✔ Duplicate Paragraph Numbers Appearing under Analysis List
Completed by Paul M.
- Assigned to
-
Harsh P.
- Notes
-
While reviewing Terms and Phrases under IC/0499/13, I noticed that duplicate paragraph numbers appear in Analysis List:
I checked the tags in the HTML, and there were no duplicate entries. In order to make sure, I deleted all Terms and Phrases entries and added them again in the HTML, but the issue was not resolved.
I also checked the relevant Terms and Phrases under Master Tree and Reports and I did not find any duplicates. Here are two examples:
Screen capture of the Term "incidental" in the HTML of IC/0499/13 (paragraph 148):
Screen capture of the Term "incidental" under Master Tree and Reports:
Screen capture of the Term "additional" in the HTML of IC/0499/13 (paragraph 148):Screen capture of the Term "additional" under Master Tree and Reports:
I've added this to-do to the priority list as #28. Note I didn't put this as a high priority, because it appears the issue is just isolated to the Analysis List, and the data appears to be displaying correctly when it is published in the Master Tree (and then ultimately on the Subscriber side). If that's not the case, and the priority needs to be elevated, please let me know.
Thanks,
Morgan
Paul just published the data capture and I was able to check the entries on the live site. There are no duplicate paragraph numbers under Terms and Phrases on the live site. As you mentioned, the issue is just isolated to the Analysis List, so the priority for this to-do does not need to be elevated.
Nafiseh
This issue is resolved on app.islg. Please check and confirm.
I checked the analysis list for IC/0499/13 on app.islg. The issue is resolved. I'll mark this to-do as complete.
Thanks,
Nafiseh
I re-opened this to-do.
IC/0499/13 has duplicate paragraph numbers that appear in the SN Analysis List:
These duplicate paragraph numbers also appear on app.islg live site, SN:
Thank you,
Irit
cc
This issue is resolved on app.islg. Please check and confirm.
What was the root cause of this issue?
Thanks,
-Martin
Thanks,
Irit
Please respond to Martin's question re: root cause before I can mark it complete, thanks.
Paul
I have already discussed with Martin that some entries we missed to remove now all things are done for SN tagging data.
Cc :