‹ Home
Exported

TOLOGIX - ISLG App Rebuild

Laura Mindorff, COO at IndustrialHarsh Parikh, Tech Lead at DevITMelissa Cowell, General Manager at IndustrialHiren PatelMonica Martinez, MonolabMarysia RaptisPaul MoonIrit WeinfeldPatrick Harris, Web Designer at IndustrialPiyush Kanpariya, DevITRob Wiesenberg, ContegraRadomir Mladenovic, ContegraKetan Sondarva, Technical Project Manager at DevITStephanie Ducasse, Web Developer at IndustrialAkash Buch +16 others
From the list: ISLG Internal Content To-dos

✔ Fields to suppress on live site

Paul M. added this on
Completed by Morgan M.
Assigned to
Morgan Maguire, CEO Morgan M. Paul Moon Paul M.
Due on
Notes
The following are fields in the master list that need to be suppressed from the Subscriber site before launch.

Treaties
  •  Date of Conclusion / Signature 
  •  Date of Entry into Force 
Disputes 
  • Status
  • Subject
  • Economic Sector
  • Appointing Authority
  • Parties - Non-Disputing Parties
  • Place of Arbitration - Place of Arbitration: Province/State
  • Experts
  • Tribunal - Tribunal Secretary
  • Legal Analytic Details - Procedure - Bifurcation - Bifurcation Request - DO NOT USE 
  • Legal Analytic Details - Procedure - Bifurcation - Bifurcation by Parties' Agreement - DO NOT USE  
  • Legal Analytic Details - Procedure - Bifurcation - Unspecified Bifurcation - DO NOT USE 
  • Legal Analytic Details - Procedure - Arbitrator(s) Challenges -  Arbitrator Challenge Decision - DO NOT USE 
  • Legal Analytic Details - Procedure - Arbitrator(s) Challenges -  Arbitrator Challenge Decision - DO NOT USE - Arbitrator Challenge Decision(s) Maker(s) - DO NOT USE 
  • Legal Analytic Details - Procedure - Arbitrator(s) Challenges -  Arbitrator Challenge Decision - DO NOT USE -  Relevant Document(s) - DO NOT USE 
  • Legal Analytic Details - Procedure - Arbitrator(s) Challenges -  Arbitrator Challenge Decision - DO NOT USE -  Relevant Document(s) - DO NOT USE -  Location in Relevant Document(s) 
  • Legal Analytic Details - Procedure - Non-Disputing Party Submission - Non-Disputing Party Submission -  Non-Disputing Party Submission Application Result - DO NOT USE 
  • Legal Analytic Details - Procedure - Non-Disputing Party Submission - Non-Disputing Party Submission -  Non-Disputing Party Submission Application Result - DO NOT USE -  Relevant Decision(s) - DO NOT USE 
  • Legal Analytic Details - Procedure - Non-Disputing Party Submission - Non-Disputing Party Submission -  Non-Disputing Party Submission Application Result - DO NOT USE -  Relevant Decision(s) - DO NOT USE -  Location in Relevant Document(s) - DO NOT USE 
  • Legal Analytic Details - Jurisdiction and Admissibility -  Objection to Jurisdiction: other - Do Not Use  
  • Legal Analytic Details - Jurisdiction and Admissibility -  Objection to Jurisdiction: other - Do Not Use -  Jurisdiction: other Outcome - Do Not Use 
  • Legal Analytic Details - Jurisdiction and Admissibility -  Objection to Jurisdiction: other - Do Not Use -  Jurisdiction: other Outcome - Do Not Use -  Relevant Document(s) - Do Not Use 
  • Legal Analytic Details - Jurisdiction and Admissibility -  Objection to Jurisdiction: other - Do Not Use -  Jurisdiction: other Outcome - Do Not Use -  Relevant Document(s) - Do Not Use -  Location in Relevant Document(s) - Do Not Use 

Dispute Documents
  • Proceeding Stage
  • Separate Opinion (on internal to-do list already)

Comments & Events

Paul Moon Paul Moon
Treaties & Rules
  •  Date of Conclusion / Signature 
  •  Date of Entry into Force 

