 2017 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/6, Submission of the United States of America, 24 October 2017 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/6, Submission of Mexico Pursuant to NAFTA Article 1128, 7 November 2017 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/6, Claimant Reply to Article 1128 Submissions of the United States and Mexico, 14 December 2017 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/6, Respondent Response to Article 1128 Submissions of the United States and Mexico, 14 December 2017 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/6, Hearing Transcript - Volume 1, 24 July 2017 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/6, Hearing Transcript - Volume 2, 25 July 2017 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/6, Hearing Transcript - Volume 3, 26 July 2017 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/6, Hearing Transcript - Volume 4, 28 July 2017 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/6, Claimant Submission on Costs, 15 September 2017 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/6, Respondent Submission on Costs, 15 September 2017 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/6, Decision on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 13 July 2018 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/6, Procedural Order No. 9, 11 December 2018 Mobil Investments Canada Inc. v. Canada, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/6, Consent Award, 4 February 2020", "field_61": "20141016 20150116 20151124 20160210 20160518 20161004 20160819 20161117 20170621 20160311 20160630 20160923 20161216 20170811 20170908 20171024 20171107 20171214 20170724 20170725 20170726 20170728 20170915 20180713 20181211 20200204", "field_62": "234", "Filename": "db://FE_SelectDisputeViewForContegraSearch#RowId=310", "field_102": "24487,2489,3035,3364,3365,5575,6385,6389,6390,6394,6400,6403,7368", "field_103": "1459,875,1459,875,875,986,1459,1459,1459,986,1459,1459,986", "field_104": "3368,4460,5412,5666,7488,8076", "field_105": "900,900,900,900,900,900" }, "paragraphs": null, "hitCount": 0, "highlightedFields": null }, { "fields": { "rowid": "39 596 597 598", "disputeid": "12438", "disputecitation": "Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada", "fullcitation": "Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada", "isdisputecitation": "1", "modifiedon": "20210113", "field_respondentstates": "Canada", "field_109": "403", "field_67": "Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada", "field_69": "12324", "field_71": "AF/0039", "field_72": "Murphy v. Canada", "field_73": "Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada", "contenttypedatamasterid": "14271 14272 14273", "field_documenttypeid": "1076", "field_137": "True", "field_56": "14340", "field_57": "AF/0039/01 AF/0039/02 AF/0039/03", "field_58": "Notice of Intent Annex A to Notice of Intent Annex B to Notice of Intent", "field_59": "Murphy v. Canada Notice of Intent Murphy v. Canada Annex A to Notice of Intent Murphy v. Canada Annex B to Notice of Intent", "field_60": "Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada, Notice of Intent, 16 October 2014 Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada, Annex A to Notice of Intent, 16 October 2014 Murphy Oil Corporation v. Government of Canada, Annex B to Notice of Intent, 16 October 2014", "field_61": "20141016", "field_62": "234", "Filename": "db://FE_SelectDisputeViewForContegraSearch#RowId=39" }, "paragraphs": null, "hitCount": 0, "highlightedFields": null }, { "fields": { "rowid": "1028 7209", "disputeid": "13432", "disputecitation": "OmniTRAX Enterprises Inc. and others v. Government of Canada", "fullcitation": "OmniTRAX Enterprises Inc. and others v. Government of Canada", "isdisputecitation": "1", "field_respondentstates": "Canada", "field_109": "403", "field_67": "OmniTRAX Enterprises Inc. and others v. Government of Canada", "field_69": "12324", "field_71": "UN/0160", "field_72": "OmniTRAX v. Canada", "field_73": "OmniTRAX Enterprises Inc. and others v. Government of Canada", "contenttypedatamasterid": "20973", "field_documenttypeid": "1076", "field_137": "True", "field_56": "15334", "field_57": "UN/0160/01", "field_58": "Notice of Intent to Submit a Claim to Arbitration under NAFTA Chapter 11", "field_59": "OmniTRAX v. Canada Notice of Intent to Submit a Claim to Arbitration under NAFTA Chapter 11", "field_60": "OmniTRAX Enterprises Inc. and others v. Canada, Notice of Intent to Submit a Claim to Arbitration under NAFTA Chapter 11, 14 November 2017", "field_61": "20171114", "field_62": "234", "Filename": "db://FE_SelectDisputeViewForContegraSearch#RowId=1028" }, "paragraphs": null, "hitCount": 0, "highlightedFields": null }, { "fields": { "rowid": "889 5080 5081 5082 5083 5084 5085 5086 5087 5088 5089 5090 5091 5092 5093 5094 5095 5096 5097 5098 5099 5100 5101 5102 5103 5104 5105 5106 5107 5108 5109 5110 5111 5112 5113 5114 5115 5116 5117 5118 5119 5120 5121 5122 5123 5124 5125 5126 5127 5128 5129 5130 5131 5132 5133 5134 5135 5136 5137 5138 5139 5140 5141 5142 5143 5144 5145 5146 5147 5148 5149 5150 5151 5152 5153 5154 5155 5156 7974 7975 7976 7977", "disputeid": "13292", "disputecitation": "Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada", "fullcitation": "Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada", "disputestartdate": "19990325", "isdisputecitation": "1", "modifiedon": "20210213", "field_respondentstates": "Canada", "field_100": "13656", "field_101": "578", "field_106": "14282", "field_108": "403", "field_109": "403", "field_110": "19990325", "field_145": "332", "field_67": "Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada", "field_69": "12324", "field_70": "11086", "field_71": "UN/0020", "field_72": "Pope & Talbot v. Canada", "field_73": "Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada", "field_74": "1941", "field_77": "1942", "field_78": "112", "field_82": "1915", "field_83": "113", "contenttypedatamasterid": "18799 18800 18802 18803 18804 18805 18806 18807 18808 18809 18810 18811 18812 18813 18814 18815 18816 18817 18818 18819 18820 18821 18822 18823 18824 18825 18826 18827 18828 18829 18831 18832 18833 18834 18835 18836 18837 18838 18839 18840 18841 18842 18843 18844 18845 18846 18851 18852 18853 18854 18855 18856 18857 18858 18859 18860 18861 18862 18863 18864 18865 18866 18867 18868 18869 18870 18871 18872 18873 18874 18875 18876 18877 18878 18879 18880 18881 23259 23260 23261 23262", "field_documenttypeid": "1071 1080 1078 1077 1072 1064 1070 1076 1075 1079", "field_137": "True", "field_56": "15194", "field_57": "UN/0020/01 UN/0020/02 UN/0020/04 UN/0020/05 UN/0020/07 UN/0020/08 UN/0020/09 UN/0020/10 UN/0020/12 UN/0020/13 UN/0020/14 UN/0020/15 UN/0020/16 UN/0020/17 UN/0020/18 UN/0020/19 UN/0020/21 UN/0020/22 UN/0020/23 UN/0020/24 UN/0020/25 UN/0020/26 UN/0020/27 UN/0020/28 UN/0020/29 UN/0020/30 UN/0020/31 UN/0020/32 UN/0020/33 UN/0020/34 UN/0020/37 UN/0020/38 UN/0020/39 UN/0020/40 UN/0020/41 UN/0020/42 UN/0020/43 UN/0020/44 UN/0020/45 UN/0020/46 UN/0020/47 UN/0020/48 UN/0020/49 UN/0020/50 UN/0020/51 UN/0020/52 UN/0020/55 UN/0020/56 UN/0020/57 UN/0020/58 UN/0020/59 UN/0020/60 UN/0020/61 UN/0020/62 UN/0020/63 UN/0020/64 UN/0020/65 UN/0020/66 UN/0020/67 UN/0020/68 UN/0020/69 UN/0020/70 UN/0020/71 UN/0020/72 UN/0020/73 UN/0020/74 UN/0020/75 UN/0020/76 UN/0020/77 UN/0020/78 UN/0020/79 UN/0020/80 UN/0020/81 UN/0020/82 UN/0020/83 UN/0020/84 UN/0020/85 UN/0020/86 UN/0020/87 UN/0020/88 UN/0020/89", "field_58": "Decision on Motion to Dismiss Claim Award on Harmac Motion Decision to Amend Procedural Order 5 (Confidentiality) Interim Award Decision on Motion Regarding Superfee Decision Award Letter from Principal Counsel Tribunal Letter to Disputing Parties Interim Order by Arbitral Tribunal Decision and Order by the Arbitral Tribunal Ruling Concerning the Investor's Motion to Change the Place of Arbitration Letter from the Tribunal Award on Damages Amended Procedural Order on Confidentiality No. 5 Final Award Procedural Order 1 Procedural Order 2 Procedural Order 3 Procedural Order 4 Procedural Order 5 Procedural Order 6 Procedural Order 7 Procedural Order 8 Procedural Order 9 Procedural Order 10 Procedural Order 11 Decision on Claimant's Motion for Interim Measures Notice of Intent Notice of Arbitration Statement of Claim Statement of Defence Mexico First Article 1128 Submission Respondent Reply on Preliminary Motions Claimant Memorial (Initial Phase) Respondent Counter-Memorial Mexico Second Article 1128 Submission United States First Article 1128 Submission Claimant Supplemental Memorial (Initial Phase) United States Second Article 1128 Submission Mexico Supplemental Article 1128 Submission Respondent Response on Article 1128 Submissions Claimant Response on Article 1128 Submissions United States Third Article 1128 Submission Claimant Supplemental Memorial (Second Phase) United States Fourth Article 1128 Submission Mexico Third Article 1128 Submission Respondent Supplemental Counter-Memorial (Second Phase) United States Fifth Article 1128 Submission Mexico Fourth Article 1128 Submission Claimant Statement of Claim (Damages Phase) Respondent Statement of Defense (Damages Phase) Claimant Reply Memorial (Damages Phase) Mexico Fifth Article 1128 Submission United States Sixth Article 1128 Submission Respondent Reply Counter-Memorial United States Seventh Article 1128 Submission Mexico Sixth Article 1128 Submission United States Eighth Article 1128 Submission Mexico Seventh Article 1128 Submission Claimant Post-Hearing Submissions (Damages Phase) Respondent Post-Hearing Submissions (Damages Phase) Respondent Reply to Post-Hearing Submissions (Damages Phase) Claimant Reply to Post-Hearing Submissions (Damages Phase) Respondent Letter to Tribunal Claimant Response to Tribunal Letter Respondent Response to Tribunal Letter Mexico Response to Tribunal Letter Canada Response to Article 1128 Submissions Claimant Memorial (Second Phase) [Part A] Claimant Memorial (Second Phase) [Part B] Respondent Counter-Memorial (Second Phase) [Part A] Respondent Counter-Memorial (Second Phase) [Part B]", "field_59": "Pope & Talbot v. Canada Decision on Motion to Dismiss Claim Pope & Talbot v. Canada Award on Harmac Motion Pope & Talbot v. Canada Decision to Amend Procedural Order 5 (Confidentiality) Pope & Talbot v. Canada Interim Award Pope & Talbot v. Canada Decision on Motion Regarding Superfee Pope & Talbot v. Canada Decision Pope & Talbot v. Canada Award Pope & Talbot v. Canada Letter from Principal Counsel Pope & Talbot v. Canada Tribunal Letter to Disputing Parties Pope & Talbot v. Canada Interim Order by Arbitral Tribunal Pope & Talbot v. Canada Decision and Order by the Arbitral Tribunal Pope & Talbot v. Canada Ruling Concerning the Investor's Motion to Change the Place of Arbitration Pope & Talbot v. Canada Letter from the Tribunal Pope & Talbot v. Canada Award on Damages Pope & Talbot v. Canada Amended Procedural Order on Confidentiality No. 5 Pope & Talbot v. Canada Final Award Pope & Talbot v. Canada Procedural Order 1 Pope & Talbot v. Canada Procedural Order 2 Pope & Talbot v. Canada Procedural Order 3 Pope & Talbot v. Canada Procedural Order 4 Pope & Talbot v. Canada Procedural Order 5 Pope & Talbot v. Canada Procedural Order 6 Pope & Talbot v. Canada Procedural Order 7 Pope & Talbot v. Canada Procedural Order 8 Pope & Talbot v. Canada Procedural Order 9 Pope & Talbot v. Canada Procedural Order 10 Pope & Talbot v. Canada Procedural Order 11 Pope & Talbot v. Canada Decision on Claimant's Motion for Interim Measures Pope & Talbot v. Canada Notice of Intent Pope & Talbot v. Canada Notice of Arbitration Pope & Talbot v. Canada Statement of Claim Pope & Talbot v. Canada Statement of Defence Pope & Talbot v. Canada Mexico First Article 1128 Submission Pope & Talbot v. Canada Respondent Reply on Preliminary Motions Pope & Talbot v. Canada Claimant Memorial (Initial Phase) Pope & Talbot v. Canada Respondent Counter-Memorial Pope & Talbot v. Canada Mexico Second Article 1128 Submission Pope & Talbot v. Canada United States First Article 1128 Submission Pope & Talbot v. Canada Claimant Supplemental Memorial (Initial Phase) Pope & Talbot v. Canada United States Second Article 1128 Submission Pope & Talbot v. Canada Mexico Supplemental Article 1128 Submission Pope & Talbot v. Canada Respondent Response on Article 1128 Submissions Pope & Talbot v. Canada Claimant Response on Article 1128 Submissions Pope & Talbot v. Canada United States Third Article 1128 Submission Pope & Talbot v. Canada Claimant Supplemental Memorial (Second Phase) Pope & Talbot v. Canada United States Fourth Article 1128 Submission Pope & Talbot v. Canada Mexico Third Article 1128 Submission Pope & Talbot v. Canada Respondent Supplemental Counter-Memorial (Second Phase) Pope & Talbot v. Canada United States Fifth Article 1128 Submission Pope & Talbot v. Canada Mexico Fourth Article 1128 Submission Pope & Talbot v. Canada Claimant Statement of Claim (Damages Phase) Pope & Talbot v. Canada Respondent Statement of Defense (Damages Phase) Pope & Talbot v. Canada Claimant Reply Memorial (Damages Phase) Pope & Talbot v. Canada Mexico Fifth Article 1128 Submission Pope & Talbot v. Canada United States Sixth Article 1128 Submission Pope & Talbot v. Canada Respondent Reply Counter-Memorial Pope & Talbot v. Canada United States Seventh Article 1128 Submission Pope & Talbot v. Canada Mexico Sixth Article 1128 Submission Pope & Talbot v. Canada United States Eighth Article 1128 Submission Pope & Talbot v. Canada Mexico Seventh Article 1128 Submission Pope & Talbot v. Canada Claimant Post-Hearing Submissions (Damages Phase) Pope & Talbot v. Canada Respondent Post-Hearing Submissions (Damages Phase) Pope & Talbot v. Canada Respondent Reply to Post-Hearing Submissions (Damages Phase) Pope & Talbot v. Canada Claimant Reply to Post-Hearing Submissions (Damages Phase) Pope & Talbot v. Canada Respondent Letter to Tribunal Pope & Talbot v. Canada Claimant Response to Tribunal Letter Pope & Talbot v. Canada Respondent Response to Tribunal Letter Pope & Talbot v. Canada Mexico Response to Tribunal Letter Pope & Talbot v. Canada Canada Response to Article 1128 Submissions Pope & Talbot v. Canada Claimant Memorial (Second Phase) [Part A] Pope & Talbot v. Canada Claimant Memorial (Second Phase) [Part B] Pope & Talbot v. Canada Respondent Counter-Memorial (Second Phase) [Part A] Pope & Talbot v. Canada Respondent Counter-Memorial (Second Phase) [Part B]", "field_60": "Pope & Talbot Inc. and Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Award by Arbitral Tribunal in relation to Preliminary Motion by Government of Canada to Dismiss Claim Because it Falls Outside the Scope and Coverage of NAFTA Chapter Eleven \"measure relating to investment\" Motion, 26 January 2000 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Award on Harmac Motion, 24 February 2000 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Amendment to Procedural Order No. 5 (Procedural Order on Confidentiality), 2 April 2000 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Interim Award, 26 June 2000 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Decision on Motion Regarding Superfee, 7 August 2000 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Decision by Tribunal, 6 September 2000 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Decision by Arbitral Tribunal, 27 September 2000 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Award on the Merits of Phase 2, 10 April 2001 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Letter from Principal Counsel, 10 August 2001 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, (UNCITRAL), Tribunal Letter to Disputing Parties, 14 August 2001 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, (UNCITRAL), Tribunal Letter to Disputing Parties, 17 September 2001 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Interim Order by Arbitral Tribunal, 5 March 2002 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Decision and Order by the Arbitral Tribunal, 11 March 2002 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Ruling Concerning the Investor's Motion to Change the Place of Arbitration, 14 March 2002 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Letter from the Tribunal, 21 March 2002 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Award in Respect of Damages, 31 May 2002 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Amended Procedural Order on Confidentiality No. 5, 17 September 2002 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Award in Respect of Costs by Arbitral Tribunal, 26 November 2002 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, (UNCITRAL), Procedural Order No. 1, 29 October 1999 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, (UNCITRAL), Procedural Order No. 2, 28 October 1999 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, (UNCITRAL), Procedural Order No. 3, 29 October 1999 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, (UNCITRAL), Procedural Order No. 4, 29 October 1999 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Procedural Order on Confidentiality No. 5, 17 December 1999 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, (UNCITRAL), Procedural Order No. 6, 17 December 1999 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, (UNCITRAL), Procedural Order No. 7, 19 January 2000 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Procedural Order No. 8 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Procedural Order No. 9, 11 July 2000 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Procedural Order 10 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Procedural Order 11, 6 September 2000 Pope & Talbot Inc. and Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Ruling by Tribunal on Claimants Motion for Interim Measures, 26 January 2000 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Notice of Intent, 24 December 1998 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Notice of Arbitration, 25 March 1999 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Statement of Claim, 25 March 1999 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Statement of Defence, 8 October 1999 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Mexico First Article 1128 Submission, 2 December 1999 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Respondent Reply on Preliminary Motions, 7 December 1999 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Claimant Memorial (Initial Phase), 28 January 2000 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Respondent Counter-Memorial, 29 March 2000 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Mexico Second Article 1128 Submission, 3 April 2000 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, United States First Article 1128 Submission, 7 April 2000 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Claimant Supplemental Memorial (Initial Phase), 14 April 2000 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, United States Second Article 1128 Submission, 25 May 2000 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Mexico Supplemental Article 1128 Submission, 25 May 2000 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Respondent