✔ Discrepancy on Staging Live Site When not Indicating whether Arbitrators are Appointed by Claimant or Respondent
Completed by Morgan M.
- Assigned to
-
Harsh P.
- Notes
-
Hi
Morgan
I added Tribunal for LC/0002 on the staging admin site. I noticed that when I do not indicate whether the arbitrator is appointed by the claimant or respondent (which is not a hard coded field on staging admin site), the system assigns appointed by claimant/respondent by default when it shows up on staging live site. This is how they appear under "Proceeding Details" on the staging live site:
However, under "All Dispute Details", there is no such issue i.e it only indicates the "arbitrator" without indicating whether claimant or respondent appointed the arbitrator:
As there might be cases in which we may not be able to confirm which party appointed the arbitrator(s), I think it's necessary to resolve this issue.
Thanks,
Nafiseh
The issue above is related to my unanswered question here: Re: No tribunal information in Dispute tab of Dispute Document card - TOLOGIX - ISLG App Rebuild. How are we generating these acronyms? Could you please provide more details on the logic that causes an acronym to be assigned to person? Also, could you please direct me to the table in the database that is associating the acronyms with the "Appointed By" field?
Thanks,
Morgan
As discussed with Melisa in yesterday call, We are displaying Meta Field name in bracket in place of ( (P), (C), (R), (AC), (AR)) as per following screenshot.
Hope this fine.
I've inserted some comments into the relevant user story with my concerns on the sample above. My largest concern is that we're not providing any "Appointed By" details. Let's discuss during Thursday's call.
Thanks,
Morgan
This change has been done on staging.islg as per above screenshot We have also set space after the name.
Please check and confirm.
I checked the example in my previous comments i.e. LC/0002 on staging.islg, and it looks good to me:
Screen capture of staging live site:
Thanks,
Nafiseh
Morgan