Hi Nafiseh ​,

Could you check to see what the source data in the Article Citator Master says about this issue? I want to confirm whether there is a broader migration issue here before I report the issue to Harsh.

Thanks,

Morgan

Hi Morgan ,

I checked Article citator master (dated 3 Dec 2020). There is no duplicate entry. I checked the historical data in other UINs where there is more than one entry under historical data for Arbitrator (president), Arbitrator appointed by claimant and Arbitrator appointed by respondent. This was the only example of a duplicate.

While checking other entries, I realized that when there is more than one historical data entry under Arbitrator (president), Arbitrator appointed by claimant and Arbitrator appointed by respondent, the system lists both the start date and effective date of change for the most recent historical data (so what I raised earlier in my previous comment should not be an issue). 

However, the way the name of the arbitrator and effective date of change is displayed on the live site is not consistent. Here are some examples:

IC/0164- Screen capture of staging.islg live site:

image.png 92.2 KB • Download

IC/0165- Screen capture of staging.islg live site:

image.png 99.5 KB • Download

IC/0418 - Screen capture of staging.islg live site:

image.png 118 KB • Download

SC/0033- Screen capture of staging.islg live site:

image.png 43 KB • Download

The issue with UN/0072 seems to be a one-off issue, but as for the ordering of the name(s) of the arbitrator(s) and effective date of change, I think this is something we need to consider as a broader issue. Do you want me to ask Harsh to fix UN/0072 separately as we occasionally ask him to fix historical data (as we are not able to do it ourselves), and create a separate to-do for the ordering of name(s) of the arbitrator(s) and effective date of change?

Please let me know.

Thanks,

Nafiseh

Ok. Thanks Nafiseh . I think I understand the problem here. The wrong field is getting displayed for "Effective: [DATE]" next to the current arbitrator. Rather that display the start date for the current arbitrator, it is displaying the start date for the previous arbitrator:

image.png 153 KB • Download

image.png 156 KB • Download

I'll report this and get this changed in the application.

On the other hand any inaccuracies in the historical data will need to manual altered by DevIT, so could you please create a new to-do that outlines precisely what changes in the data that need to be made on app.islg.

Thanks,

Morgan

Note I'm going to complete this to-do, because we'll be resolving these issue through separate to-do's.

Thanks,

Morgan

Thank you, Morgan .

As for the inaccuracies in the historical data that will need to be manually altered by DevIT, I'll create a new to-do that outlines what changes in the data need to be made on app.islg. Can I assign the to-do directly to Harsh?

As for the other issue i.e. the order in which the Previous Arbitrator and Effective date of change are displayed, can I go ahead and create a separate to-to? Here are examples of inconsistency as outlined above:

SC/0033:

image.png 43.7 KB • Download

IC/0164:

image.png 88.7 KB • Download

Thanks,

Nafiseh

Hi Nafiseh ,

Yes, please post the to-do under ISLG Migration Feedback - TOLOGIX - ISLG App Rebuild.

Calling you on Zoom about the ordering issues.

Morgan