Disputes 
  • Status
  • Subject
  • Economic Sector
  • Appointing Authority
  • Parties - Non-Disputing Parties
  • Place of Arbitration - Place of Arbitration: Province/State
  • Experts
  • Tribunal - Tribunal Secretary
  • Legal Analytic Details - Procedure - Bifurcation - Bifurcation Request - DO NOT USE 
  • Legal Analytic Details - Procedure - Bifurcation - Bifurcation by Parties' Agreement - DO NOT USE  
  • Legal Analytic Details - Procedure - Bifurcation - Unspecified Bifurcation - DO NOT USE 
  • Legal Analytic Details - Procedure - Counsel/Expert(s) Challenges
  • Legal Analytic Details - Procedure - Non-Disputing Party Submission - Non-Disputing Party Submission -  Non-Disputing Party Submission Application Result - DO NOT USE 
  • Legal Analytic Details - Procedure - Non-Disputing Party Submission - Non-Disputing Party Submission -  Non-Disputing Party Submission Application Result - DO NOT USE -  Relevant Decision(s) - DO NOT USE 
  • Legal Analytic Details - Jurisdiction and Admissibility -  Objection to Jurisdiction: other - Do Not Use 
Dispute Documents
  • Proceeding Stage
  • Separate Opinion (on internal to-do list already)
Notified 4 people
Morgan Maguire, CEO Morgan Maguire, CEO
Thanks Paul Moon Paul . A couple of questions in red text for some of the fields listed above:

Treaties & Rules
  • Don't we have this information for some BITs? Are suggesting we wait to present this information until we have collected across all treaties?
    • Date of Conclusion / Signature 
    •  Date of Entry into Force 

Disputes 
  • Place of Arbitration - Place of Arbitration: Province/State
    • Haven't we collected this information as part of our data capture process? Why wouldn't we display it?
  • Legal Analytic Details - Procedure - Counsel/Expert(s) Challenges
    • Why aren't we displaying this information? Didn't we capture this data?
Thanks,

Morgan
Notified 4 people
Paul Moon Paul Moon
Hi Morgan Maguire, CEO Morgan :
  • Treaties: I shouldn't have included "Rules" on my list above (crossed out now) since all Arbitration Rules are showing those dates correctly. Since "Treaties" and "Arbitration Rules" are two different Master Lists on the rebuild admin site, my comment above applies only to "Treaties." We specify the date of conclusion and the date of entry into force in XML placeholders for BITs and FTAs, but we never captured that information anywhere else especially when we XMLed an instrument. I do not see any dates for BITs on rebuild.live.
  • Place of Arbitration - Place of Arbitration: Province/State: we didn't capture Province/State other than "Washington, D.C." We have been capturing "Vancouver, Canada" and "Toronto, Canada" without "BC" or "ON."
  • Legal Analytics Details - Procedure - Counsel/Expert(s) Challenges: as of now, it is incomplete at best, since experts, unless a legal expert who appeared as counsel/tribunal member elsewhere already, couldn't be entered under this section because no expert is on "People" list currently. I had to advise analysts to skip entering damages expert challenges a few times. We would have counsel challenge information, if any but very rare, so we may want to consider deleting "Expert(s)" from the section title if you want to display any information currently entered. 
Thanks,

Paul
Notified 4 people
Morgan Maguire, CEO Morgan Maguire, CEO
Hi Paul,

Understood. I guess the first two points will be projects to complete post-launch.

Re Counsel/Expect Challenges, if you're confident that we've covered all the counsel challenges, would you feel comfortable if we changed the field to "Counsel Challenges"?

Thanks,

Morgan
Notified 4 people
Paul Moon Paul Moon
Hi Morgan Maguire, CEO Morgan :

Yes, I would feel comfortable changing that section to "Counsel Challenges."  One question: once we eventually capture expert challenges, would we need to create another section or would we be able to simply change the section back to "Counsel/Expert(s) Challenges"?

Thanks,

Paul
Notified 4 people
Morgan Maguire, CEO Morgan Maguire, CEO
Hi Paul Moon Paul ,

Ok. Sounds good. I've made the changes on rebuild.investorstatelawguide.com.

We could that if it makes more sense to treat these as separate fields.

Morgan
Notified 4 people
Morgan Maguire rescheduled this to-do
Was
Now
Notified 1 person
Morgan Maguire, CEO
Morgan Maguire completed this to-do.