The two documents used in the video are IC/0418/01 SolEs v. Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/38, Award, 31 July 2019 and UN/0121/05 - PV Investors v. Spain Concurring and Dissenting Opinion of Charles N. Brower - 28 February 2020.

1. Paragraph references are displayed in a lexical order, not numerical.
2. Certain paragraphs are repeated similar to Article Citator All References repeating excerpt paragraphs - TOLOGIX - ISLG App Rebuild.

Jurisprudence Citator paragrpah references repeated and lexical order (20-Jan-21).mp4 3.75 MB • Download

Hi Paul and Morgan ,

The first issue is not possible to set as numeric order as the so many migrated data as contain character value as well (ex, 11a, 11a), 11.a etc..)

The second issue is same as which I mentioned in this thread (Duplicate References in Jurisprudence Citator on the Rebuild Live Site - TOLOGIX - ISLG App Rebuild)

Hi Harsh , 

Regarding the first issue, we need to come up with a system generated order for paragraph references across the various tools. Would it be possible to make the order based on the order the paragraph or footnote appears in the HTML?

Regarding the second issue, I guess I was wrong in my comments here: Re: Duplicate References in Jurisprudence Citator on the Rebuild Live Site - TOLOGIX - ISLG App Rebuild in assuming that this issue didn't affect the Article Citator data, because it looks like it has. We'll have to examine this on Thursday and come up with a solution to this data problem.

Thanks,

Morgan

Hi Morgan ,

In this task, I have added comment in wrong thread. Please see my comment below for this thread.

We did ordering of paragraph tagging number by html structure wise. But, some HTMLs are pending (In Queue) so the ordering is not set for those document cards. once we will integrate HTMLs in application then Paragraph tagging ordering will be set automatically by html structure wise.

Ho Paul and Irit ,

Continuing with the discussion here that was happening in the wrong thread: Re: Jurisprudence Citator paragraph references appear out of order - TOLOGIX - ISLG App Rebuild, let's ensure we discuss how to test this issue during our team meeting on Wednesday.

Thanks,

Morgan

Hi Morgan , I edited my response.

Hi  Harsh  
Please see Paul's response below.

Hi Irit ,

I think your comment above is focusing on the wrong issue. We're focused on the order of the pinpoint references in this to-do, not the order of the specific references, that was dealt with in a different to-do.

Paul , can you please sort this out.

Morgan 

Hi Morgan :

Below is what Harsh posted in the other thread by mistake. The square marked paragraph in the second capture below is relevant to this thread.

image.png 14 KB • Download

image.png 18.9 KB • Download

Based on what Harsh described, if a dispute document has HTML uploaded, it shouldn't be showing up in lexical order but in HTML order. IC/0418/01 as an example still has the same problem described in the original video as shown below on both app.islg and staging.islg.

image.png 67.7 KB • Download

Uploading a new HTML may address this issue if a dispute document didn't already have HTML uploaded, but this potential solution doesn't address the issue where dispute documents already have HTML uploaded like IC/0418/01. 

Thanks,

Paul

Right Paul ​, but Irit ​ is referring above to the order of paragraphs in specific references, which is a different issue.

I'm going to step away from this and let, you, Harsh ​ and Irit ​ sort this out.

Morgan

Ok. Thanks Irit ​ and Paul ​.

Harsh ​, please refer to Paul ​ comment above. The document has an HTML but the pinpoint references are not appearing in the order they appear in the HTML as you've stated they should be. Could you please investigate and resolve.

Thanks,

Morgan

Hi Morgan and Paul ,

We checked above Screenshot and found that both Documents have pending html. That's why the Action menu is disable. Please check the Paragraph References which Document have Html File. 

Above both document which you highlighted in screenshot haven't html file.

Hi Harsh

IC/0418/01 SolEs v. Spain, ICSID Case No. ARB/15/38, Award, 31 July 2019 has the HTML file on app.islg:

image.png 67.3 KB • Download

Hi Irit ,

This is the Source File. But the References are available in following 2 PDF file where HTML are still pending.

The UIN of the Referencing Document are :
UN/0121/04
UN/0121/05

The Ordering is generating as per above UIN's Html which is currently Pending.

image.png 172 KB • Download

Hi Irit ​,

IC/0418/01 is the referenced document, not the documents Paul ​ has highlighted above that contain the references. As Harsh ​ has correctly pointed out, the PV Investors v. Kingdom of Spain documents do not HTMLs, hence, the pinpoint references to do not appear in the correct order.

Harsh ​ has stated that when these HTMLs are uploaded, the pinpoint references with appear in the order that they appear in HTML. We need to perform a test that confirms this.

Thanks,

Morgan

Thank you Harsh and Morgan ,

I'm sorry about that.  I now understand that you meant the HTML of the documents referring to IC/0418/01.

Irit

Hi Irit and Paul ,

Just a reminder that we need to perform a test to confirm that adding the HTML to a dispute document will resolve the ordering issue above. My suggestion is that you record the UINs of a few documents that have completed HTMLs pending upload to the new application and are experiencing the ordering issue above, and then examine them again when their HTMLs are uploaded to the system.

Thanks,

Morgan

Hi Morgan :

Irit will identify three documents and see if uploading the HTML makes any difference or not.

Thanks,

Paul

Hi Irit and Paul ,

Now that the recent batch of HTML documents has been added to app.islg, could you please confirm whether the ordering issue above is now resolved for documents within batch 1.

Thanks,

Morgan 

Ok, Morgan .

Irit , please pick three dispute documents from batch 1 and check JP citator of the dispute documents that predate the three documents you'll choose (you're not checking JP citator of the three dispute documents). You will be able to identify which JP citator to check by going into analysis list.

Thanks,

Paul

Hi Morgan and Paul ,

This issue has been fixed.

I checked the following UINs:

UN/0127/29 Resolute Forest Products v. Canada - Decision on Jurisdiction and Admissibility (selected from the Analysis list from AF/0045/24, uploaded as part of Batch 1)

UN/0030/07 Chemtura v. Canada -  Award (selected from the Analysis list from IC/0068/03, uploaded as part of Batch 1)

IC/0418/01 SolEs v. Spain, Award  (selected from Analysis list from UN/0121/05, uploaded as part of Batch 1)

These examples previously had paragraph numbers that were not in numerical order.  Now that the Batch 1 HTMLs were added, they are displaying properly.

Thanks,
Irit

Perfect. Thanks Irit . Marking to-do complete.

Morgan