‹ Home
Exported

TOLOGIX - ISLG App Rebuild

Laura Mindorff, COO at IndustrialHarsh Parikh, Tech Lead at DevITMelissa Cowell, General Manager at IndustrialHiren PatelMonica Martinez, MonolabMarysia RaptisPaul MoonIrit WeinfeldPatrick Harris, Web Designer at IndustrialPiyush Kanpariya, DevITRob Wiesenberg, ContegraRadomir Mladenovic, ContegraKetan Sondarva, Technical Project Manager at DevITStephanie Ducasse, Web Developer at IndustrialAkash Buch +16 others
Posted by Naomi Joanis ·

Discussion Related to FTS Filters

Hi Morgan Maguire, CEO Morgan , 

In our call this morning we discussed two items related to Full Text Search filters that we would like to have clarified/raise. 
  1. When users are filtering by document type, we currently have in the criteria, that arbitration rules can be filtered by values in the "Issuing Organization" field on the master list record that pull from the "Administering Institutions" Master list. (https://industrialagency.tpondemand.com/restui/board.aspx?#page=userstory/7691) We just would like to double check that this is correct? 
  2. There are technical issues blocking the ability for users to save their full text search parameters with all of the filters applied to the Research Notepad, and to be able to re-run these searches again in the future. (https://industrialagency.tpondemand.com/restui/board.aspx?#page=board/5596457270758793748&appConfig=eyJhY2lkIjoiNEIyRDU0NTZFNkFEOUY1MUQwQzA5QzI5QjBBNjM1OTMifQ==&boardPopup=userstory/13694) DevIT is looking into this at the moment, and will update us on the Industrial side, as solving this may possibly require changes to the FTS filter and FTS results page UI's.

Thanks, and if there are any changes that need to be made to the criteria regarding issue #1 I will adjust accordingly. 

Naomi 

Comments & Events

Morgan Maguire, CEO Morgan Maguire, CEO
Hi Naomi Joanis, UX Team Lead at Industrial Naomi ,

Here are my comments:
  1. When users are filtering by document type, we currently have in the criteria, that arbitration rules can be filtered by values in the "Issuing Organization" field on the master list record that pull from the "Administering Institutions" Master list. (https://industrialagency.tpondemand.com/restui/board.aspx?#page=userstory/7691) We just would like to double check that this is correct? 
    1. MDM: We want give the ability to filter Arbitration Rules by the Issuing Organization field:
      image.png 40.9 KB • Download
         
  2. There are technical issues blocking the ability for users to save their full text search parameters with all of the filters applied to the Research Notepad, and to be able to re-run these searches again in the future. (https://industrialagency.tpondemand.com/restui/board.aspx?#page=board/5596457270758793748&appConfig=eyJhY2lkIjoiNEIyRDU0NTZFNkFEOUY1MUQwQzA5QzI5QjBBNjM1OTMifQ==&boardPopup=userstory/13694) DevIT is looking into this at the moment, and will update us on the Industrial side, as solving this may possibly require changes to the FTS filter and FTS results page UI's.
    1. Ok, but this an important requirement.
Notified 5 people
Harsh Parikh, Tech Lead at DevIT Harsh Parikh, Tech Lead
Hi Morgan Maguire, CEO Morgan   and Naomi Joanis, UX Team Lead at Industrial Naomi ,

Does we need to check that Arbitration Rule is published or not for pulling Issuing Organization data ?

Does we need to pull Issuing Organization data only those arbitration rule which are published ?
Notified 5 people
Naomi Joanis, UX Team Lead at Industrial Naomi Joanis, UX Team Lead
Hi Harsh Parikh, Tech Lead at DevIT Harsh ,

Yes we should be checking for Issuing Organization data that is from published Arbitration Rules
Notified 5 people