✔ Issues with display of custom paragraph document (AF/0022/01)
Completed by Irit W.
- Assigned to
-
Harsh P.
- Due on
- Notes
-
Dispute Document AF/0022/01 PDF had unique paragraph numbers and as a result were supposed to be coded with paragraph tags that matched the codes used within the legacy site.
Paragraph 12-50, the paragraph tag produced within the manually coded HTML document is entered as "AF002201_partXII.pa50".
Here is how paragraph 12-50 appears in the Analysis list (and live site). Using IC/0460/01 as an example. Jurispurdence Citator list referring to AF/0022/01:
rtXII.50
We want it to appear on the admin site and live site as "12050", not "rtXII.50"
Please see app.islg live site, Research Tools, Jurisprudene Citator AF/0022/01 Gemplus, S.A., SLP, S.A. and Gemplus Industrial, S.A. de C.V. v. United Mexican States, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/04/3 & ARB(AF)/04/4, Award, 16 June 2010
The entries for AF/0022/01 have a discrepancy.
Is there a reason Paragraph "12-50" and Paragraph "13-99" appear differently than the rest?
Please note that any migrated Analysis tag data was entered as the entries you see listed in Column B below:
You may recall the custom paragraph spreadsheet with the analysis data for AF/0022/01
CustomParagrph (1).xlsx
The last image is not loaded. Could you please provide update image of provide small video to understand this bug that what you require ?
To put it more simply, we want references to paragraph "12-50" and paragraph "13-99" to appear on the app.islg admin site and live site as:
"12050", not "rtXII.50"
"13099", not "rtXIII.99"
We need this complete by Friday June 18th. Are you able to meet this due date? Please let us know if this will be an issue.
Thank you,
Irit
We done this task on app.islg. Please check and confirm.
I see that the issue for paragraph "12-50" and paragraph "13-99" appear correctly on app.islg Admin and Live Site now.
However, the paragraph tag issue has not been resolved.
Please see app.islg live site, Research Tools, Jurisprudene Citator AF/0022/01 Gemplus, S.A., SLP, S.A. and Gemplus Industrial, S.A. de C.V. v. United Mexican States, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/04/3 & ARB(AF)/04/4, Award, 16 June 2010
The entries referring to AF/0022/01 have a new discrepancy. This entry was recently added. See yellow highlight. Paragraph "12-57" appears differently than the rest. We want it to appear as "12057", not "rtXII.57".
Paragraph "12-57" reference comes from the Jurisprudence Citator data capture in Dispute Document OT/0042/02. When I go to OT/0042/02 draft version on app.islg and Analyze data capture, the drop down menu for AF/0022/01 still lists the paragraphs with the following paragraph tags:
The tags are still wrong in the HTML for AF/0022/01, which means we will continue to have this issue.
I believe the only solution is to code paragraph tags that match the codes used within the legacy site.
Thank you,
Irit
There is a new paragraph id tag issue for AF/0022/01, specifically paragraph id tag for Part XII Paragraph 58 ("12-58").
When I check the paragraph id tag for Part XII Paragraph 58 ("12-58") HTML on app.islg I see: AF002201_partXII.pa58
There is an issue with how this paragraph id tag appears in the Analysis List and Live Site.
For example,
Please see app.islg live site, Research Tools, Jurisprudene Citator AF/0022/01 Gemplus, S.A., SLP, S.A. and Gemplus Industrial, S.A. de C.V. v. United Mexican States, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/04/3 & ARB(AF)/04/4, Award, 16 June 2010
The entries referring to AF/0022/01 have a new discrepancy. See yellow highlight. Part XII Paragraph 58 ("12-58") appears differently than the rest. We want it to appear as "12058", not "rtXII.58".
PartXII Paragraph 58 ("12-58") reference comes from the Jurisprudence Citator data capture in Dispute Document IC/0301/14. When I go to IC/0301/14 draft version on app.islg and Analyze data capture, the drop down menu for AF/0022/01 still lists the paragraphs with the following paragraph tags:
Meaning, I cannot find paragraph id tag "AF002201_partXII.pa58" in the drop down menu.
Here is how that tag appears in the IC/0301/14 Jurisprudence Citator Analysis List:
Thank you,
Irit
cc
This issue is resolved on app.islg. Please check and confirm.
I see that the entry "rtXII.58" has been replaced with "12058" in the Jurisprudence Citator data capture in Dispute Document IC/0301/14 (app.islg Published version) and on app.islg live site.
Thank you,
Irit
Could you make the same corrections to paragraph id tag issue for AF/0022/01, specifically paragraph id tag for:
Part XI Paragraph 12 ("11-12" in the PDF)
Part XII Paragraph 56 ("12-56" in the PDF)
Part XII Paragraph 57 ("12-57" in the PDF)
Part XIII Paragraph 80 ("13-80" in the PDF)
Part XIII Paragraph 81 ("13-81" in the PDF)
There is the same issue with how these paragraph id tags appears in the Analysis List on app.islg and how they appear on app.islg Live Site.
For example,
Please see app.islg live site, Research Tools, Jurisprudene Citator AF/0022/01 Gemplus, S.A., SLP, S.A. and Gemplus Industrial, S.A. de C.V. v. United Mexican States, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/04/3 & ARB(AF)/04/4, Award, 16 June 2010
See yellow highlight. They appear differently than the other entries. We want them to appear as follows:
"11012", not "rtXI.12"
"12056", not "rtXII.56"
"12057", not "rtXII.57"
"13080", not "rtXIII.80"
"13081", not "rtXIII.81"
Part XI Paragraph 12 ("11-12"), Part XII Paragraph 56 ("12-56"), Part XIII Paragraph 80 ("13-80") and Part XIII Paragraph 81 ("13-81") reference comes from the Jurisprudence Citator data capture in Dispute Document IC/0398/01. See IC/0398/01 Jurisprudence Citator Analysis List on app.islg:
Part XII Paragraph 57 ("12-57") reference comes from the Jurisprudence Citator data capture in Dispute Document OT/0042/02. See OT/0042/02 Jurisprudence Citator Analysis List on app.islg:
Thank you,
Irit
cc
We have modified above mentioned Paragraph Ids on app.islg. Please check and confirm.
I see that the entries appear as requested in the Jurisprudence Citator data capture on app.islg admin site and on app.islg live site.
Thank you,
Irit
Does this mean we can complete this to-do?
Thanks,
Morgan
I will mark this to-do complete.
Irit