2021-05-27 - Weekly Tologix-DevIT-Industrial Meeting.mp4 (342 MB)

Hi Morgan ,

Jitesh and I just discussed, and we will organize a session with Rob and Radomir after our meeting next Thursday, once we better understand the application requirements. 

So no need for them to attend our June 3 session.

Thanks,
--Martin

Hi Melissa and Naomi ,

Following-up on above, I haven't been sent the wireframes to provide comments. Could you please send those to me today so that you can integrate that feedback into your user stories and updated wireframes?

Thanks,

Morgan

Hi Harsh , Jitesh and Akash ,

Could you please report back on the action item above.

Thanks,

Morgan

Hi Morgan , 

Here is the link to the wireframes: https://invis.io/4JTAJLMZ3HR. 

Thanks, 

Naomi

Thanks Naomi . I've inserted one comment into the wireframe but otherwise everything looks good. The only other outstanding issue that I need further confirmation on is the use of the term "paragraph" within ILG. This term has been carried over from ISLG, but it may not be appropriate in the context of agreements/contracts, rather than decision and awards. We may need to replace this term globally across the application with term like provision, clause or section.

I'll provide more details later today.

Morgan 

Hi Morgan , 

Thanks for reviewing and confirming. I have also responded to the comment in Invision. I will go ahead and start writing user stories for this and tag you to review. 

Thanks, 

Naomi

Hi Naomi and Jitesh ,

I've discussed this internally and the best term for us to use is "section" or "section(s)" when referring to any location with a document. This means that we'll need to replace the term "paragraph" or "paragraph(s)" with "section" or "section(s)" across the application. Also, I believe "section" or "section(s)" is being used in other context in the wireframes to refer to document details and project details:

image.png 147 KB • Download

We'll need to modify or remove this term from any existing copy across the application and ensure the term "section" or "section(s)" is reserved only to refer to locations within documents.

In addition, we'll need to modify the way "sections" are displayed in as pinpoint references. We'll need ensure "pa" is automatically removed from the display link and only the number is displayed:

image.png 143 KB • Download

Note this should be done globally within the application, both on the admin site and subscriber site.

Thanks,

Morgan

Hi Jitesh and Martin ,

I just thought of an issues that we should consider before we start working on altering the result view and document views. There is a strong possibility that we will launch ILG without a "Browse By Topic" feature and launch a more basic product that only has "Search by Keyword" and "Browse By Project" features. As a results, we will likely need to supress all features related to browsing by topic from the subscriber side of the application for a period of time:

image.png 160 KB • Download

In addition, when we eventually release this feature, we will likely limit access to certain tiers of subscriber. Ideally access to the relevant features would be controlled at the user and group level settings.

I raise this now, because I'm wondering if certain steps should be taken now to ensure there is this flexibility is the system before we start modifying searching features on the subscriber side of the application.

Thanks,

Morgan