Response on Article 1128 Submissions, 1 June 2000 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Claimant Response on Article 1128 Submissions, 1 June 2000 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, United States Third Article 1128 Submission, 24 July 2000 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Claimant Supplemental Memorial (Second Phase), 25 October 2000 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, United States Fourth Article 1128 Submission, 1 November 2000 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Mexico Third Article 1128 Submission, 5 November 2000 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Respondent Supplemental Counter-Memorial (Second Phase), 7 November 2000 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, United States Fifth Article 1128 Submission, 1 December 2000 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Mexico Fourth Article 1128 Submission, 1 December 2000 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Respondent Response on Article 1128 Submissions, 15 December 2000 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Claimant Statement of Claim (Damages Phase), 15 June 2001 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Respondent Statement of Defense (Damages Phase), 18 August 2001 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Claimant Reply Memorial (Damages Phase), 17 September 2001 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Mexico Fifth Article 1128 Submission, 2 October 2001 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, United States Sixth Article 1128 Submission, 2 October 2001 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Respondent Reply Counter-Memorial, 5 October 2001 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, United States Seventh Article 1128 Submission, 6 November 2001 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Mexico Sixth Article 1128 Submission, 6 November 2001 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, United States Eighth Article 1128 Submission, 3 December 2001 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Mexico Seventh Article 1128 Submission, 3 December 2001 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Claimant Post-Hearing Submissions (Damages Phase), 14 December 2001 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Respondent Post-Hearing Submissions (Damages Phase), 14 December 2001 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Respondent Reply to Post-Hearing Submissions (Damages Phase), 21 December 2001 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Claimant Reply to Post-Hearing Submissions (Damages Phase), 21 December 2001 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Respondent Letter to Tribunal, 10 August 2001 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Claimant Response to Tribunal Letter, 10 September 2001 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Respondent Response to Tribunal Letter, 10 September 2001 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Respondent Response to Tribunal Letter, 1 October 2001 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Claimant Response to Tribunal Letter, 5 October 2001 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Mexico Response to Tribunal Letter, 1 October 2001 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Tribunal Letter to Disputing Parties, 23 October 2001 Pope & Talbot Inc. v. Government of Canada, UN", "field_61": "20000126 20000224 20000402 20000626 20000807 20000906 20000927 20010410 20010810 20010814 20010917 20020305 20020311 20020314 20020321 20020531 20020917 20021126 19991028 19991029 19991217 20000119 20000711 19981224 19990325 19991008 19991202 19991207 20000128 20000329 20000403 20000407 20000414 20000525 20000601 20000624 20001025 20001101 20001105 20001107 20001201 20001215 20010615 20010818 20011002 20011005 20011106 20011203 20011214 20011221 20010910 20011001 20011023 20011101 20000905 20001010", "field_62": "234", "Filename": "db://FE_SelectDisputeViewForContegraSearch#RowId=889", "field_102": "2413,8059", "field_103": "652,850", "field_104": "8069,8116,26160,1962,25991", "field_105": "900,889,850,850,886" }, "paragraphs": null, "hitCount": 0, "highlightedFields": null }, { "fields": { "rowid": "995 6856 6857 6858 6859 6860 6861 6862 6863 6864 6865 6866 6867 6868 6869 6870 6871 6872 6873 6874 6875 6876 6877 6878 6879 6880 6881 6882 6883 6884 6885 6886 6887 6888 6889 6890 6891 6892 6893 6894 6895 6896 6897 6898 6899 6900 6901 6902 6903 6904 6905 6906 6907 6908 6909 6910 6911 6912 6913 6914 6915 6916 6917 6918 8031 8032 8033 8034 8035 8036 8037", "disputeid": "13399", "disputecitation": "Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada (PCA Case No. 2016-13)", "fullcitation": "Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada (PCA Case No. 2016-13)", "isdisputecitation": "1", "modifiedon": "20210225", "field_respondentstates": "Canada", "field_100": "13786", "field_101": "578", "field_106": "14297", "field_108": "403", "field_109": "403", "field_67": "Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada", "field_68": "PCA Case No. 2016-13", "field_69": "12324", "field_70": "11090", "field_71": "UN/0127", "field_72": "Resolute Forest Products v. Canada", "field_73": "Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada (PCA Case No. 2016-13)", "field_74": "2521", "field_77": "1965", "field_78": "112", "field_82": "2167", "field_83": "113", "contenttypedatamasterid": "20620 20621 20622 20623 20624 20625 20626 20627 20628 20629 20630 20631 20632 20633 20634 20635 20636 20637 20638 20639 20640 20641 20642 20643 20644 20645 20646 20647 20648 20649 20650 20651 20652 20653 20654 20655 20656 20657 20658 20659 20660 20661 20662 20663 20664 20665 20666 20667 20668 20669 20670 20671 20672 20673 20674 20675 20676 20677 20678 20679 20680 20681 20682 23316 23317 23318 23319 23320 23321 23322", "field_documenttypeid": "1077 1076 1080 1079 1063 1071", "field_137": "True", "field_56": "15301", "field_57": "UN/0127/01 UN/0127/02 UN/0127/03 UN/0127/04 UN/0127/05 UN/0127/06 UN/0127/07 UN/0127/08 UN/0127/09 UN/0127/10 UN/0127/11 UN/0127/12 UN/0127/13 UN/0127/14 UN/0127/15 UN/0127/16 UN/0127/17 UN/0127/18 UN/0127/19 UN/0127/20 UN/0127/21 UN/0127/22 UN/0127/23 UN/0127/24 UN/0127/25 UN/0127/26 UN/0127/27 UN/0127/28 UN/0127/29 UN/0127/30 UN/0127/31 UN/0127/32 UN/0127/33 UN/0127/34 UN/0127/35 UN/0127/36 UN/0127/37 UN/0127/38 UN/0127/39 UN/0127/40 UN/0127/41 UN/0127/42 UN/0127/43 UN/0127/44 UN/0127/45 UN/0127/46 UN/0127/47 UN/0127/48 UN/0127/49 UN/0127/50 UN/0127/51 UN/0127/52 UN/0127/53 UN/0127/54 UN/0127/55 UN/0127/56 UN/0127/57 UN/0127/58 UN/0127/59 UN/0127/60 UN/0127/61 UN/0127/62 UN/0127/63 UN/0127/64 UN/0127/65 UN/0127/66 UN/0127/67 UN/0127/68 UN/0127/69 UN/0127/70", "field_58": "Press Release on Notice of Arbitration Notice of Intent Notice of Arbitration Procedural Order No. 1 Respondent Statement of Defence Respondent Request for Bifurcation Claimant Opposition to Request for Bifurcation Procedural Order No. 2 Confidentiality Order Procedural Order No. 3 re Scheduling Issues Procedural Order No. 4 re Decision on Bifurcation Procedural Order No. 5 re Scheduling Jurisdictional Phase Respondent Memorial on Jurisdiction Claimant Counter-Memorial on Jurisdiction Expert Witness Statement of Jerry Hausman Press Release on Notification to Non-Disputing Parties and Potential Amici Curiae I Respondent Reply Memorial on Jurisdiction Claimant Rejoinder Memorial on Jurisdiction Procedural Order No. 6 re Decision on Amicus Application Mexico Article 1128 Submissions on Jurisdiction United States Article 1128 Submissions on Jurisdiction Respondent Comments on Article 1128 Submissions from United States and Mexico Claimant Comments on Article 1128 Submissions from United States and Mexico Press Release re Hearing on Jurisdiction and Admissibility Transcript, Hearing on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, Day 1 Transcript, Hearing on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, Day 2 Decision on Jurisdiction and Admissibility Procedural Order No. 7 re Scheduling the Merits and Damages Phase Procedural Order No. 8 on Revised Schedule for the Merits and Damages Phase Procedural Order No. 9 on Document Production Claimant Memorial Expert Witness Report of Jerry Hausman I [Redacted] Expert Witness Report of Seth T. Kaplan I [Redacted] Procedural Order No. 10 on Further Revised Schedule for the Merits and Damages Phase Respondent Counter-Memorial on Merits and Damages Expert Opinion of Poyry Management Consulting Oy Expert Report of Peter Steger Witness Statement of Duff Montgomerie Witness Statement of Jeannie Chow Witness Statement of Julie Towers Witness Statement of Murray Coolican Procedural Order No. 11 on Further Document Production Procedural Order No. 12 on Further Revised Schedule for the Merits and Damages Phase Claimant Reply Memorial on the Merits and Damages [Redacted] Expert Witness Report of Dr. Kaplan II [Redacted] Expert Witness Report of Jerry Hausman II [Redacted] Witness Statement of M. Richard Garneau [Redacted] Expert Witness Statement of Ernst & Young Inc. Procedural Order No. 13 on the Designation of Certain Exhibits as Restricted Access Information [Redacted] Press Release on Notification to Non-Disputing Parties and Potential Amici Curiae II Press Release on Notification to Non-Disputing Parties and Potential Amici Curiae III Respondent Rejoinder Memorial on Merits and Damages Rejoinder Witness Statement of Jeannie Chow Rejoinder Witness Statement of Murray Coolican Rejoinder Witness Statement of Duff Montgomerie Rejoinder Witness Statement of Julie Towers Rejoinder Expert Report of Pöyry Management Consulting Oy Rejoinder Expert Report of Peter Steger Procedural Order No. 14 on a Further Revised Schedule for the Merits and Damages Phase United States Second Article 1128 Submission Mexico Second Article 1128 Submission Respondent Comments on Second Article 1128 Submissions of United States and Mexico Claimant Comments on Second Article 1128 Submissions of United States and Mexico [Redacted] Procedural Order No. 15 on a Further Revised Schedule for the Merits and Damages Phase PAC Press Release - Hearing on the Merits and Damages", "field_59": "Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Press Release on Notice of Arbitration Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Notice of Intent Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Notice of Arbitration Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Procedural Order No. 1 Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Respondent Statement of Defence Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Respondent Request for Bifurcation Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Claimant Opposition to Request for Bifurcation Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Procedural Order No. 2 Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Confidentiality Order Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Procedural Order No. 3 re Scheduling Issues Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Procedural Order No. 4 re Decision on Bifurcation Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Procedural Order No. 5 re Scheduling Jurisdictional Phase Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Respondent Memorial on Jurisdiction Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Claimant Counter-Memorial on Jurisdiction Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Expert Witness Statement of Jerry Hausman Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Press Release on Notification to Non-Disputing Parties and Potential Amici Curiae I Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Respondent Reply Memorial on Jurisdiction Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Claimant Rejoinder Memorial on Jurisdiction Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Procedural Order No. 6 re Decision on Amicus Application Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Mexico Article 1128 Submissions on Jurisdiction Resolute Forest Products v. Canada United States Article 1128 Submissions on Jurisdiction Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Respondent Comments on Article 1128 Submissions from United States and Mexico Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Claimant Comments on Article 1128 Submissions from United States and Mexico Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Press Release re Hearing on Jurisdiction and Admissibility Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Transcript, Hearing on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, Day 1 Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Transcript, Hearing on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, Day 2 Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Decision on Jurisdiction and Admissibility Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Procedural Order No. 7 re Scheduling the Merits and Damages Phase Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Procedural Order No. 8 on Revised Schedule for the Merits and Damages Phase Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Procedural Order No. 9 on Document Production Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Claimant Memorial Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Expert Witness Report of Jerry Hausman I [Redacted] Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Expert Witness Report of Seth T. Kaplan I [Redacted] Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Procedural Order No. 10 on Further Revised Schedule for the Merits and Damages Phase Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Respondent Counter-Memorial on Merits and Damages Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Expert Opinion of Poyry Management Consulting Oy Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Expert Report of Peter Steger Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Witness Statement of Duff Montgomerie Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Witness Statement of Jeannie Chow Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Witness Statement of Julie Towers Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Witness Statement of Murray Coolican Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Procedural Order No. 11 on Further Document Production Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Procedural Order No. 12 on Further Revised Schedule for the Merits and Damages Phase Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Claimant Reply Memorial on the Merits and Damages [Redacted] Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Expert Witness Report of Dr. Kaplan II [Redacted] Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Expert Witness Report of Jerry Hausman II [Redacted] Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Witness Statement of M. Richard Garneau [Redacted] Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Expert Witness Statement of Ernst & Young Inc. Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Procedural Order No. 13 on the Designation of Certain Exhibits as Restricted Access Information [Redacted] Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Press Release on Notification to Non-Disputing Parties and Potential Amici Curiae II Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Press Release on Notification to Non-Disputing Parties and Potential Amici Curiae III Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Respondent Rejoinder Memorial on Merits and Damages Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Rejoinder Witness Statement of Jeannie Chow Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Rejoinder Witness Statement of Murray Coolican Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Rejoinder Witness Statement of Duff Montgomerie Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Rejoinder Witness Statement of Julie Towers Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Rejoinder Expert Report of Pöyry Management Consulting Oy Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Rejoinder Expert Report of Peter Steger Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Procedural Order No. 14 on a Further Revised Schedule for the Merits and Damages Phase Resolute Forest Products v. Canada United States Second Article 1128 Submission Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Mexico Second Article 1128 Submission Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Respondent Comments on Second Article 1128 Submissions of United States and Mexico Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Claimant Comments on Second Article 1128 Submissions of United States and Mexico [Redacted] Resolute Forest Products v. Canada Procedural Order No. 15 on a Further Revised Schedule for the Merits and Damages Phase Resolute Forest Products v. Canada PAC Press Release - Hearing on the Merits and Damages", "field_60": "Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Press Release on Notice of Arbitration, 30 December 2015 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Products v. Canada Notice of Intent, 30 September 2015 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Notice of Arbitration, 30 December 2015 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Procedural Order No. 1, 29 June 2016 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Respondent Statement of Defence, 1 September 2016 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Respondent Request for Bifurcation, 29 September 2016 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Claimant Opposition to Request for Bifurcation, 13 October 2016 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Procedural Order No. 2, 14 October 2016 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Confidentiality Order, 14 October 2016 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Procedural Order No. 3 re Scheduling Issues, 3 November 2016 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Procedural Order No. 4 re Decision on Bifurcation, 18 November 2016 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Procedural Order No. 5 re Scheduling Jurisdictional Phase, 12 December 2016 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Respondent Memorial on Jurisdiction, 22 December 2016 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Claimant Counter-Memorial on Jurisdiction, 22 February 2017 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Expert Witness Statement of Jerry Hausman, 22 February 2017 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Press Release on Notification to Non-Disputing Parties and Potential Amici Curiae I, 8 May 2017 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Press Release on Notification to Non-Disputing Parties and Potential Amici Curiae I, 8 May 2017 [French] Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Respondent Reply Memorial on Jurisdiction, 29 March 2017 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Claimant Rejoinder Memorial on Jurisdiction, 3 May 2017 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Procedural Order No. 6 re Decision on Amicus Application, 29 June 2017 