✔ Irrelevant Info Appearing under Document Details on Staging Subscriber Site
Completed by Morgan M.
- Assigned to
-
Harsh P.
Melissa C.
Naomi J.
- Notes
-
Hi
Morgan
Under UN/0290/01 (Iberdrola Energia S.A. v. Republic of Guatemala II, PCA Case No. 2017-41, Final Award, 24 August 2020), there is a piece of data on the staging subscriber site that I cannot figure out where it comes from, and it does not make sense to me (you can see highlighted in the screen capture below). Could we investigate why it appears under "Dispute Details" when "all document details" of UN/0290/01 is collapsed?
Thanks,
Nafiseh
Further to the issue reported by
Also, the requirements in the user story above specify that only fields with data inputted into them should be displaying on the Subscriber side:
This doesn't seem to be occurring in Dispute view and Dispute Document view. Could you confirm whether there has been a change in the requirement, or if we have another regression issue on our hands.
Thanks,
Morgan
The "By Decision/Party Agreement" seems to be a remnant from the meta data field map spreadsheet, and the fields we originally thought should be hardcoded to always display in the dispute details section. As requirements changed over time I think this simply wasn't removed. I think the "AF/0001/03" was hardcoded there based on the mockups: https://invis.io/JET7XMPSQFW#/412314466_Dispute_Details.
This was missed during UAT, I've logged a bug for this here and moved it to 'planned':https://industrialagency.tpondemand.com/entity/21475-all-details-greater-by-decisionparty-agreement
In regards to displaying only fields with data in them, there are some technical difficulties to do so with this data, therefore sometimes field labels will be visible without a value in them, or with a dash in them.
Thanks,
Morgan
This issue is resolved on both rebuild.islg and staging.islg.
Confirmed resolved on staging.
https://industrialagency.tpondemand.com/entity/21475-all-details-greater-by-decisionparty-agreement
Morgan