TOLOGIX - ISLG App Rebuild

Testing update

Hi Harsh Parikh, Tech Lead at DevIT Harsh and Jitesh Dhuravala, DevIT Jitesh  

I will be wrapping up testing on the Meta Field feature soon, but I noticed there are still some cards In Progress, most relating to the Field Set feature. Do you have an idea when these will be ready for UAT as well?

In addition, I've begun testing on Groups & Users, and I'm finding some cards are missing Acceptance Criteria in the application. Most notable is card https://industrialagency.tpondemand.com/entity/9092-users-greater-users-table in which I've highlighted the missing criteria. 

Could you please reiterate to the developers and QA to ensure each criterion is met prior to coming into UAT? The cards must be worked on using both the acceptance criteria and the wireframes.

Thanks!

Ryan

Comments & Events

Harsh Parikh, Tech Lead at DevIT
Hi Ryan Knuth, Customer Support Manager at Industrial Ryan ,

The FieldSet Feature will be uploaded today and you can check it in on People Master Page. The Parent Field Set concept are under process and it will be completed with Dispute Master. Hence, You can test the only Filed Set user story on people master list.

The above mentioned link' s acceptance criteria has been completed. You can check it on rebuild.islg. I have also informed to our QA and developers to reiterate all user stories of User and Group.
 
Ryan Knuth, Customer Support Manager at Industrial
Great, thanks for the update Harsh Parikh, Tech Lead at DevIT Harsh .

Ryan
Jitesh Dhuravala, DevIT
Hi Morgan Maguire, CEO Morgan and Ryan Knuth, Customer Support Manager at Industrial Ryan ,

I will be wrapping up testing on the Meta Field feature soon, but I noticed there are still some cards In Progress, most relating to the Field Set feature. Do you have an idea when these will be ready for UAT as well?

In Meta Field feature, there is one revised story updated for Document Type.
ref link https://industrialagency.tpondemand.com/RestUI/Board.aspx#page=board/5389754907359543952&appConfig=eyJhY2lkIjoiQ0E1NkJERUNFMTUyODhDNEFENEQwMkUyNDIxOTU0RjYifQ==&boardPopup=userstory/8763/silent

As per this revised story, we need to implement existing document type/content type link to new document type, previously we have implemented existing meta fields and map selected meta field to new dispute document type, now you are saying rather than particular meta fields admin can select existing dispute document type and mapped all meta field those are belongs to selected document type.

please take this changes into consideration, that's why you are finding some cards are in process. once it will complete, I will let you know.



Thanks,
Jitesh