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Mexico Article 1128 Submissions on Jurisdiction, 14 June 2017 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, United States Article 1128 Submissions on Jurisdiction, 14 June 2017 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Respondent Comments on Article 1128 Submissions from United States and Mexico, 12 July 2017 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Claimant Comments on Article 1128 Submissions from United States and Mexico, 12 July 2017 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Press Release re Hearing on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 1 August 2017 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Press Release re Hearing on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 1 August 2017 [French] Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Transcript, Hearing on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, Day 1, 15 August 2017 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Transcript, Hearing on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, Day 2, 16 August 2017 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Decision on Jurisdiction and Admissibility, 30 January 2018 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Procedural Order No. 7 re Scheduling the Merits and Damages Phase, 23 March 2018 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Procedural Order No. 8 on Revised Schedule for the Merits and Damages Phase, 15 August 2018 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Procedural Order No. 9 on Document Production, 21 August 2018 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Claimant Memorial, 28 December 2018 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Expert Witness Report of Jerry Hausman I, 28 December 2018 [Redacted] Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Expert Witness Report of Seth T. Kaplan I, 28 December 2018 [Redacted] Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Procedural Order No. 10 on Further Revised Schedule for the Merits and Damages Phase, 19 February 2019 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Respondent Counter-Memorial on Merits and Damages, 17 April 2019 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Expert Opinion of Poyry Management Consulting Oy, 16 April 2019 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Expert Report of Peter Steger, 17 April 2019 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Witness Statement of Duff Montgomerie, 17 April 2019 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Witness Statement of Jeannie Chow, 17 April 2019 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Witness Statement of Julie Towers, 17 April 2019 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case no 2016-13, Witness Statement of Murray Coolican, 17 April 2019 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Procedural Order No. 11 on Further Document Production, 9 July 2019 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Procedural Order No. 12 on Further Revised Schedule for the Merits and Damages Phase, 18 November 2019 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Claimant Reply Memorial on the Merits and Damages, 6 December 2019 [Redacted] Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Expert Witness Report of Dr. Kaplan II, 6 December 2019 [Redacted] Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Expert Witness Report of Jerry Hausman II, 6 December 2019 [Redacted] Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Witness Statement of M. Richard Garneau, 6 December 2019 [Redacted] Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Expert Witness Statement of Ernst & Young Inc., 6 December 2019 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Procedural Order No. 13 on the Designation of Certain Exhibits as Restricted Access Information, 17 February 2020 [Redacted] Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Press Release on Notification to Non-Disputing Parties and Potential Amici Curiae II, 9 March 2020 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Press Release on Notification to Non-Disputing Parties and Potential Amici Curiae II, 9 March 2020 [French] Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Press Release on Notification to Non-Disputing Parties and Potential Amici Curiae III, 1 April 2020 Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Press Release on Notification to Non-Disputing Parties and Potential Amici Curiae III, 1 April 2020 [French] Resolute Forest Products Inc. v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2016-13, Respondent Rejoinder Memorial on Merits and Da", "field_61": "20151230 20150930 20160629 20160901 20160929 20161013 20161014 20161103 20161118 20161212 20161222 20170222 20170508 20170329 20170503 20170629 20170614 20170712 20170801 20170815 20170816 20180130 20180323 20180815 20180821 20181228 20190219 20190417 20190416 20190709 20191118 20191206 20200217 20200309 20200401 20200304 20200507 20200420 20200423 20200508 20200824 20201104", "field_62": "234 235", "field_299": "15532", "Filename": "db://FE_SelectDisputeViewForContegraSearch#RowId=995", "field_102": "6166,6173,6176,6181,7773,8060,8062", "field_103": "712,1459,1459,1570,1459,712,712", "field_104": "5408,5462,5666,6183,6184,6188,8071,8076,8151", "field_105": "900,900,900,900,900,1460,900,900,900" }, "paragraphs": null, "hitCount": 0, "highlightedFields": null }, { "fields": { "rowid": "891 5159 5160 5161 5162 5163 5164 5165 5166 5167 5168 5169 5170 5171 5172 5173 5174 5175 5176 5177 5178 5179 5180 5181 5182 5183 5184 5185 5186 5187 5188 5189 5190 5191 5192 5193 5194 5195 5196 5197 5198 5199 5200 5201 5202 5203 5204 5205 5206 5207 5208 5209 5210 5211 5212", "disputeid": "13294", "disputecitation": "S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada", "fullcitation": "S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada", "disputestartdate": "19981030", "isdisputecitation": "1", "modifiedon": "20210214", "field_respondentstates": "Canada", "field_100": "13658", "field_101": "578", "field_106": "14297", "field_108": "403", "field_109": "403", "field_110": "19981030", "field_145": "332", "field_67": "S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada", "field_69": "12324", "field_70": "11086", "field_71": "UN/0022", "field_72": "S. D. Myers v. Canada", "field_73": "S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada", "field_74": "1950", "field_77": "1951", "field_78": "112", "field_82": "1953", "field_83": "113", "contenttypedatamasterid": "18884 18885 18886 18887 18888 18889 18890 18891 18892 18893 18894 18895 18896 18897 18898 18899 18900 18901 18902 18903 18904 18905 18906 18907 18908 18909 18910 18911 18912 18913 18914 18915 18916 18917 18918 18919 18920 18921 18922 18923 18924 18925 18926 18927 18928 18929 18930 18931 18932 18933 18934 18935 18936 18937", "field_documenttypeid": "1080 1081 1078 1064 1067 1076 1075 1079", "field_137": "True", "field_56": "15196", "field_57": "UN/0022/01 UN/0022/02 UN/0022/03 UN/0022/04 UN/0022/07 UN/0022/08 UN/0022/09 UN/0022/10 UN/0022/12 UN/0022/13 UN/0022/14 UN/0022/15 UN/0022/16 UN/0022/17 UN/0022/18 UN/0022/19 UN/0022/20 UN/0022/21 UN/0022/22 UN/0022/23 UN/0022/24 UN/0022/25 UN/0022/26 UN/0022/27 UN/0022/28 UN/0022/29 UN/0022/30 UN/0022/31 UN/0022/34 UN/0022/35 UN/0022/36 UN/0022/37 UN/0022/38 UN/0022/39 UN/0022/40 UN/0022/41 UN/0022/42 UN/0022/43 UN/0022/44 UN/0022/45 UN/0022/46 UN/0022/47 UN/0022/48 UN/0022/49 UN/0022/50 UN/0022/51 UN/0022/52 UN/0022/53 UN/0022/54 UN/0022/55 UN/0022/56 UN/0022/57 UN/0022/58 UN/0022/59", "field_58": "Tribunal Amendment to Procedural Order No. 5 Procedural Order No. 16 (concerning confidentiality in materials produced in the arbitration) Separate Opinion by Dr. Bryan Schwartz Partial Award Procedural Orders Nos. 17 and 18 Procedural Order No. 19 Procedural Order No. 20 Second Partial Award (Damages) Procedural Order No. 21 Final Award Dissenting opinion on costs Review by Federal Court of Canada Procedural Order 1 Procedural Order 2 Procedural Order 3 Procedural Order 4 Procedural Order 5 Procedural Order 6 Procedural Order 7 Procedural Order 8 Procedural Order 9 Procedural Order 10 Procedural Order 11 Procedural Order 12 Procedural Order 13 Procedural Order 14 Procedural Order 15 Procedural Order 16 Procedural Order 18 Notice of Intent Notice of Arbitration Statement of Claim Statement of Defence Claimant Reply (Initial Phase) Claimant Memorial (Initial Phase) Respondent Counter-Memorial Claimant Supplemental Memorial Respondent Supplemental Memorial Respondent Memorandum on U.S. Law Claimant Reply to Supplemental Memorial Respondent Reply to Supplemental Memorial Claimant Response to Article 1128 Submission Claimant Response to Memorandum on U.S. Law Claimant Summary on Damages Respondent Application for Stay of Proceedings Claimant Memorial (Damages Phase) Respondent Counter-Memorial (Damages Phase) Respondent Rejoinder Memorial (Damages Phase) Respondent Supplementary Counter-Memorial (Damages Phase) United States Article 1128 Submission Claimant Submission on Costs Respondent Submission on Costs Claimant Response to Respondent Submission on Stay of Arbitration Claimant Reply Memorial (Damages Phase)", "field_59": "S. D. Myers v. Canada Tribunal Amendment to Procedural Order No. 5 S. D. Myers v. Canada Procedural Order No. 16 (concerning confidentiality in materials produced in the arbitration) S. D. Myers v. Canada Separate Opinion by Dr. Bryan Schwartz S. D. Myers v. Canada Partial Award S. D. Myers v. Canada Procedural Orders Nos. 17 and 18 S. D. Myers v. Canada Procedural Order No. 19 S. D. Myers v. Canada Procedural Order No. 20 S. D. Myers v. Canada Second Partial Award (Damages) S. D. Myers v. Canada Procedural Order No. 21 S. D. Myers v. Canada Final Award S. D. Myers v. Canada Dissenting opinion on costs S. D. Myers v. Canada Review by Federal Court of Canada S. D. Myers v. Canada Procedural Order 1 S. D. Myers v. Canada Procedural Order 2 S. D. Myers v. Canada Procedural Order 3 S. D. Myers v. Canada Procedural Order 4 S. D. Myers v. Canada Procedural Order 5 S. D. Myers v. Canada Procedural Order 6 S. D. Myers v. Canada Procedural Order 7 S. D. Myers v. Canada Procedural Order 8 S. D. Myers v. Canada Procedural Order 9 S. D. Myers v. Canada Procedural Order 10 S. D. Myers v. Canada Procedural Order 11 S. D. Myers v. Canada Procedural Order 12 S. D. Myers v. Canada Procedural Order 13 S. D. Myers v. Canada Procedural Order 14 S. D. Myers v. Canada Procedural Order 15 S. D. Myers v. Canada Procedural Order 16 S. D. Myers v. Canada Procedural Order 18 S. D. Myers v. Canada Notice of Intent S. D. Myers v. Canada Notice of Arbitration S. D. Myers v. Canada Statement of Claim S. D. Myers v. Canada Statement of Defence S. D. Myers v. Canada Claimant Reply (Initial Phase) S. D. Myers v. Canada Claimant Memorial (Initial Phase) S. D. Myers v. Canada Respondent Counter-Memorial S. D. Myers v. Canada Claimant Supplemental Memorial S. D. Myers v. Canada Respondent Supplemental Memorial S. D. Myers v. Canada Respondent Memorandum on U.S. Law S. D. Myers v. Canada Claimant Reply to Supplemental Memorial S. D. Myers v. Canada Respondent Reply to Supplemental Memorial S. D. Myers v. Canada Claimant Response to Article 1128 Submission S. D. Myers v. Canada Claimant Response to Memorandum on U.S. Law S. D. Myers v. Canada Claimant Summary on Damages S. D. Myers v. Canada Respondent Application for Stay of Proceedings S. D. Myers v. Canada Claimant Memorial (Damages Phase) S. D. Myers v. Canada Respondent Counter-Memorial (Damages Phase) S. D. Myers v. Canada Respondent Rejoinder Memorial (Damages Phase) S. D. Myers v. Canada Respondent Supplementary Counter-Memorial (Damages Phase) S. D. Myers v. Canada United States Article 1128 Submission S. D. Myers v. Canada Claimant Submission on Costs S. D. Myers v. Canada Respondent Submission on Costs S. D. Myers v. Canada Claimant Response to Respondent Submission on Stay of Arbitration S. D. Myers v. Canada Claimant Reply Memorial (Damages Phase)", "field_60": "S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Amendment to Procedural Order No. 5 (Procedural Order on Confidentiality), 2 April 2000 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Procedural Order No. 16 (Concerning Confidentiality in Materials Produced in the Arbitration), 13 May 2000 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Separate Opinion by Dr. Bryan Schwartz, Concurring Except with Respect to Performance Requirements, in the Partial Award of the Tribunal, 12 November 2000 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Partial Award, 13 November 2000 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Procedural Orders No. 17 and No. 18, 26 February 2001 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Procedural Order No. 19, 25 June 2001 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Procedural Order No. 20, 25 August 2001 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Second Partial Award, 21 October 2002 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Procedural Order No. 21, 2 December 2002 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Final Award (Concerning the Apportionment of Costs Between the Disputing Parties), 30 December 2002 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Dissenting Opinion of Professor Bryan P. Schwartz (Concerning the Apportionment of Costs Between the Disputing Parties), 30 December 2002 The Attorney General of Canada and S.D. Myers, Inc. and United Mexican States, UNCITRAL, Reasons for Order, 13 January 2004 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Procedural Order No. 1, 28 May 1999 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Procedural Order No. 2, 28 May 1999 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Procedural Order No. 3, 10 June 1999 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, (UNCITRAL), Procedural Order No. 4, 6 July 1999 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Procedural Order No. 5, 28 July 1999. S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Procedural Order No. 6, 4 September 1999 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, (UNCITRAL), Procedural Order No. 7, 4 October 1999 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Procedural Order No. 8, 31 October 1999 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Procedural Order No. 9, 4 November 1999 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Procedural Order No. 10 (Concerning Crown Privilege), 16 November 1999 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Procedural Order No. 11, 11 November 1999 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Procedural Order No. 12 (concerning written questions to be addressed to certain witnesses), 26 November 1999 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Procedural Order No. 13, 31 December 1999 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, (UNCITRAL), Procedural Order No. 14, 24 January 2000 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, (UNCITRAL), Procedural Order No. 15, 24 January 2000 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, (UNCITRAL), Tribunal Letter to Parties Regarding Oral Testimony, 31 January 2000 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Procedural Order No. 18, 26 February 2001 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Notice of Intent, 21 July 1998 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Notice of Arbitration, 30 October 1998 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Statement of Claim, 30 October 1998 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Statement of Defence, 17 June 1999 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Claimant Reply (Initial Phase), 20 July 1999 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Claimant Memorial (Initial Phase), 20 July 1999 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Respondent Counter-Memorial, 5 October 1999 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Claimant Supplemental Memorial, 15 December 1999 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Respondent Supplemental Memorial, 15 December 1999 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Respondent Memorandum on U.S. Law, 14 January 2000 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Claimant Reply to Supplemental Memorial, 24 January 2000 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Respondent Reply to Supplemental Memorial, 24 January 2000 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Claimant Response to Article 1128 Submission, 28 January 2000 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Claimant Response to Memorandum on U.S. Law, 7 February 2000 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Claimant Summary on Damages, 16 January 2001 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Respondent Application for Stay of Proceedings, 15 February 2001 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Claimant Memorial (Damages Phase), 1 March 2001 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Respondent Counter-Memorial (Damages Phase), 7 June 2001 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Respondent Rejoinder Memorial (Damages Phase), 31 August 2001 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, United States Article 1128 Submission, 18 September 2001 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Claimant Submission on Costs, 4 November 2002 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Respondent Submission on Costs, 4 November 2002 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Claimant Response to Respondent Submission on Stay of Arbitration, 19 February 2001 S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Claimant Reply Memorial (Damages Phase), 9 August 2001", "field_61": "20000402 20000513 20001112 20001113 20010226 20010625 20010825 20021021 20021202 20021230 20040113 19980721 19981030 19990617 19990720 19991005 19991215 20000114 20000124 20000128 20000207 20010116 20010215 20010301 20010607 20010831 20010918 20021104 20010219 20010809", "field_62": "234", "field_299": "15536", "Filename": "db://FE_SelectDisputeViewForContegraSearch#RowId=891", "field_102": "2413,8045,8108,8111", "field_103": "652,1755,1755,1755", "field_104": "8071,8115,8116,8119,8124", "field_105": "900,900,1755,1755,1755", "field_150": "20814,20822 20813,20822 20822 20821,20822 20820,20822 20813,20814,20818,20820,20821" }, "paragraphs": null, "hitCount": 0, "highlightedFields": null }, { "fields": { "rowid": "934 6007 6008 6009 6010 6011 6012 6013 6014 6015", "disputeid": "13337", "disputecitation": "St. Marys VCNA, LLC v. Government of Canada (PCA Case No. 2012-19)", "fullcitation": "St. Marys VCNA, LLC v. Government of Canada (PCA Case No. 2012-19)", "isdisputecitation": "1", "field_respondentstates": "Canada", "field_109": "403", "field_67": "St. Marys VCNA, LLC v. Government of Canada", "field_68": "PCA Case No. 2012-19", "field_69": "12324", "field_70": "11086", "field_71": "UN/0065", "field_72": "St. Marys v. Canada", "field_73": "St. Marys VCNA, LLC v. Government of Canada (PCA Case No. 2012-19)", "contenttypedatamasterid": "19762 19763 