Meta-field Management: User values from field functionality
I have reviewed the Dispute columns in the meta-data field map spreadsheet, and given what have already found, it looks as though this should be in place sooner rather than later. I have found these references for disputes in the spreadsheet:
- K-17 — Non-State Respondents: There is an ability to add multiple of these. This pulls from an existing entries for Non-State Respondent list; however, if there is not a match, the user can add text as new entry in Non-State Respondent list.
- K-68 — Non-disputing parties: There is an ability to add multiple of these. This pulls from an existing entries for Non-Disputing Parties and Claimants in the Dispute section; however, if there is not a match, the user can add a new entry to the Non-Disputing Parties list.
- K- 86, 90, 103, 106, 109, 112, 115, 140, 144, 147, 150, 153, 156, 159 etc — Relevant Document(s): Pulls entries from the Dispute Documents master list and only entries from the same Dispute.
- K-92 — Challenged Arbitrators: Pulls entries from the People master list that are selected under Tribunal, Annulment Committee, Tribunal (Rebumission) or Annulment Committee (Resubmission) above.
Please note in order to accommodate the first two points, we will have to adjust the criteria of the user story to include pulling values from specific field on all master list records of a certain type.
Mel
And yes, given the applicability to a wide range of fields, this make delivering this requirement more urgent.
Thanks,
Morgan
We will discuss this on Monday's call.