Hi Harsh:

I am having trouble with how entry below is displayed on the live site (from IC/0300/01).

https://www.investorstatelawguide.com/CoreComponents/JurisprudenceReferredTo?docId=9209&Add=True

image.png 9.41 KB • Download

image.png 65 KB • Download

image.png 71.5 KB • Download

As you see, instead of showing up as "Paragraph 1008" and "Paragraph 1022," they show up as highlighted above. Paragraph 318 appears fine. When I tried adding a reference to "Paragraph 1000," it appears fine.

I checked another 4-digit reference that is displayed correctly (Paragraph 1223 above)
https://www.investorstatelawguide.com/CoreComponents/JurisprudenceReferredTo?docid=5144

image.png 28.1 KB • Download

image.png 61.4 KB • Download

I suspect that it might have something to do with "1000s."

Thanks,

Paul

Hi Paul , Morgan and Ryan ,

The above paragraph number display issue has resolved. There was minor SQL query bug. Hence, we have resolved the issue on both dev.islg and www.islg. The paragraph numbers are displaying now on www.islg.

Please check and confirm.

Thank you, Harsh . Looks good for me on www.islg. Paul please confirm from your end.

Thanks!

Ryan

Thank you, Harsh and Ryan. It looks good now. 

Paul

Hi Harsh and Ryan:

I am reopening this item, since I discovered another document with this issue.

IC/0028/03 JP citator opens as shown below. There are two references: Part II, Chapter I, Paragraph 54 and Part II, Chapter I, Paragraph 55. They are entered as UN/0015/03's short codes (https://www.investorstatelawguide.com/CoreComponents/AddDocumentStep1?docId=246) due to its unusual paragraph numbers.
https://www.investorstatelawguide.com/CoreComponents/JurisprudenceReferredTo?docId=433&group_source_id=84285

image.png 108 KB • Download

The two references highlighted above are displayed on the live site as captured below
https://www.investorstatelawguide.com/ResearchTools/JurisprudenceCitators?id=11&type=&disputeID=525253&cidsp=525253&sort=#525253

image.png 77.1 KB • Download

Note that paragraph 54 appears as it should, but paragraph 55 isn't.

The same is the case for IC/0046/02. 
https://www.investorstatelawguide.com/CoreComponents/JurisprudenceReferredTo?docid=1028

image.png 20.1 KB • Download

Part IV, Chapter D, Paragraph 35 and Part IV, Chapter D, Paragraph 37 appear as shown below
https://www.investorstatelawguide.com/ResearchTools/JurisprudenceCitators?id=11&type=&disputeID=525253&cidsp=525253&sort=#525253

image.png 78.6 KB • Download

Paragraph 35 appears fine, but paragraph 37 isn't.

Thanks,

Paul

Please also note UN/0103/01 "III/B,pa15" suffers from the same issue described above.

Hi Paul , Morgan and Ryan ,

We have found that the tab keyword was added into after manual destination code. Therefore, The paragraph numbers are not displayed on live site.

We have resolved the issue from all the data and also we changed the query to ensured that this kind of issue will not occur in future.

We have done this change on both dev.islg and www.islg.

Please check and confirm.

Thank you, Harsh . Looks good to me on www.islg.

Ryan

Hi Harsh and Ryan:

It looks good now. 

Another related issue is the order in which references are displayed on the live site. As captured below, two references should appear next to each other (in sequential order), but one appears at the top and another in the middle. Also, there is no real "order" at the moment. 

image.png 93.7 KB • Download

Ideally, I want the display to be arranged in the following order:
1. Part (I, II, III, IV, V)
2. Chaprter (if any - e.g., Part V does not have chapters) in numeric or alphabetical order (some parts use Roman numerals and some parts use alphabet)
3. Paragraph number.

I understand this is a tricky document with unusual paragraph numbers. Could you fix it?

Thanks,

Paul

Hi Harsh ,

Don't worry too much about the paragraph ordering as long as it's consistent. I understand it will be difficult to customize ordering for each document when the ordering rules are applied across the system.

Thanks,

Morgan 

OK Thanks Morgan .

Hi Harsh  

Do you have an update on this task?

Thanks!

Ryan

Hi Ryan ,

We haven't start work on ordering issue. We will let you know once will start work on this.

Hi Morgan and Ryan ,

We have looked into above ordering issue but  We need to create different kind of cases for each document scenarios. For each new document we need to build custom ordering and technically it is not feasible to manage whole things through SQL query.

Please suggest.

Hi Harsh ,

Understood. I don't want to go down the road of manually changing the order for each document. The ordering is at least consistent now, so I'll mark this to do complete.  

Thanks,

Morgan