19764 19765 19766 19767 19768 19769 19770", "field_documenttypeid": "1076 1067 1075 1079 1080 1074 1077", "field_137": "True", "field_56": "15239", "field_57": "UN/0065/01 UN/0065/02 UN/0065/03 UN/0065/04 UN/0065/05 UN/0065/06 UN/0065/07 UN/0065/08 UN/0065/09", "field_58": "Notice of Intent Second Notice of Intent Notice of Application to Federal Court Notice of Arbitration Respondent Brief Outline of Jurisdictional and Substantive Defences Procedural Order No. 1 Confidentiality Oder Consent Award Report on Inadvertent Disclosure of Privileged Documents", "field_59": "St. Marys v. Canada Notice of Intent St. Marys v. Canada Second Notice of Intent St. Marys v. Canada Notice of Application to Federal Court St. Marys v. Canada Notice of Arbitration St. Marys v. Canada Respondent Brief Outline of Jurisdictional and Substantive Defences St. Marys v. Canada Procedural Order No. 1 St. Marys v. Canada Confidentiality Oder St. Marys v. Canada Consent Award St. Marys v. Canada Report on Inadvertent Disclosure of Privileged Documents", "field_60": "St. Marys VCNA, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-19, Notice of Intent, 13 May 2011 St. Marys VCNA, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-19, Second Notice of Intent, 23 March 2012 St. Marys VCNA, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-19, Notice of Application to Federal Court, 30 March 2012 St. Marys VCNA, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-19, Notice of Arbitration, 14 September 2011 St. Marys VCNA, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-19, Respondent Brief Outline of Jurisdictional and Substantive Defences, 31 August 2012 St. Marys VCNA, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-19, Procedural Order No. 1, 10 September 2012 St. Marys VCNA, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-19, Confidentiality Order, 24 October 2012 St. Marys VCNA, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-19, Consent Award, 29 March 2013 St. Marys VCNA, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2012-19, Report on Inadvertent Disclosure of Privileged Documents, 27 December 2012", "field_61": "20110513 20120323 20120330 20110914 20120831 20120910 20121024 20130329 20121227", "field_62": "234", "field_299": "15536", "Filename": "db://FE_SelectDisputeViewForContegraSearch#RowId=934" }, "paragraphs": null, "hitCount": 0, "highlightedFields": null }, { "fields": { "rowid": "1062 7458 7459 7460 7461 7462 7463 7464 7465 7466 7467 7468 7469 7470 7471 7472 7473 7474 7475 7476 7477 7478 7479 7480 7481 7482 7483 7484 7485 7486 7487 7488 7489 7490 7491 7492 7493 7494 7495 7496 7497 7498 7499 7500 7501 7502 7503 7504 7716 8110 8111 8112 8113 8114 8115 8116 8117 8118 8119 8120 8121 8122 8123 8124 8125 8126 8127 8128 8129 8130 8131 8132 8133 8134 8135 8136 8137 8138 8139 8140 8141 8142 8143 8144 8145 8146 8147 8148 8149 8150 8151 8152 8153 8154 8155 8156 8157 8158 8159 8160 8161 8162 8163 8164 8165 8219", "disputeid": "13466", "disputecitation": "Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada (PCA Case No. 2018-54)", "fullcitation": "Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada (PCA Case No. 2018-54)", "isdisputecitation": "1", "modifiedon": "20210222", "field_respondentstates": "Canada", "field_100": "13878", "field_101": "578", "field_106": "14289", "field_108": "578", "field_109": "403", "field_145": "333", "field_67": "Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada", "field_68": "PCA Case No. 2018-54", "field_69": "12324", "field_70": "11086", "field_71": "UN/0195", "field_72": "Tennant Energy v. Canada", "field_73": "Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada (PCA Case No. 2018-54)", "field_74": "2204", "field_77": "2290", "field_78": "112", "field_82": "2150", "field_83": "113", "contenttypedatamasterid": "21224 21225 21226 21227 21228 21229 21230 21231 21232 21233 21234 21235 21236 21237 21238 21239 21240 21241 21242 21243 21244 21245 21246 21247 21248 21249 21250 21251 21252 21253 21254 21255 21256 21257 21258 21259 21260 21261 21262 21263 21264 21265 21266 21267 21268 21269 21270 21554 23395 23396 23397 23398 23399 23400 23401 23402 23403 23404 23405 23406 23407 23408 23409 23410 23411 23412 23413 23414 23415 23416 23417 23418 23419 23420 23421 23422 23423 23424 23425 23426 23427 23428 23429 23430 23431 23432 23433 23434 23435 23436 23437 23438 23439 23440 23441 23442 23443 23444 23445 23446 23447 23448 23449 23450 23928", "field_documenttypeid": "1075 1079 1077 1080", "field_137": "True true", "field_56": "15368", "field_57": "UN/0195/01 UN/0195/02 UN/0195/03 UN/0195/04 UN/0195/05 UN/0195/06 UN/0195/07 UN/0195/08 UN/0195/09 UN/0195/10 UN/0195/11 UN/0195/12 UN/0195/13 UN/0195/14 UN/0195/15 UN/0195/16 UN/0195/17 UN/0195/18 UN/0195/19 UN/0195/20 UN/0195/21 UN/0195/22 UN/0195/23 UN/0195/24 UN/0195/25 UN/0195/26 UN/0195/27 UN/0195/28 UN/0195/29 UN/0195/30 UN/0195/31 UN/0195/32 UN/0195/33 UN/0195/34 UN/0195/35 UN/0195/36 UN/0195/37 UN/0195/38 UN/0195/39 UN/0195/40 UN/0195/41 UN/0195/42 UN/0195/43 UN/0195/44 UN/0195/45 UN/0195/46 UN/0195/47 UN/0195/48 UN/0195/100 UN/0195/101 UN/0195/102 UN/0195/103 UN/0195/104 UN/0195/49 UN/0195/50 UN/0195/51 UN/0195/52 UN/0195/53 UN/0195/54 UN/0195/55 UN/0195/56 UN/0195/57 UN/0195/58 UN/0195/59 UN/0195/60 UN/0195/61 UN/0195/62 UN/0195/63 UN/0195/64 UN/0195/65 UN/0195/66 UN/0195/67 UN/0195/68 UN/0195/69 UN/0195/70 UN/0195/71 UN/0195/72 UN/0195/73 UN/0195/74 UN/0195/75 UN/0195/76 UN/0195/77 UN/0195/78 UN/0195/79 UN/0195/80 UN/0195/81 UN/0195/82 UN/0195/83 UN/0195/84 UN/0195/85 UN/0195/86 UN/0195/87 UN/0195/88 UN/0195/89 UN/0195/90 UN/0195/91 UN/0195/92 UN/0195/93 UN/0195/94 UN/0195/95 UN/0195/96 UN/0195/97 UN/0195/98 UN/0195/99 UN/0195/105", "field_58": "Notice of Arbitration [Redacted] Respondent Statement of Defence Respondent Response to the Claimant Submission on EU GDPR I Questions and Claimant Response to the Tribunal GDPR Questions and Data Privacy Questions Respondent Response to the Claimant Submission on EU GDPR II Claimant Submission on Confidentiality Respondent Submission on Place of Arbitration and Transparency Respondent Letter to the Tribunal re Confidentiality Order Claimant Submission on Place of Arbitration Claimant E-mail to the Tribunal re Application of the EU GDPR Tribunal Communication to the Parties Procedural Order No. 1 Confidentiality Order Procedural Order No. 2 Claimant Letter to the Tribunal re Non-Disputing Party Submissions I Respondent Letter to the Tribunal re Non-Disputing Party Submissions Claimant Letter to the Tribunal re Non-Disputing Party Submissions II Claimant Request for Interim Measures Respondent Motion for Security for Costs and Disclosure of Third-Party Funding Response to Respondent Motion for Security for Costs and Disclosure of Funding Respondent Request for Bifurcation Claimant Response to Respondent Motion for Bifurcation Tribunal Communication to the Parties re Non-Disputing Party Submissions First Procedural Hearing Transcript PCA Press Release Mexico Article 1128 Submission United States Article 1128 Submission Respondent Response to Claimant Request for Interim Measures [Redacted] Claimant Letter re Respondent Confidentiality Designations Respondent Letter to the Tribunal Respondent Response to Article 1128 Submissions Claimant Response to Article 1128 Submissions Respondent Letter re Confidentiality Designations Claimant E-mail re Respondent Confidentiality Designations Tribunal Communication to the Parties re Respondent Confidentiality Designations Procedural Order No. 4 Procedural Order No. 3 [Redacted] Claimant Comments on Section 19 of the FIPPA [Redacted] Claimant Objections to Respondent Confidentiality Designations [Redacted] Respondent Letter to the Tribunal re its Confidentiality Designations [Redacted] Respondent Comments on Section 19 of the FIPPA [Redacted] Transcript of Hearing on Bifurcation and Preliminary Motions - Day One [Redacted] Transcript of Hearing on Bifurcation and Preliminary Motions - Day Two [Redacted] Respondent Motion for Targeted Document Production [Redacted] Appendix A: Redfern Schedule for Document Requests [Redacted] Procedural Order No. 5 Procedural Order No. 5 - Annex 1 [Redacted] Procedural Order No. 6 Tribunal E-mail to Parties re Publication of Documents on the PCA Website II Tribunal E-mail to Parties re Respondent Request for Claimant Production of Valuation Data Tribunal E-mail to Parties re Modification of Confidentiality Designation Deadlines Tribunal Letter to Parties re Respondent Request for Claimant Production of Valuation Data Tribunal E-mail to Parties re Parties Experts Consultations Respondent E-mail re Public Access to the January 2020 Hearing Video I Respondent E-mail re Corrections to the January Hearing Transcript Claimant E-mail re Public Access to the January 2020 Hearing Video I Respondent Letter re Decision in Dirk Herzig v. Turkmenistan Claimant E-mail re Decision in Dirk Herzig v. Turkmenistan Respondent E-mail re Decision in Dirk Herzig v. Turkmenistan Respondent Submission on Legal Authority re Motion for Security for Costs and Disclosure of Third-Party Funding Response to Respondent Submission on Herzig v. Turkmenistan Claimant Response to Respondent Motion for Targeted Document Production Claimant Motion to Modify Procedural Schedule Respondent E-mail re Claimant Motion to Modify Procedural Schedule Tribunal E-mail re Public Access to the January 2020 Hearing Video I Tribunal E-mail re Decision in Dirk Herzig v. Turkmenistan Tribunal E-mail re Corrections to the January Hearing Transcript I Tribunal E-mail re Corrections to the January Hearing Transcript II Tribunal E-mail re Public Access to the January 2020 Hearing Video II Tribunal E-mail re Respondent Motion for Targeted Document Production Tribunal E-mail to the Parties Tribunal E-mail re Respondent Confidentiality Designations Claimant E-mail re Public Access to the January 2020 Hearing Video II (Redacted) Respondent E-mail re Public Access to the January 2020 Hearing Video II (Redacted) Respondent E-mail to the Tribunal re Assertions of Confidentiality [Redacted] Claimant Letter to the Tribunal re Assertions of Confidentiality [Redacted] Claimant E-mail to the Tribunal re Assertions of Confidentiality I [Redacted] Claimant E-mail to the Tribunal re Assertions of Confidentiality II [Redacted] Tribunal E-mail re Assertions of Confidentiality [Redacted] Procedural Order No. 7 Claimant E-mail to the Tribunal re Modification to the Procedural Schedule Respondent E-mail to the Tribunal re Modification to the Procedural Schedule Respondent E-mail to the Tribunal re Publication of Documents on the PCA Website Expert Report of Deloitte LLP Respondent Submission re Use of Information in Mesa Power Arbitration Claimant Response re Use of Information in Mesa Power Arbitration Witness Statement of Parthenya Taiyanides Respondent Request re Production of Valuation Data I Respondent Request re Use of Information in Mesa Power Arbitration Claimant Response re Respondent Request for Production of Valuation Data Claimant Rejoinder re Use of Information in Mesa Power Arbitration Respondent Request re Production of Valuation Data II Claimant Response to Respondent Motion on Valuation Data Respondent E-mail to the Tribunal re Modification of Confidentiality Designation Deadlines Claimant E-mail to the Tribunal re Modification of Confidentiality Designation Deadlines Respondent Second E-mail to the Tribunal re Modification of Confidentiality Designation Deadlines Claimant E-mail to the Tribunal re Parties Experts Consultations I Respondent E-mail to the Tribunal re Parties Experts Consultations Respondent Memorial on Jurisdiction Respondent Renewed Request for Bifurcation Witness Statement of Lucas McCall Claimant E-mail to the Tribunal re Parties Experts Consultations II Tribunal E-mail to Parties re Publication of Documents on the PCA Website I Tribunal E-mail to Parties re Modification to the Procedural Schedule Procedural Order No. 8 [Redacted]", "field_59": "Tennant Energy v. Canada Notice of Arbitration [Redacted] Tennant Energy v. Canada Respondent Statement of Defence Tennant Energy v. Canada Respondent Response to the Claimant Submission on EU GDPR I Tennant Energy v. Canada Questions and Claimant Response to the Tribunal GDPR Questions and Data Privacy Questions Tennant Energy v. Canada Respondent Response to the Claimant Submission on EU GDPR II Tennant Energy v. Canada Claimant Submission on Confidentiality Tennant Energy v. Canada Respondent Submission on Place of Arbitration and Transparency Tennant Energy v. Canada Respondent Letter to the Tribunal re Confidentiality Order Tennant Energy v. Canada Claimant Submission on Place of Arbitration Tennant Energy v. Canada Claimant E-mail to the Tribunal re Application of the EU GDPR Tennant Energy v. Canada Tribunal Communication to the Parties Tennant Energy v. Canada Procedural Order No. 1 Tennant Energy v. Canada Confidentiality Order Tennant Energy v. Canada Procedural Order No. 2 Tennant Energy v. Canada Claimant Letter to the Tribunal re Non-Disputing Party Submissions I Tennant Energy v. Canada Respondent Letter to the Tribunal re Non-Disputing Party Submissions Tennant Energy v. Canada Claimant Letter to the Tribunal re Non-Disputing Party Submissions II Tennant Energy v. Canada Claimant Request for Interim Measures Tennant Energy v. Canada Respondent Motion for Security for Costs and Disclosure of Third-Party Funding Tennant Energy v. Canada Response to Respondent Motion for Security for Costs and Disclosure of Funding Tennant Energy v. Canada Respondent Request for Bifurcation Tennant Energy v. Canada Claimant Response to Respondent Motion for Bifurcation Tennant Energy v. Canada Tribunal Communication to the Parties re Non-Disputing Party Submissions Tennant Energy v. Canada First Procedural Hearing Transcript Tennant Energy v. Canada PCA Press Release Tennant Energy v. Canada Mexico Article 1128 Submission Tennant Energy v. Canada United States Article 1128 Submission Tennant Energy v. Canada Respondent Response to Claimant Request for Interim Measures [Redacted] Tennant Energy v. Canada Claimant Letter re Respondent Confidentiality Designations Tennant Energy v. Canada Respondent Letter to the Tribunal Tennant Energy v. Canada Respondent Response to Article 1128 Submissions Tennant Energy v. Canada Claimant Response to Article 1128 Submissions Tennant Energy v. Canada Respondent Letter re Confidentiality Designations Tennant Energy v. Canada Claimant E-mail re Respondent Confidentiality Designations Tennant Energy v. Canada Tribunal Communication to the Parties re Respondent Confidentiality Designations Tennant Energy v. Canada Procedural Order No. 4 Tennant Energy v. Canada Procedural Order No. 3 [Redacted] Tennant Energy v. Canada Claimant Comments on Section 19 of the FIPPA [Redacted] Tennant Energy v. Canada Claimant Objections to Respondent Confidentiality Designations [Redacted] Tennant Energy v. Canada Respondent Letter to the Tribunal re its Confidentiality Designations [Redacted] Tennant Energy v. Canada Respondent Comments on Section 19 of the FIPPA [Redacted] Tennant Energy v. Canada Transcript of Hearing on Bifurcation and Preliminary Motions - Day One [Redacted] Tennant Energy v. Canada Transcript of Hearing on Bifurcation and Preliminary Motions - Day Two [Redacted] Tennant Energy v. Canada Respondent Motion for Targeted Document Production [Redacted] Tennant Energy v. Canada Appendix A: Redfern Schedule for Document Requests [Redacted] Tennant Energy v. Canada Procedural Order No. 5 Tennant Energy v. Canada Procedural Order No. 5 - Annex 1 [Redacted] Tennant Energy v. Canada Procedural Order No. 6 Tennant Energy v. Canada Tribunal E-mail to Parties re Publication of Documents on the PCA Website II Tennant Energy v. Canada Tribunal E-mail to Parties re Respondent Request for Claimant Production of Valuation Data Tennant Energy v. Canada Tribunal E-mail to Parties re Modification of Confidentiality Designation Deadlines Tennant Energy v. Canada Tribunal Letter to Parties re Respondent Request for Claimant Production of Valuation Data Tennant Energy v. Canada Tribunal E-mail to Parties re Parties Experts Consultations Tennant Energy v. Canada Respondent E-mail re Public Access to the January 2020 Hearing Video I Tennant Energy v. Canada Respondent E-mail re Corrections to the January Hearing Transcript Tennant Energy v. Canada Claimant E-mail re Public Access to the January 2020 Hearing Video I Tennant Energy v. Canada Respondent Letter re Decision in Dirk Herzig v. Turkmenistan Tennant Energy v. Canada Claimant E-mail re Decision in Dirk Herzig v. Turkmenistan Tennant Energy v. Canada Respondent E-mail re Decision in Dirk Herzig v. Turkmenistan Tennant Energy v. Canada Respondent Submission on Legal Authority re Motion for Security for Costs and Disclosure of Third-Party Funding Tennant Energy v. Canada Response to Respondent Submission on Herzig v. Turkmenistan Tennant Energy v. Canada Claimant Response to Respondent Motion for Targeted Document Production Tennant Energy v. Canada Claimant Motion to Modify Procedural Schedule Tennant Energy v. Canada Respondent E-mail re Claimant Motion to Modify Procedural Schedule Tennant Energy v. Canada Tribunal E-mail re Public Access to the January 2020 Hearing Video I Tennant Energy v. Canada Tribunal E-mail re Decision in Dirk Herzig v. Turkmenistan Tennant Energy v. Canada Tribunal E-mail re Corrections to the January Hearing Transcript I Tennant Energy v. Canada Tribunal E-mail re Corrections to the January Hearing Transcript II Tennant Energy v. Canada Tribunal E-mail re Public Access to the January 2020 Hearing Video II Tennant Energy v. Canada Tribunal E-mail re Respondent Motion for Targeted Document Production Tennant Energy v. Canada Tribunal E-mail to the Parties Tennant Energy v. Canada Tribunal E-mail re Respondent Confidentiality Designations Tennant Energy v. Canada Claimant E-mail re Public Access to the January 2020 Hearing Video II (Redacted) Tennant Energy v. Canada Respondent E-mail re Public Access to the January 2020 Hearing Video II (Redacted) Tennant Energy v. Canada Respondent E-mail to the Tribunal re Assertions of Confidentiality [Redacted] Tennant Energy v. Canada Claimant Letter to the Tribunal re Assertions of Confidentiality [Redacted] Tennant Energy v. Canada Claimant E-mail to the Tribunal re Assertions of Confidentiality I [Redacted] Tennant Energy v. Canada Claimant E-mail to the Tribunal re Assertions of Confidentiality II [Redacted] Tennant Energy v. Canada Tribunal E-mail re Assertions of Confidentiality [Redacted] Tennant Energy v. Canada Procedural Order No. 7 Tennant Energy v. Canada Claimant E-mail to the Tribunal re Modification to the Procedural Schedule Tennant Energy v. Canada Respondent E-mail to the Tribunal re Modification to the Procedural Schedule Tennant Energy v. Canada Respondent E-mail to the Tribunal re Publication of Documents on the PCA Website Tennant Energy v. Canada Expert Report of Deloitte LLP Tennant Energy v. Canada Respondent Submission re Use of Information in Mesa Power Arbitration Tennant Energy v. Canada Claimant Response re Use of Information in Mesa Power Arbitration Tennant Energy v. Canada Witness Statement of Parthenya Taiyanides Tennant Energy v. Canada Respondent Request re Production of Valuation Data I Tennant Energy v. Canada Respondent Request re Use of Information in Mesa Power Arbitration Tennant Energy v. Canada Claimant Response re Respondent Request for Production of Valuation Data Tennant Energy v. Canada Claimant Rejoinder re Use of Information in Mesa Power Arbitration Tennant Energy v. Canada Respondent Request re Production of Valuation Data II Tennant Energy v. Canada Claimant Response to Respondent Motion on Valuation Data Tennant Energy v. Canada Respondent E-mail to the Tribunal re Modification of Confidentiality Designation Deadlines Tennant Energy v. Canada Claimant E-mail to the Tribunal re Modification of Confidentiality Designation Deadlines Tennant Energy v. Canada Respondent Second E-mail to the Tribunal re Modification of Confidentiality Designation Deadlines Tennant Ene", "field_60": "Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Notice of Arbitration, 1 June 2017 [Redacted] Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Respondent Statement of Defence, 2 July 2019 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Respondent Response to the Claimant Submission on EU GDPR I, 11 June 2019 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Questions and Claimant Response to the Tribunal GDPR Questions and Data Privacy Questions, 4 June 2019 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Respondent Response to the Claimant Submission on EU GDPR II, 30 April 2019 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Claimant Submission on Confidentiality, 23 April 2019 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Respondent Submission on Place of Arbitration and Transparency, 23 April 2019 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Respondent Letter to the Tribunal re Confidentiality Order, 23 April 2019 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Claimant Submission on Place of Arbitration, 23 April 2019 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Claimant E-mail to the Tribunal re Application of the EU GDPR, 17 April 2019 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Tribunal Communication to the Parties, 24 June 2019 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Procedural Order No. 1, 24 June 2019 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Confidentiality Order, 24 June 2019 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Procedural Order No. 2, 29 July 2019 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Claimant Letter to the Tribunal re Non-Disputing Party Submissions I, 2 November 2019 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Respondent Letter to the Tribunal re Non-Disputing Party Submissions, 4 November 2019 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Claimant Letter to the Tribunal re Non-Disputing Party Submissions II, 5 November 2019 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Claimant Request for Interim Measures, 16 August 2019 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Respondent Motion for Security for Costs and Disclosure of Third-Party Funding, 16 August 2019 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Response to Respondent Motion for Security for Costs and Disclosure of Funding, 23 September 2019 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Respondent Request for Bifurcation, 23 September 2019 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Claimant Response to Respondent Motion for Bifurcation, 23 October 2019 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Tribunal Communication to the Parties re Non-Disputing Party Submissions, 11 November 2019 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, First Procedural Hearing Transcript, 17 June 2019 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, PCA Press Release, 7 January 2020 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Mexico Article 1128 Submission, 27 November 2019 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, United States Article 1128 Submission, 27 November 2019 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Respondent Response to Claimant Request for Interim Measures, 23 September 2019 [Redacted] Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Claimant Letter re Respondent Confidentiality Designations, 14 November 2019 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Respondent Letter to the Tribunal, 3 December 2019 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Respondent Response to Article 1128 Submissions, 27 December 2019 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Claimant Response to Article 1128 Submissions, 27 December 2019 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Respondent Letter re Confidentiality Designations, 14 November 2019 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Claimant E-mail re Respondent Confidentiality Designations, 3 December 2019 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Tribunal Communication to the Parties re Respondent Confidentiality Designations, 15 November 2019 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Procedural Order No. 4, 27 February 2020 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Procedural Order No. 3, 10 January 2020 [Redacted] Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Claimant Comments on Section 19 of the FIPPA, 12 December 2019 [Redacted] Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Claimant Objections to Respondent Confidentiality Designations, 29 October 2019 [Redacted] Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Respondent Letter to the Tribunal re its Confidentiality Designations, 12 November 2019 [Redacted] Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Respondent Comments on Section 19 of the FIPPA, 19 December 2019 [Redacted] Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Transcript of Hearing on Bifurcation and Preliminary Motions - Day One, 14 January 2020 [Redacted] Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Transcript of Hearing on Bifurcation and Preliminary Motions - Day Two, 15 January 2020 [Redacted] Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Respondent Motion for Targeted Document Production, 3 April 2020 [Redacted] Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Appendix A: Redfern Schedule for Document Requests, 3 April 2020 [Redacted] Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Procedural Order No. 5, 27 March 2020 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Procedural Order No. 5 - Annex 1, 27 March 2020 [Redacted] Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Procedural Order No. 6, 6 May 2020 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Tribunal E-mail to Parties re Publication of Documents on the PCA Website II, 17 July 2020 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Tribunal E-mail to Parties re Respondent Request for Claimant Production of Valuation Data, 30 August 2020 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Tribunal E-mail to Parties re Modification of Confidentiality Designation Deadlines, 15 September 2020 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Tribunal Letter to Parties re Respondent Request for Claimant Production of Valuation Data, 15 September 2020 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Tribunal E-mail to Parties re Parties Experts Consultations, 22 September 2020 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Respondent E-mail re Public Access to the January 2020 Hearing Video I, 20 January 2020 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Respondent E-mail re Corrections to the January Hearing Transcript, 27 March 2020 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Claimant E-mail re Public Access to the January 2020 Hearing Video I, 23 January 2020 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Respondent Letter re Decision in Dirk Herzig v. Turkmenistan, 4 February 2020 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Claimant E-mail re Decision in Dirk Herzig v. Turkmenistan, 4 February 2020 Tennant Energy, LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2018-54, Respondent E-mail re Decision in Dirk Herzig v. Turkmenistan, 5 February ", "field_61": "20170601 20190702 20190611 20190604 20190430 20190423 20190417 20190624 20190729 20191102 20191104 20191105 20190816 20190923 20191023 20191111 20190617 20200107 20191127 20191114 20191203 20191227 20191115 20200227 20200110 20191212 20191029 20191112 20191219 20200114 20200115 20200403 20200327 20200506 20200717 20200830 20200915 20200922 20200120 20200123 20200204 20200205 20200217 20200224 20200420 20200502 20200508 20200203 20200210 20200228 20200328 20200127 20200406 20200510 20191205 20200131 20200302 20200303 20200306 20200304 20200921 20200627 20200703 20200709 20200807 20200810 20200818 20200824 20200826 20200828 20200902 20200904 20200911 20200914 20200924 20200701 20200704 20201112", "field_62": "234", "field_299": "15532", "field_63": "false", "Filename": "db://FE_SelectDisputeViewForContegraSearch#RowId=1062", "field_102": "2413,4094,6502,7404", "field_103": "652,1564,1564,1564", "field_104": "2497,4460,4475,7440,7462,7488,7508,7533", "field_105": "900,900,900,900,900,900,900,900" }, "paragraphs": null, "hitCount": 0, "highlightedFields": null }, { "fields": { "rowid": "1214 7634 7635 7735", "disputeid": "13622", "disputecitation": "Theodore David Einarsson, Harold Paul Einarsson and Russell John Einarsson on their own behalf and on behalf of Geophysical Service Inc. v. Government of Canada", "fullcitation": "Theodore David Einarsson, Harold Paul Einarsson and Russell John Einarsson on their own behalf and on behalf of Geophysical Service Inc. v. Government of Canada", "isdisputecitation": "1", "field_respondentstates": "Canada", "field_109": "403", "field_67": "Theodore David Einarsson, Harold Paul Einarsson and Russell John Einarsson on their own behalf and on behalf of Geophysical Service Inc. v. Government of Canada", "field_69": "12324", "field_70": "11086", "field_71": "UN/0352", "field_72": "Einarsson v. Canada", "field_73": "Theodore David Einarsson, Harold Paul Einarsson and Russell John Einarsson on their own behalf and on behalf of Geophysical Service Inc. v. Government of Canada", "field_74": "24236", "field_77": "24296", "field_78": "112", "field_82": "7891", "field_83": "113", "contenttypedatamasterid": "21405 21406 21581", "field_documenttypeid": "1075 1076 1067", "field_137": "True", "field_56": "15524", "field_57": "UN/0352/01 UN/0352/02 UN/0352/03", "field_58": "Notice of Arbitration Notice of Intent Judgment of Federal Court of Canada", "field_59": "Einarsson v. Canada Notice of Arbitration Einarsson v. Canada Notice of Intent Einarsson v. Canada Judgment of Federal Court of Canada", "field_60": "Theodore David Einarsson, Harold Paul Einarsson and Russell John Einarsson on their own behalf and on behalf of Geophysical Service Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Notice of Arbitration, 18 April 2019 Theodore David Einarsson, Harold Paul Einarsson and Russell John Einarsson on their own behalf and on behalf of Geophysical Service Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Notice of Intent, 10 October 2018 Theodore David Einarsson, Harold Paul Einarsson and Russell John Einarsson on their own behalf and on behalf of Geophysical Service Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Judgment of Federal Court of Canada, 20 October 2020", "field_61": "20190418 20181010 20201020", "field_62": "234", "field_299": "15536", "field_63": "false", "Filename": "db://FE_SelectDisputeViewForContegraSearch#RowId=1214", "field_102": "24695,24842", "field_103": "746,746", "field_104": "24817,24919,8076", "field_105": "889,889,900" }, "paragraphs": null, "hitCount": 0, "highlightedFields": null }, { "fields": { "rowid": "896 5222 5223 5224 5225 5226 5227 5228 5229 5230 5231 5232 5233 5234 5235 5236 5237 5238 5239 5240 5241 5242 5243 5244 5245 5246 5247 5248 5249 5250 5251 5252 5253 5254 5255 5256 5257 5258 5259 5260 5261 5262 5263 5264 5265 5266 5267 5268 5269 5270 5271 5272 5273 5274 5275 5276 5277 5278 5279 5280 5281 5282 5283 5284 5285 5286 5287 5288 5289 5290 5291 5292 5293 5294 5295 5296 5297 5298 5299 5300 5301 5302 5303 5304 5305 5306 5307 5308 5309 5310 5311 7978 7979", "disputeid": "13299", "disputecitation": "United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada (ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1)", "fullcitation": "United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada (ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1)", "disputestartdate": "19990419", "isdisputecitation": "1", "modifiedon": "20210216", "field_respondentstates": "Canada", "field_100": "13664", "field_101": "578", "field_106": "14289", "field_108": "578", "field_109": "403", "field_110": "19990419", "field_145": "332", "field_67": "United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada", "field_68": "ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1", "field_69": "12324", "field_70": "11086", "field_71": "UN/0027", "field_72": "UPS v. Canada", "field_73": "United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada (ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1)", "field_74": "1966", "field_77": "1965", "field_78": "112", "field_82": "1859", "field_83": "113", "contenttypedatamasterid": "18947 18948 18949 18950 18951 18952 18953 18954 18955 18956 18957 18958 18959 18960 18961 18962 18963 18964 18965 18966 18967 18968 18969 18970 18971 18972 18973 18974 18975 18976 18977 18978 18979 18980 18981 18982 18983 18984 18985 18986 18987 18988 18989 18990 18991 18992 18993 18994 18995 18996 18997 18998 18999 19000 19001 19002 19003 19004 19005 19006 19007 19008 19009 19010 19011 19012 19013 19014 19015 19016 19017 19018 19019 19020 19021 19024 19025 19026 19027 19028 19029 19030 19031 19032 19033 19034 19035 19036 19037 19038 23263 23264", "field_documenttypeid": "1071 1074 1081 1063 1080 1072 1076 1075 1079 1077", "field_137": "True", "field_56": "15201", "field_57": "UN/0027/01 UN/0027/02 UN/0027/03 UN/0027/04 UN/0027/05 UN/0027/06 UN/0027/07 UN/0027/09 UN/0027/10 UN/0027/11 UN/0027/12 UN/0027/13 UN/0027/14 UN/0027/15 UN/0027/16 UN/0027/17 UN/0027/18 UN/0027/19 UN/0027/20 UN/0027/21 UN/0027/22 UN/0027/23 UN/0027/24 UN/0027/25 UN/0027/26 UN/0027/27 UN/0027/28 UN/0027/29 UN/0027/30 UN/0027/31 UN/0027/32 UN/0027/33 UN/0027/34 UN/0027/35 UN/0027/36 UN/0027/37 UN/0027/38 UN/0027/39 UN/0027/40 UN/0027/41 UN/0027/42 UN/0027/43 UN/0027/44 UN/0027/45 UN/0027/46 UN/0027/47 UN/0027/48 UN/0027/49 UN/0027/50 UN/0027/51 UN/0027/52 UN/0027/53 UN/0027/54 UN/0027/55 UN/0027/56 UN/0027/57 UN/0027/58 UN/0027/59 UN/0027/60 UN/0027/61 UN/0027/62 UN/0027/63 UN/0027/64 UN/0027/65 UN/0027/66 UN/0027/67 UN/0027/68 UN/0027/69 UN/0027/70 UN/0027/71 UN/0027/72 UN/0027/73 UN/0027/74 UN/0027/75 UN/0027/76 UN/0027/78 UN/0027/79 UN/0027/80 UN/0027/81 UN/0027/82 UN/0027/83 UN/0027/84 UN/0027/85 UN/0027/86 UN/0027/87 UN/0027/88 UN/0027/89 UN/0027/90 UN/0027/91 UN/0027/92 UN/0027/93 UN/0027/94", "field_58": "Award on Jurisdiction Award on the Merits Dissenting Opinion of Dean Ronald A. Cass Decision on Amicus Curiae Decision on Claim of Cabinet Decision on Document Production ami Interrogatories Decision on Filing of statement of Defense Decision on Place of Arbitration Direction of the Tribunal Concerning Document Production Direction of the Tribunal on Participation of Amicus Curiae Procedural Order 1 Procedural Order 2 Procedural Directions Procedural Directions and Order of the Tribunal Procedural Directions for Amicus Submissions Tribunal Ruling Notice of Intent Notice of Arbitration Statement of Claim Canadian Union of Postal Worker and Council of Canadian Petition to Tribunal Respondent Submission on Place of Arbitration Claimant Submission on Place of Arbitration Respondent Submission on Statement of Defence Claimant Submission on Statement of Defence Respondent Reply on Place of Arbitration Respondent Reply on Claimant Submission on Statement of Defence Claimant Reply on Respondent Submission on Statement of Defence Canadian Union of Postal Worker and Council of Canadian Petition to Tribunal Respondent Submission on Non-Party Petition Claimant Submission on Non-Party Petition Mexico First Article 1128 Submission United States First Article 1128 Submission Respondent Response on Article 1128 Submissions Canadian Union of Postal Worker and Council of Canadian Response to Respondent Submission on Petition Canadian Union of Postal Worker and Council of Canadian Response to Claimant and Mexico Submissions on Petition Claimant Amended Statement of Claim Respondent Motion on Objection to Amended Statement of Claim Respondent Memorial on Jurisdiction Claimant Counter-Memorial on Jurisdiction Respondent Reply on Jurisdiction Claimant Rejoinder on Jurisdiction United States Second Article 1128 Submission Respondent Reply on Article 1128 Submissions Claimant Reply on Article 1128 Submissions Mexico Third Article 1128 Submission United States Third Article 1128 Submission Claimant Revised Amended Statement of Claim Respondent Submission on Procedural Issues Claimant Submission on Procedural Issues Respondent Motion on Compliance with Award on Jurisdiction Respondent Memorial on Compliance with Award on Jurisdiction Respondent Statement of Defence Claimant Response on Procedural Issues Respondent Reply on Procedural Issues Claimant Reply on Procedural Issues Respondent Reply on Claimant Reply on Procedural Issues Claimant Reply on Respondent Reply on Procedural Issues Respondent Submissions on Production of Documents Respondent Submissions on Interrogatories Claimant Response on Interrogatories Respondent Reply on Interrogatories Respondent Rejoinder on Interrogatories Claimant Motion on Information Request Claimant Motion on Cabinet Privilege Respondent Reply on Information Request Claimant Sur-Reply on Information Request Respondent Motion on Reformulated Interrogatories Claimant Reply on Reformulated Interrogatories Respondent Reply on Cabinet Privilege Respondent Rebuttal on Information Request Claimant Rejoinder on Cabinet Privilege Claimant Memorial on Merits Respondent Counter-Memorial on Merits Respondent Rejoinder on Merits Mexico Fourth Article 1128 Submission Canadian Union of Postal Worker and Council of Canadian Application for Amicus Curiae Status Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America Application for Amicus Curiae Status and Amicus Curiae Submission Claimant Response on Application for Amicus Curiae Status Canadian Union of Postal Worker and Council of Canadian Response to Claimant Response on Application Respondent Response on Application for Amicus Curiae Status Claimant Reply on Amicus Curiae Submissions Claimant Reply on Article 1128 Submission Transcription of Hearing on Merits - Day One Transcription of Hearing on Merits - Day Two Transcription of Hearing on Merits - Day Three Transcription of Hearing on Merits - Day Four Transcription of Hearing on Merits - Day Five Transcription of Hearing on Merits - Day Six Claimant Reply on Merits [PartA] Claimant Reply on Merits [PartB]", "field_59": "UPS v. Canada Award on Jurisdiction UPS v. Canada Award on the Merits UPS v. Canada Dissenting Opinion of Dean Ronald A. Cass UPS v. Canada Decision on Amicus Curiae UPS v. Canada Decision on Claim of Cabinet UPS v. Canada Decision on Document Production ami Interrogatories UPS v. Canada Decision on Filing of statement of Defense UPS v. Canada Decision on Place of Arbitration UPS v. Canada Direction of the Tribunal Concerning Document Production UPS v. Canada Direction of the Tribunal on Participation of Amicus Curiae UPS v. Canada Procedural Order 1 UPS v. Canada Procedural Order 2 UPS v. Canada Procedural Directions UPS v. Canada Procedural Directions and Order of the Tribunal UPS v. Canada Procedural Directions for Amicus Submissions UPS v. Canada Tribunal Ruling UPS v. Canada Notice of Intent UPS v. Canada Notice of Arbitration UPS v. Canada Statement of Claim UPS v. Canada Canadian Union of Postal Worker and Council of Canadian Petition to Tribunal UPS v. Canada Respondent Submission on Place of Arbitration UPS v. Canada Claimant Submission on Place of Arbitration UPS v. Canada Respondent Submission on Statement of Defence UPS v. Canada Claimant Submission on Statement of Defence UPS v. Canada Respondent Reply on Place of Arbitration UPS v. Canada Respondent Reply on Claimant Submission on Statement of Defence UPS v. Canada Claimant Reply on Respondent Submission on Statement of Defence UPS v. Canada Canadian Union of Postal Worker and Council of Canadian Petition to Tribunal UPS v. Canada Respondent Submission on Non-Party Petition UPS v. Canada Claimant Submission on Non-Party Petition UPS v. Canada Mexico First Article 1128 Submission UPS v. Canada United States First Article 1128 Submission UPS v. Canada Respondent Response on Article 1128 Submissions UPS v. Canada Canadian Union of Postal Worker and Council of Canadian Response to Respondent Submission on Petition UPS v. Canada Canadian Union of Postal Worker and Council of Canadian Response to Claimant and Mexico Submissions on Petition UPS v. Canada Claimant Amended Statement of Claim UPS v. Canada Respondent Motion on Objection to Amended Statement of Claim UPS v. Canada Respondent Memorial on Jurisdiction UPS v. Canada Claimant Counter-Memorial on Jurisdiction UPS v. Canada Respondent Reply on Jurisdiction UPS v. Canada Claimant Rejoinder on Jurisdiction UPS v. Canada United States Second Article 1128 Submission UPS v. Canada Respondent Reply on Article 1128 Submissions UPS v. Canada Claimant Reply on Article 1128 Submissions UPS v. Canada Mexico Third Article 1128 Submission UPS v. Canada United States Third Article 1128 Submission UPS v. Canada Claimant Revised Amended Statement of Claim UPS v. Canada Respondent Submission on Procedural Issues UPS v. Canada Claimant Submission on Procedural Issues UPS v. Canada Respondent Motion on Compliance with Award on Jurisdiction UPS v. Canada Respondent Memorial on Compliance with Award on Jurisdiction UPS v. Canada Respondent Statement of Defence UPS v. Canada Claimant Response on Procedural Issues UPS v. Canada Respondent Reply on Procedural Issues UPS v. Canada Claimant Reply on Procedural Issues UPS v. Canada Respondent Reply on Claimant Reply on Procedural Issues UPS v. Canada Claimant Reply on Respondent Reply on Procedural Issues UPS v. Canada Respondent Submissions on Production of Documents UPS v. Canada Respondent Submissions on Interrogatories UPS v. Canada Claimant Response on Interrogatories UPS v. Canada Respondent Reply on Interrogatories UPS v. Canada Respondent Rejoinder on Interrogatories UPS v. Canada Claimant Motion on Information Request UPS v. Canada Claimant Motion on Cabinet Privilege UPS v. Canada Respondent Reply on Information Request UPS v. Canada Claimant Sur-Reply on Information Request UPS v. Canada Respondent Motion on Reformulated Interrogatories UPS v. Canada Claimant Reply on Reformulated Interrogatories UPS v. Canada Respondent Reply on Cabinet Privilege UPS v. Canada Respondent Rebuttal on Information Request UPS v. Canada Claimant Rejoinder on Cabinet Privilege UPS v. Canada Claimant Memorial on Merits UPS v. Canada Respondent Counter-Memorial on Merits UPS v. Canada Respondent Rejoinder on Merits UPS v. Canada Mexico Fourth Article 1128 Submission UPS v. Canada Canadian Union of Postal Worker and Council of Canadian Application for Amicus Curiae Status UPS v. Canada Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America Application for Amicus Curiae Status and Amicus Curiae Submission UPS v. Canada Claimant Response on Application for Amicus Curiae Status UPS v. Canada Canadian Union of Postal Worker and Council of Canadian Response to Claimant Response on Application UPS v. Canada Respondent Response on Application for Amicus Curiae Status UPS v. Canada Claimant Reply on Amicus Curiae Submissions UPS v. Canada Claimant Reply on Article 1128 Submission UPS v. Canada Transcription of Hearing on Merits - Day One UPS v. Canada Transcription of Hearing on Merits - Day Two UPS v. Canada Transcription of Hearing on Merits - Day Three UPS v. Canada Transcription of Hearing on Merits - Day Four UPS v. Canada Transcription of Hearing on Merits - Day Five UPS v. Canada Transcription of Hearing on Merits - Day Six UPS v. Canada Claimant Reply on Merits [PartA] UPS v. Canada Claimant Reply on Merits [PartB]", "field_60": "United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Award on Jurisdiction, 22 November 2002 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Award on the Merits, 24 May 2007 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Separate Statement of Dean Ronald A. Cass, 24 May 2007 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Decision of the Tribunal on Petitions for Intervention and Participation as Amici Curiae, 17 October 2001 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Decision of the Tribunal Relating to Canada's Claim of Cabinet Privilege, 8 October 2004 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Decision of the Tribunal Relating to Document Production and Interrogatories, 21 June 2004 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Decision of the Tribunal on the Filing of a Statement of Defence, 17 October 2001 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Decision of the Tribunal on the Place of Arbitration, 17 October 2001 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Direction of the Tribunal Concerning Document Production, 1 August 2003 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Direction of the Tribunal on the Participation of Amici Curiae, 1 August 2003 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Procedural Order 1, 11 April 2001 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Procedural Order 2, 11 April 2001 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Procedural Direction of the Tribunal, 14 March 2005 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Procedural Directions and Order of the Tribunal, 4 April 2003 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Procedural Directions for Amicus Submissions, 4 April 2003 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Tribunal Ruling, 4 April 2005 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Notice of Intent, 19 January 2000 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Notice of Arbitration, 19 April 1999 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Statement of Claim, 19 April 1999 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Canadian Union of Postal Worker and Council of Canadian Petition to Tribunal, 8 November 2000 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Respondent Submission on Place of Arbitration, 30 April 2001 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Claimant Submission on Place of Arbitration, 30 April 2001 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Respondent Submission on Statement of Defence, 30 April 2001 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Claimant Submission on Statement of Defence, 30 April 2001 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Respondent Reply on Place of Arbitration, 7 May 2001 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Respondent Reply on Claimant Submission on Statement of Defence, 7 May 2001 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Reply on Respondent Submission on Statement of Defence, 7 May 2001 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Canadian Union of Postal Worker and Council of Canadian Petition to Tribunal, 10 May 2001 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Respondent Submission on Non-Party Petition, 28 May 2001 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Claimant Submission on Non-Party Petition, 28 May 2001 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Mexico First Article 1128 Submission, 11 June 2001 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, United States First Article 1128 Submission, 11 June 2001 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Respondent Response on Article 1128 Submissions, 15 June 2001 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Canadian Union of Postal Worker and Council of Canadian Response to Respondent Submission on Petition, 18 June 2001 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Canadian Union of Postal Worker and Council of Canadian Response to Claimant and Mexico Submissions on Petition, 20 June 2001 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Claimant Amended Statement of Claim, 30 November 2001 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Respondent Motion on Objection to Amended Statement of Claim, 7 January 2002 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Respondent Memorial on Jurisdiction, 14 February 2002 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Claimant Counter-Memorial on Jurisdiction, 26 March 2002 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Respondent Reply on Jurisdiction, 12 April 2002 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Claimant Rejoinder on Jurisdiction, 19 April 2002 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, United States Second Article 1128 Submission, 13 March 2002 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Respondent Reply on Article 1128 Submissions, 21 May 2002 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Claimant Reply on Article 1128 Submissions, 21 May 2002 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Mexico Third Article 1128 Submission, 23 August 2002 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, United States Third Article 1128 Submission, 1 August 2002 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Respondent Reply on Article 1128 Submissions, 3 September 2002 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Claimant Reply on Article 1128 Submissions, 3 September 2002 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Claimant Revised Amended Statement of Claim, 20 December 2002 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Respondent Submission on Procedural Issues, 24 January 2003 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Claimant Submission on Procedural Issues, 24 January 2003 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Respondent Motion on Compliance with Award on Jurisdiction, 7 February 2003 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Respondent Memorial on Compliance with Award on Jurisdiction, 7 February 2003 United Parcel Service of America Inc. v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/02/1, Respondent Statement of Defence, 7 February 2003 United Parcel Se", "field_61": "20021122 20070524 20011017 20041008 20040621 20011011 20030801 20010411 20050314 20030404 20050404 20000119 19990419 20001108 20010430 20010507 20010510 20010528 20010611 20010615 20010618 20010620 20011130 20020107 20020214 20020326 20020412 20020419 20020313 20020521 20020823 20020801 20020903 20021220 20030124 20030207 20030214 20030225 20030226 20030321 20030326 20040226 20040224 20040304 20040305 20040309 20040609 20040617 20040629 20040706 20040726 20040804 20040813 20040826 20050323 20050622 20051006 20051020 20051101 20051103 20051110 20051212 20051213 20051214 20051215 20051216 20051217 20050815", "field_62": "234", "Filename": "db://FE_SelectDisputeViewForContegraSearch#RowId=896", "field_102": "2414,2415,2416,2418,8125,8128,8132,8134", "field_103": "652,652,652,652,652,652,652,652", "field_104": "8071,8136,8140,8142,8146,8151,8153,8154,8156,8158,8161", "field_105": "900,900,900,900,900,900,900,900,900,900,900", "field_150": "20876 20875" }, "paragraphs": null, "hitCount": 0, "highlightedFields": null }, { "fields": { "rowid": "898 5325 5326 5327 5328 5329 5330 5331 5332 5333 5334 5335 5336 5337 5338 5339 5340 5341 5342 5343 5344 5345 5346 5347 5348 5349 5350 5351 5352 5353 5354 7980 7981 7982 7983", "disputeid": "13301", "disputecitation": "Vito G. Gallo v. Government of Canada (PCA Case No. 2008-03)", "fullcitation": "Vito G. Gallo v. Government of Canada (PCA Case No. 2008-03)", "disputestartdate": "20070330", "isdisputecitation": "1", "modifiedon": "20210216", "field_respondentstates": "Canada", "field_100": "13666", "field_101": "578", "field_106": "14298", "field_108": "403", "field_109": "403", "field_110": "20070330", "field_145": "332", "field_67": "Vito G. Gallo v. Government of Canada", "field_68": "PCA Case No. 2008-03", "field_69": "12324", "field_70": "11086", "field_71": "UN/0029", "field_72": "Gallo v. Canada", "field_73": "Vito G. Gallo v. Government of Canada (PCA Case No. 2008-03)", "field_74": "1995", "field_77": "2020", "field_78": "112", "field_82": "1921", "field_83": "113", "contenttypedatamasterid": "19052 19053 19054 19055 19056 19057 19058 19059 19060 19061 19062 19067 19068 19069 19070 19071 19072 19073 19074 19075 19076 19077 19078 19079 19080 19081 19082 19083 19084 19085 23265 23266 23267 23268", "field_documenttypeid": "1080 1072 1068 1076 1075 1079 1074 1077", "field_137": "True", "field_56": "15203", "field_57": "UN/0029/01 UN/0029/02 UN/0029/03 UN/0029/04 UN/0029/05 UN/0029/06 UN/0029/07 UN/0029/08 UN/0029/09 UN/0029/10 UN/0029/11 UN/0029/13 UN/0029/14 UN/0029/15 UN/0029/16 UN/0029/17 UN/0029/18 UN/0029/19 UN/0029/20 UN/0029/21 UN/0029/22 UN/0029/23 UN/0029/24 UN/0029/25 UN/0029/26 UN/0029/27 UN/0029/28 UN/0029/29 UN/0029/30 UN/0029/31 UN/0029/32 UN/0029/33 UN/0029/34 UN/0029/35", "field_58": "Procedural Order 1 Procedural Order 1 (amended) Procedural Order 2 (amended) Confidentiality Order Decision on Place of Arbitration Decision on Arbitrator Challenge Notice of Intent to Submit of Claim to Arbitration Notice of Arbitration Statement of Claim [Redacted] Statement of Defence (Public Version) Investor's Memorial (Public Version) Investor's Submission on Ownership of the Investment (confidential version) Respondent's Submission on Jurisdiction [Redacted] Award [Redacted] Written Submission of Canada on Procedural Matters Claimant's Submissions on Procedural Matters Respondent's Letter to the Tribunal Claimant's Letter to the Tribunal Procedural Order No. 3 Resignation Letter of an Arbitrator Procedural Order No. 4 Tribunal's Letter to the Parties Procedural Order No. 5 Procedural Order No. 6 Claimant Post-Hearing Submission Respondent Post-Hearing Submission Counter-Memorial [Public Version] [Part A] Counter-Memorial [Public Version] [Part B] Counter-Memorial [Public Version] [Part C] Counter-Memorial [Public Version] [Part D]", "field_59": "Gallo v. Canada Procedural Order 1 Gallo v. Canada Procedural Order 1 (amended) Gallo v. Canada Procedural Order 2 (amended) Gallo v. Canada Confidentiality Order Gallo v. Canada Decision on Place of Arbitration Gallo v. Canada Decision on Arbitrator Challenge Gallo v. Canada Notice of Intent to Submit of Claim to Arbitration Gallo v. Canada Notice of Arbitration Gallo v. Canada Statement of Claim [Redacted] Gallo v. Canada Statement of Defence (Public Version) Gallo v. Canada Investor's Memorial (Public Version) Gallo v. Canada Investor's Submission on Ownership of the Investment (confidential version) Gallo v. Canada Respondent's Submission on Jurisdiction [Redacted] Gallo v. Canada Award [Redacted] Gallo v. Canada Written Submission of Canada on Procedural Matters Gallo v. Canada Claimant's Submissions on Procedural Matters Gallo v. Canada Respondent's Letter to the Tribunal Gallo v. Canada Claimant's Letter to the Tribunal Gallo v. Canada Procedural Order No. 3 Gallo v. Canada Resignation Letter of an Arbitrator Gallo v. Canada Procedural Order No. 4 Gallo v. Canada Tribunal's Letter to the Parties Gallo v. Canada Procedural Order No. 5 Gallo v. Canada Procedural Order No. 6 Gallo v. Canada Claimant Post-Hearing Submission Gallo v. Canada Respondent Post-Hearing Submission Gallo v. Canada Counter-Memorial [Public Version] [Part A] Gallo v. Canada Counter-Memorial [Public Version] [Part B] Gallo v. Canada Counter-Memorial [Public Version] [Part C] Gallo v. Canada Counter-Memorial [Public Version] [Part D]", "field_60": "V. G. Gallo v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-03, Procedural Order No. 1, 4 June 2008 Vito G. Gallo v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-03, Procedural Order No. 1 (Amended), 10 March 2009 Vito G. Gallo v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-03, Procedural Order No. 2 (Amended), 10 February 2009 Vito G. Gallo v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-03, Confidentiality Order, 4 June 2008 Vito G. Gallo v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-03, Decision on Place of Arbitration, 4 June 2008 Vito G. Gallo v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-03, PCA Administered, Decision on the Challenge to Mr. J. Christopher Thomas, QC, 14 October 2009 Vito G. Gallo v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-03, Notice of Intent to Submit of Claim to Arbitration, 12 October 2006 Vito G. Gallo v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-03, Notice of Arbitration, 26 March 2007 Vito G. Gallo v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-03, Statement of Claim, 23 June 2008 [Redacted] Vito G. Gallo v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-03, Statement of Defence (Public Version), 15 September 2008 Vito G. Gallo v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-03, Investor's Memorial (Public Version), 1 March 2010 Vito G. Gallo v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-03, Investor's Submission on Ownership of the Investment (confidential version), 25 October 2010 Vito G. Gallo v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-03, Respondent's Submission on Jurisdiction, 20 December 2010 [Redacted] Vito G. Gallo v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-03, Award, 15 September 2011 [Redacted] Vito G. Gallo v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-03, Written Submission of Canada on Procedural Matters, 29 February 2008 Vito G. Gallo v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-03, Claimant's Submissions on Procedural Matters, 29 February 2008 Vito G. Gallo v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-03, Respondent's Letter to the Tribunal, 18 March 2008 Vito G. Gallo v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-03, Claimant's Letter to the Tribunal, 18 March 2008 Vito G. Gallo v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-03, Claimant's Letter to the Tribunal, 20 March 2008 Vito G. Gallo v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-03, Respondent's Letter to the Tribunal, 20 March 2008 Vito G. Gallo v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-03, Procedural Order No. 3, 8 April 2009 Vito G. Gallo v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-03, Resignation Letter of an Arbitrator, 21 October 2009 Vito G. Gallo v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-03, Procedural Order No. 4, 21 December 2009 Vito G. Gallo v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-03, Tribunal's Letter to the Parties, 30 December 2009 Vito G. Gallo v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-03, Tribunal's Letter to the Parties, 30 August 2010 Vito G. Gallo v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-03, Tribunal's Letter to the Parties, 17 September 2010 Vito G. Gallo v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-03, Procedural Order No. 5, 19 January 2011 Vito G. Gallo v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-03, Procedural Order No. 6, 30 August 2011 Vito G. Gallo v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-03, Claimant Post-Hearing Submission, 8 April 2011 Vito G. Gallo v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-03, Respondent Post-Hearing Submission, 8 April 2011 Vito G. Gallo v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-03, Counter-Memorial [Public Version], 29 June 2010 [Part A] Vito G. Gallo v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-03, Counter-Memorial [Public Version], 29 June 2010 [Part B] Vito G. Gallo v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-03, Counter-Memorial [Public Version], 29 June 2010 [Part C] Vito G. Gallo v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2008-03, Counter-Memorial [Public Version], 29 June 2010 [Part D]", "field_61": "20080604 20090310 20090210 20091014 20061012 20070326 20080623 20080915 20100301 20101025 20101220 20110915 20080229 20080318 20080320 20090408 20091021 20091221 20091230 20100830 20100917 20110119 20110830 20110408 20100629", "field_62": "234", "Filename": "db://FE_SelectDisputeViewForContegraSearch#RowId=898", "field_102": "3083,3084", "field_103": "728,1755", "field_104": "3085,8069", "field_105": "900,900" }, "paragraphs": null, "hitCount": 0, "highlightedFields": null }, { "fields": { "rowid": "1050 7369 7370 7371 7372 7721 8076 8077 8078 8079 8080 8081 8082", "disputeid": "13454", "disputecitation": "Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC v. Government of Canada (ICSID Case No. UNCT/20/3)", "fullcitation": "Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC v. Government of Canada (ICSID Case No. UNCT/20/3)", "isdisputecitation": "1", "modifiedon": "20210126", "field_respondentstates": "Canada", "field_109": "403", "field_67": "Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC v. Government of Canada", "field_68": "ICSID Case No. UNCT/20/3", "field_69": "12324", "field_70": "11086", "field_71": "UN/0183", "field_72": "Westmoreland v. Canada", "field_73": "Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC v. Government of Canada (ICSID Case No. UNCT/20/3)", "field_74": "2549", "field_77": "24225", "field_78": "112", "field_82": "8179", "field_83": "113", "contenttypedatamasterid": "21135 21136 21137 21138 21562 23361 23362 23363 23364 23365 23366 23367", "field_documenttypeid": "1075 1080 1079 1077", "field_137": "True", "field_56": "15356", "field_57": "UN/0183/01 UN/0183/02 UN/0183/03 UN/0183/04 UN/0183/11 UN/0183/05 UN/0183/06 UN/0183/07 UN/0183/08 UN/0183/09 UN/0183/10 UN/0183/12", "field_58": "Notice of Arbitration and Statement of Claim Procedural Order No. 1 Confidentiality Order Procedural Order No. 3 Decision on Bifurcation Respondent Statement of Defence Request for Bifurcation Claimant Response to Request for Bifurcation Reply to Claimant Response to Request for Bifurcation Rejoinder to Respondent Reply in Support of its Request for Bifurcation Procedural Order No. 2 Hearing Protocol Hearing on Bifurcation Transcript", "field_59": "Westmoreland v. Canada Notice of Arbitration and Statement of Claim Westmoreland v. Canada Procedural Order No. 1 Westmoreland v. Canada Confidentiality Order Westmoreland v. Canada Procedural Order No. 3 Decision on Bifurcation Westmoreland v. Canada Respondent Statement of Defence Westmoreland v. Canada Request for Bifurcation Westmoreland v. Canada Claimant Response to Request for Bifurcation Westmoreland v. Canada Reply to Claimant Response to Request for Bifurcation Westmoreland v. Canada Rejoinder to Respondent Reply in Support of its Request for Bifurcation Westmoreland v. Canada Procedural Order No. 2 Hearing Protocol Westmoreland v. Canada Hearing on Bifurcation Transcript", "field_60": "Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC (formerly Westmoreland Coal Company) v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/20/3, Notice of Arbitration, 19 November 2018 Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/20/3, Notice of Arbitration and Statement of Claim, 12 August 2019 Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/20/3, Procedural Order No. 1, 22 April 2020 Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/20/3, Confidentiality Order, 22 April 2020 Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/20/3, Procedural Order No. 3 Decision on Bifurcation, 20 October 2020 Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/20/3, Respondent Statement of Defence, 26 June 2020 Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/20/3, Request for Bifurcation, 24 July 2020 Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/20/3, Claimant Response to Request for Bifurcation, 14 August 2020 Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/20/3, Reply to Claimant Response to Request for Bifurcation, 28 August 2020 Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/20/3, Rejoinder to Respondent Reply in Support of its Request for Bifurcation, 11 September 2020 Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/20/3, Procedural Order No. 2 Hearing Protocol, 21 September 2020 Westmoreland Mining Holdings LLC v. Government of Canada, ICSID Case No. UNCT/20/3, Hearing on Bifurcation Transcript, 24 September 2020", "field_61": "20181119 20190812 20200422 20201020 20200626 20200724 20200814 20200828 20200911 20200921 20200924", "field_62": "234", "field_299": "15532", "field_63": "false", "Filename": "db://FE_SelectDisputeViewForContegraSearch#RowId=1050", "field_102": "5665,6166,7559,7560,8060,8062", "field_103": "712,712,1793,712,712,712", "field_104": "24357,24358,24360,24477,2989,3368,5038,5462,6288,6289,6573,7356,7462", "field_105": "900,900,900,25754,25754,900,1143,900,900,900,25754,25754,900" }, "paragraphs": null, "hitCount": 0, "highlightedFields": null }, { "fields": { "rowid": "1030 7214 7215 7216 7217", "disputeid": "13434", "disputecitation": "William Jay Greiner and Malbaie River Outfitters Inc. v. Government of Canada", "fullcitation": "William Jay Greiner and Malbaie River Outfitters Inc. v. Government of Canada", "isdisputecitation": "1", "field_respondentstates": "Canada", "field_109": "403", "field_67": "William Jay Greiner and Malbaie River Outfitters Inc. v. Government of Canada", "field_69": "12324", "field_70": "11086", "field_71": "UN/0162", "field_72": "Greiner v. Canada", "field_73": "William Jay Greiner and Malbaie River Outfitters Inc. v. Government of Canada", "contenttypedatamasterid": "20978 20979 20980 20981", "field_documenttypeid": "1076 1075 1079", "field_137": "True", "field_56": "15336", "field_57": "UN/0162/01 UN/0162/02 UN/0162/03 UN/0162/04", "field_58": "Notice of Intent Notice of Arbitration Amended Notice of Arbitration Withdrawal Letter", "field_59": "Greiner v. Canada Notice of Intent Greiner v. Canada Notice of Arbitration Greiner v. Canada Amended Notice of Arbitration Greiner v. Canada Withdrawal Letter", "field_60": "William Jay Greiner and Malbaie River Outfitters Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Notice of Intent, 16 September 2008 William Jay Greiner and Malbaie River Outfitters Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Notice of Arbitration, 2 November 2010 William Jay Greiner and Malbaie River Outfitters Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Amended Notice of Arbitration, 2 December 2010 William Jay Greiner and Malbaie River Outfitters Inc. v. Government of Canada, UNCITRAL, Withdrawal Letter, 10 June 2011", "field_61": "20080916 20101102 20101202 20110610", "field_62": "234", "Filename": "db://FE_SelectDisputeViewForContegraSearch#RowId=1030" }, "paragraphs": null, "hitCount": 0, "highlightedFields": null }, { "fields": { "rowid": "900 5382 5383 5384 5385 5386 5387 5388 5389 5390 5391 5392 5393 5394 5395 5396 5397 5398 5399 5400 5401 5402 5403 5404 5405 5406 5407 5408 5409 5410 5411 5412 5413 5414 5415 5416 5417 5418 5419 5420 5421 5422 5423 5424 5425 5426 5427 5428 5429 5430 5431 5432 5433 5434 5435 5436 5437 5438 5439 5440 5441 5442 5443 5444 5445 5446 5447 5448 5449 5450 5451 5452 5453 5454 5455 5456 5457 5458", "disputeid": "13303", "disputecitation": "William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada (PCA Case No. 2009-04)", "fullcitation": "William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada (PCA Case No. 2009-04)", "disputestartdate": "20080526", "isdisputecitation": "1", "modifiedon": "20210216", "field_respondentstates": "Canada", "field_100": "13668,13669,13670,13671,13672", "field_101": "578,578,578,578,578", "field_106": "14297", "field_108": "403", "field_109": "403", "field_110": "20080526", "field_145": "332", "field_67": "William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada", "field_68": "PCA Case No. 2009-04", "field_69": "12324", "field_70": "11086", "field_71": "UN/0031", "field_72": "Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada", "field_73": "William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada (PCA Case No. 2009-04)", "field_74": "2067", "field_77": "1951", "field_78": "112", "field_82": "1962", "field_83": "113", "contenttypedatamasterid": "19119 19120 19121 19122 19123 19124 19125 19126 19127 19128 19129 19130 19131 19132 19133 19134 19135 19136 19137 19138 19139 19140 19141 19142 19143 19144 19145 19146 19147 19148 19149 19150 19151 19152 19153 19154 19155 19156 19157 19158 19159 19160 19161 19162 19163 19164 19165 19166 19167 19168 19169 19170 19171 19172 19173 19174 19175 19176 19177 19178 19179 19180 19181 19182 19183 19184 19185 19186 19187 19188 19189 19190 19191 19192 19193 19194 19195", "field_documenttypeid": "1080 1076 1075 1079 1078 1081 1077 1067 1074", "field_137": "True", "field_56": "15205", "field_57": "UN/0031/01 UN/0031/02 UN/0031/03 UN/0031/04 UN/0031/05 UN/0031/06 UN/0031/07 UN/0031/08 UN/0031/09 UN/0031/10 UN/0031/11 UN/0031/12 UN/0031/13 UN/0031/14 UN/0031/15 UN/0031/16 UN/0031/17 UN/0031/18 UN/0031/19 UN/0031/20 UN/0031/21 UN/0031/22 UN/0031/23 UN/0031/24 UN/0031/25 UN/0031/26 UN/0031/27 UN/0031/28 UN/0031/29 UN/0031/30 UN/0031/31 UN/0031/32 UN/0031/33 UN/0031/34 UN/0031/35 UN/0031/36 UN/0031/37 UN/0031/38 UN/0031/39 UN/0031/40 UN/0031/41 UN/0031/42 UN/0031/43 UN/0031/44 UN/0031/45 UN/0031/46 UN/0031/47 UN/0031/48 UN/0031/49 UN/0031/50 UN/0031/51 UN/0031/52 UN/0031/53 UN/0031/54 UN/0031/55 UN/0031/56 UN/0031/57 UN/0031/58 UN/0031/59 UN/0031/60 UN/0031/61 UN/0031/62 UN/0031/63 UN/0031/64 UN/0031/65 UN/0031/66 UN/0031/67 UN/0031/68 UN/0031/69 UN/0031/70 UN/0031/71 UN/0031/72 UN/0031/73 UN/0031/74 UN/0031/75 UN/0031/76 UN/0031/77", "field_58": "Procedural Order 1 Procedural Order 2 (Confidentiality Order) Procedural Order 3 Procedural Order 4 Procedural Order 5 Notice of Intent Notice of Arbitration Statement of Claim Statement of Defence of the Government of Canada Amended Statement of Claim Amended Statement of Defence of the Government of Canada Memorial of the Investors Counter-Memorial (Public Version) Procedural Order No. 6 Procedural Order No. 7 Procedural Order No. 8 Procedural Order No. 9 Procedural Order No. 10 Procedural Order No. 11 Procedural Order No. 12 Procedural Order No. 13 Procedural Order No. 14 Procedural Order No. 15 Procedural Order No. 16 Procedural Order No. 17 Investors Reply Memorial Procedural Order No. 18 United States Article 1128 Submission Respondent Rejoinder Press Release Regarding Live Streaming of Hearing on Jurisdiction and Liability Award on Jurisdiction and Liability Dissenting Opinion of Professor Donald McRae Notice of Set Aside Application Transcript of Merits Hearing - Day One Transcript of Merits Hearing - Day Two Transcript of Merits Hearing - Day Three Transcript of Merits Hearing - Day Four Transcript of Merits Hearing - Day Five Transcript of Merits Hearing - Day Six Transcript of Merits Hearing - Day Seven Transcript of Merits Hearing - Day Eight Expert Report of Robert G. Connelly Expert Report of Lawrence E. Smith, Q.C. Reply Expert Report of David Estrin Expert Report of T. Murray Rankin, Q.C. Rejoinder Expert Report of Lawrence E. Smith, Q.C. Procedural Order No. 19 Procedural Order No. 20 Procedural Order No. 21 Claimants Damages Memorial [Redacted] Federal Court of Canada Order Procedural Order No. 22 Procedural Order No. 23 Procedural Order No. 24 Procedural Order No. 25 Procedural Order No. 26 PCA Press Release re Public Hearing on Damages Respondent Counter-Memorial on Damages Claimants Reply Memorial on Damages Respondent Rejoinder Memorial on Damages United States 1128 Submission on Damages Claimants Response to 1128 Submission on Damages Judgment of the Federal Court of Canada Transcript - Day 1 Transcript - Day 2 Transcript - Day 3 Transcript - Day 4 Transcript - Day 5 Transcript - Day 6 Transcript - Day 7 Transcript - Day 8 Investors Response to 1128 Submission of Non-Disputing Party Award on Damages Concurring Opinion of Professor Bryan P. Schwartz Procedural Order No. 27 Regarding Interest on the Award on Damages and the Calendar for Costs Submissions Expert Report of David Estrin", "field_59": "Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Procedural Order 1 Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Procedural Order 2 (Confidentiality Order) Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Procedural Order 3 Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Procedural Order 4 Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Procedural Order 5 Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Notice of Intent Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Notice of Arbitration Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Statement of Claim Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Statement of Defence of the Government of Canada Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Amended Statement of Claim Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Amended Statement of Defence of the Government of Canada Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Memorial of the Investors Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Counter-Memorial (Public Version) Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Procedural Order No. 6 Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Procedural Order No. 7 Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Procedural Order No. 8 Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Procedural Order No. 9 Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Procedural Order No. 10 Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Procedural Order No. 11 Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Procedural Order No. 12 Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Procedural Order No. 13 Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Procedural Order No. 14 Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Procedural Order No. 15 Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Procedural Order No. 16 Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Procedural Order No. 17 Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Investors Reply Memorial Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Procedural Order No. 18 Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada United States Article 1128 Submission Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Respondent Rejoinder Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Press Release Regarding Live Streaming of Hearing on Jurisdiction and Liability Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Award on Jurisdiction and Liability Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Dissenting Opinion of Professor Donald McRae Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Notice of Set Aside Application Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Transcript of Merits Hearing - Day One Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Transcript of Merits Hearing - Day Two Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Transcript of Merits Hearing - Day Three Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Transcript of Merits Hearing - Day Four Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Transcript of Merits Hearing - Day Five Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Transcript of Merits Hearing - Day Six Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Transcript of Merits Hearing - Day Seven Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Transcript of Merits Hearing - Day Eight Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Expert Report of Robert G. Connelly Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Expert Report of Lawrence E. Smith, Q.C. Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Reply Expert Report of David Estrin Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Expert Report of T. Murray Rankin, Q.C. Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Rejoinder Expert Report of Lawrence E. Smith, Q.C. Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Procedural Order No. 19 Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Procedural Order No. 20 Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Procedural Order No. 21 Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Claimants Damages Memorial [Redacted] Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Federal Court of Canada Order Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Procedural Order No. 22 Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Procedural Order No. 23 Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Procedural Order No. 24 Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Procedural Order No. 25 Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Procedural Order No. 26 Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada PCA Press Release re Public Hearing on Damages Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Respondent Counter-Memorial on Damages Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Claimants Reply Memorial on Damages Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Respondent Rejoinder Memorial on Damages Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada United States 1128 Submission on Damages Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Claimants Response to 1128 Submission on Damages Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Judgment of the Federal Court of Canada Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Transcript - Day 1 Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Transcript - Day 2 Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Transcript - Day 3 Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Transcript - Day 4 Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Transcript - Day 5 Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Transcript - Day 6 Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Transcript - Day 7 Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Transcript - Day 8 Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Investors Response to 1128 Submission of Non-Disputing Party Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Award on Damages Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Concurring Opinion of Professor Bryan P. Schwartz Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Procedural Order No. 27 Regarding Interest on the Award on Damages and the Calendar for Costs Submissions Clayton/Bilcon v. Canada Expert Report of David Estrin", "field_60": "William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-05, Procedural Order No. 1, 9 April 2009 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Procedural Order 2 (Confidentiality Order), 4 May 2009 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Procedural Order No. 3, 3 June 2009 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Procedural Order No. 4, 17 July 2009 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-4, Procedural Order No. 5, 24 July 2009 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-4, Notice of Intent, 5 February 2008 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Notice of Arbitration, 26 May 2008 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Statement of Claim, 30 January 2009 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Statement of Defence of the Government of Canada, 4 May 2009 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Amended Statement of Claim, 3 December 2009 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Amended Statement of Defence of the Government of Canada, 18 December 2009 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Memorial of the Investors, 25 July 2011 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Counter-Memorial (Public Version), 9 December 2011 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Procedural Order No. 6, 26 August 2009 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Procedural Order No. 7, 20 November 2009 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Procedural Order No. 8, 25 November 2009 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Procedural Order No. 9, 16 July 2010 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Procedural Order No. 10, 2 September 2010 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Procedural Order No. 11, 10 August 2011 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Procedural Order No. 12, 2 May 2012 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Procedural Order No. 13, 11 July 2012 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Procedural Order No. 14, 19 September 2012 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Procedural Order No. 15, 17 October 2012 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Procedural Order No. 16, 15 November 2012 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Procedural Order No. 17, 23 January 2013 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Investors Reply Memorial, 21 December 2011 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Procedural Order No. 18, 16 April 2013 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, United States Article 1128 Submission, 19 April 2013 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Respondent Rejoinder, 21 March 2013 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Press Release Regarding Live Streaming of Hearing on Jurisdiction and Liability, 15 October 2013 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Award on Jurisdiction and Liability, 17 March 2015 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Dissenting Opinion of Professor Donald McRae, 17 March 2015 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Notice of Set Aside Application, 16 June 2015 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Transcript of Merits Hearing - Day One, 22 October 2013 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Transcript of Merits Hearing - Day Two, 23 October 2013 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Transcript of Merits Hearing - Day Three, 24 October 2013 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Transcript of Merits Hearing - Day Four, 25 October 2013 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Transcript of Merits Hearing - Day Five, 28 October 2013 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Transcript of Merits Hearing - Day Six, 29 October 2013 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Transcript of Merits Hearing - Day Seven, 30 October 2013 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Transcript of Merits Hearing - Day Eight, 31 October 2013 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Expert Report of Robert G. Connelly, 2 December 2011 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Expert Report of Lawrence E. Smith, Q.C., 7 December 2011 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Reply Expert Report of David Estrin, 19 December 2012 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Expert Report of T. Murray Rankin, Q.C., 21 December 2012 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Rejoinder Expert Report of Lawrence E. Smith, Q.C., 21 March 2013 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Procedural Order No. 19, 10 August 2015 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Procedural Order No. 20, 5 January 2016 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Procedural Order No. 21, 6 June 2016 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Claimants Damages Memorial, 10 March 2017 [Redacted] William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Federal Court of Canada Order, 22 February 2017 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Procedural Order No. 22, 14 February 2017 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Procedural Order No. 23, 26 April 2017 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Procedural Order No. 24, 14 August 2017 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Procedural Order No. 25, 17 November 2017 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Procedural Order No. 26, 8 December 2017 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, PCA Press Release re Public Hearing on Damages, 6 February 2018 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, PCA Press Release re Public Hearing on Damages, 6 February 2018 [French] William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Respondent Counter-Memorial on Damages, 9 June 2017 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Claimants Reply Memorial on Damages, 23 August 2017 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Respondent Rejoinder Memorial on Damages, 6 November 2017 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, United States 1128 Submission on Damages, 29 December 2017 William Ralph Clayton and others v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2009-04, Claimants Response to 1128 Submission on Damages, 15 January 2018 William Ralph Cl", "field_61": "20090409 20090504 20090603 20090717 20090724 20080205 20080526 20090130 20091203 20091218 20110725 20111209 20090826 20091120 20091125 20100716 20100902 20110810 20120502 20120711 20120919 20121017 20121115 20130123 20111221 20130416 20130419 20130321 20131015 20150317 20150616 20131022 20131023 20131024 20131025 20131028 20131029 20131030 20131031 20111202 20111207 20121219 20121221 20150810 20160105 20160606 20170310 20170222 20170214 20170426 20170814 20171117 20171208 20180206 20170609 20170823 20171106 20171229 20180115 20180502 20180219 20180220 20180221 20180222 20180223 20180224 20180226 20180228 20130517 20190110 20190508 20110708", "field_62": "234 235", "field_299": "15536", "Filename": "db://FE_SelectDisputeViewForContegraSearch#RowId=900", "field_102": "2413,2989,4344,4345,4347,4349,6207,6210,6722,6725,6726,8042,8128,8132,8134", "field_103": "652,652,1445,652,652,1445,654,1459,1445,1445,1445,1724,850,850,652", "field_104": "3010,3269,3368,3379,3380,3381,4341,4354,4355,4475,4850,5462,6188,7462,8071,8072,8151", "field_105": "889,900,900,900,900,900,900,900,900,900,889,900,1460,900,900,900,900", "field_150": "21077,21096,21109 21076,21096,21109 21076,21077,21119,21120 21076,21077 21096,21109,21120 21096,21109,21119" }, "paragraphs": null, "hitCount": 0, "highlightedFields": null }, { "fields": { "rowid": "948 6169 6170 6171 6172 6173 6174 6175 6176 6177 6178 6179 6180 6181 6182 6183 6184 6185 6186 6187 6188 6189 6190 6191 6192 6193 6194 6195 6196 6197 6198 6199 6200 6201 6202 6203 6204 6205 6206", "disputeid": "13351", "disputecitation": "Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada (PCA Case No. 2013-22)", "fullcitation": "Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada (PCA Case No. 2013-22)", "isdisputecitation": "1", "field_respondentstates": "Canada", "field_100": "13719", "field_101": "578", "field_106": "14297", "field_108": "403", "field_109": "403", "field_67": "Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada", "field_68": "PCA Case No. 2013-22", "field_69": "12324", "field_70": "11090", "field_71": "UN/0079", "field_72": "Windstream v. Canada", "field_73": "Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada (PCA Case No. 2013-22)", "field_74": "2503", "field_77": "2290", "field_78": "112", "field_82": "7906", "field_83": "113", "contenttypedatamasterid": "19924 19925 19926 19927 19928 19929 19930 19931 19932 19933 19934 19935 19936 19937 19938 19939 19940 19941 19942 19943 19944 19945 19946 19947 19948 19949 19950 19951 19952 19953 19954 19955 19956 19957 19958 19959 19960 19961", "field_documenttypeid": "1076 1075 1079 1080 1077 1074", "field_137": "True", "field_56": "15253", "field_57": "UN/0079/01 UN/0079/02 UN/0079/03 UN/0079/04 UN/0079/05 UN/0079/06 UN/0079/07 UN/0079/08 UN/0079/09 UN/0079/10 UN/0079/11 UN/0079/12 UN/0079/13 UN/0079/14 UN/0079/15 UN/0079/16 UN/0079/17 UN/0079/18 UN/0079/19 UN/0079/20 UN/0079/21 UN/0079/22 UN/0079/23 UN/0079/24 UN/0079/25 UN/0079/26 UN/0079/27 UN/0079/28 UN/0079/29 UN/0079/30 UN/0079/31 UN/0079/32 UN/0079/33 UN/0079/34 UN/0079/35 UN/0079/36 UN/0079/37 UN/0079/38", "field_58": "Notice of Intent Notice of Arbitration Respondent Response to Notice of Arbitration Procedural Order No. 1 Confidentiality Order Amended Noticed of Arbitration Amended Respondent Response to Notice of Arbitration Procedural Order No. 2 Claimant Memorial Procedural Order No. 3 Procedural Order No. 4 Annex A to Procedural Order No. 1 (Revised) Respondent Counter-Memorial Procedural Order No. 5 Claimant Reply Memorial Press Release Regarding Live Streaming of Hearing Scheduled from 15 to 26 February 2016 Respondent Rejoinder Memorial United States Article 1128 Submission Transcript of Hearing - Day 1 Transcript of Hearing - Day 2 Transcript of Hearing - Day 3 Transcript of Hearing - Day 4 Transcript of Hearing - Day 5 Transcript of Hearing - Day 6 Transcript of Hearing - Day 7 Transcript of Hearing - Day 8 Transcript of Hearing - Day 9 Transcript of Hearing - Day 10 Claimant Reply to the Article 1128 Submissions of the United States and Mexico Government of Canada Reply to the Article 1128 Submissions of the United States and Mexico Claimant Costs Submissions Government of Canada Submission on Costs Government of Canada Reply to the Claimant Submission on Costs Claimant Reply Costs Submissions Award Mexico Article 1128 Submission Revised Confidentiality Order", "field_59": "Windstream v. Canada Notice of Intent Windstream v. Canada Notice of Arbitration Windstream v. Canada Respondent Response to Notice of Arbitration Windstream v. Canada Procedural Order No. 1 Windstream v. Canada Confidentiality Order Windstream v. Canada Amended Noticed of Arbitration Windstream v. Canada Amended Respondent Response to Notice of Arbitration Windstream v. Canada Procedural Order No. 2 Windstream v. Canada Claimant Memorial Windstream v. Canada Procedural Order No. 3 Windstream v. Canada Procedural Order No. 4 Windstream v. Canada Annex A to Procedural Order No. 1 (Revised) Windstream v. Canada Respondent Counter-Memorial Windstream v. Canada Procedural Order No. 5 Windstream v. Canada Claimant Reply Memorial Windstream v. Canada Press Release Regarding Live Streaming of Hearing Scheduled from 15 to 26 February 2016 Windstream v. Canada Respondent Rejoinder Memorial Windstream v. Canada United States Article 1128 Submission Windstream v. Canada Transcript of Hearing - Day 1 Windstream v. Canada Transcript of Hearing - Day 2 Windstream v. Canada Transcript of Hearing - Day 3 Windstream v. Canada Transcript of Hearing - Day 4 Windstream v. Canada Transcript of Hearing - Day 5 Windstream v. Canada Transcript of Hearing - Day 6 Windstream v. Canada Transcript of Hearing - Day 7 Windstream v. Canada Transcript of Hearing - Day 8 Windstream v. Canada Transcript of Hearing - Day 9 Windstream v. Canada Transcript of Hearing - Day 10 Windstream v. Canada Claimant Reply to the Article 1128 Submissions of the United States and Mexico Windstream v. Canada Government of Canada Reply to the Article 1128 Submissions of the United States and Mexico Windstream v. Canada Claimant Costs Submissions Windstream v. Canada Government of Canada Submission on Costs Windstream v. Canada Government of Canada Reply to the Claimant Submission on Costs Windstream v. Canada Claimant Reply Costs Submissions Windstream v. Canada Award Windstream v. Canada Mexico Article 1128 Submission Windstream v. Canada Revised Confidentiality Order", "field_60": "Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2013-22, Notice of Intent, 17 October 2012 Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2013-22, Notice of Arbitration, 28 January 2013 Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2013-22, Respondent Response to Notice of Arbitration, 26 April 2013 Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2013-22, Procedural Order No. 1, 16 September 2013 Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2013-22, Confidentiality Order, 16 September 2013 Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2013-22, Amended Noticed of Arbitration, 5 November 2013 Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2013-22, Amended Respondent Response to Notice of Arbitration, 5 December 2013 Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2013-22, Procedural Order No. 2, 12 January 2014 Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2013-22, Claimant Memorial, 19 August 2014 Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2013-22, Procedural Order No. 3, 21 January 2015 Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2013-22, Procedural Order No. 4, 23 February 2015 Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2013-22, Annex A to Procedural Order No. 1 (Revised), 14 May 2015 Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2013-22, Respondent Counter-Memorial, 20 January 2015 Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2013-22, Procedural Order No. 5, 23 May 2015 Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2013-22, Claimant Reply Memorial, 22 June 2015 Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2013-22, Press Release Regarding Live Streaming of Hearing Scheduled from 15 to 26 February 2016, 1 February 2016 Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2013-22, Press Release Regarding Live Streaming of Hearing Scheduled from 15 to 26 February 2016, 1 February 2016 [French] Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2013-22, Respondent Rejoinder Memorial, 6 November 2015 Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2013-22, United States Article 1128 Submission, 12 January 2016 Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2013-22, Transcript of Hearing - Day 1, 15 February 2016 Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2013-22, Transcript of Hearing - Day 2, 16 February 2016 Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2013-22, Transcript of Hearing - Day 3, 17 February 2016 Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2013-22, Transcript of Hearing - Day 4, 18 February 2016 Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2013-22, Transcript of Hearing - Day 5, 19 February 2016 Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2013-22, Transcript of Hearing - Day 6, 21 February 2016 Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2013-22, Transcript of Hearing - Day 7, 22 February 2016 Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2013-22, Transcript of Hearing - Day 8, 23 February 2016 Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2013-22, Transcript of Hearing - Day 9, 24 February 2016 Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2013-22, Transcript of Hearing - Day 10, 26 February 2016 Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2013-22, Claimant Reply to the Article 1128 Submissions of the United States and Mexico, 29 January 2016 Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2013-22, Government of Canada Reply to the Article 1128 Submissions of the United States and Mexico, 29 January 2016 Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2013-22, Claimant Costs Submissions, 11 April 2016 Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2013-22, Government of Canada Submission on Costs, 11 April 2016 Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2013-22, Government of Canada Reply to the Claimant Submission on Costs, 26 April 2016 Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2013-22, Claimant Reply Costs Submissions, 26 April 2016 Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2013-22, Award, 27 September 2016 Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2013-22, Mexico Article 1128 Submission, 12 January 2016 Windstream Energy LLC v. Government of Canada, PCA Case No. 2013-22, Revised Confidentiality Order, 2 October 2014", "field_61": "20121017 20130128 20130426 20130916 20131105 20131205 20140112 20140819 20150121 20150223 20150514 20150120 20150523 20150622 20160201 20151106 20160112 20160215 20160216 20160217 20160218 20160219 20160221 20160222 20160223 20160224 20160226 20160129 20160411 20160426 20160927 20141002", "field_62": "234 235", "Filename": "db://FE_SelectDisputeViewForContegraSearch#RowId=948", "field_102": "4471,4472,4849,5400,5403,5406,8042", "field_103": "1724,1724,1724,1724,1724,1724,1724", "field_104": "3269,4460,4473,4474,4475,5408,5412,8071,8151", "field_105": "900,900,900,900,900,900,900,900,900" }, "paragraphs": null, "hitCount": 0, "highlightedFields": null } ], "selectedNodes": null, "timeLog": [ "search: 53", "collect results (34): 4", "highlight fields: 0", "total: 58" ], "hardStop": false }