TOLOGIX - ISLG App Rebuild

Legal Analytics details not appearing on rebuild live under All Proceeding Details

Assigned to
Harsh Parikh, Tech Lead at DevIT Harsh P.

Comments & Events

Harsh Parikh, Tech Lead at DevIT
Hi Paul Moon Paul ,

The Legal Data for OT/0020 is already available. In above video, you were displaying the dispute detail of UIN IC/0460.

And we found that there is no legal data under UIN IC/0460. Hence, It was not display in above video.
Morgan Maguire, CEO
Look like this field was added, because of a bug posted on TargetProcess: https://industrialagency.tpondemand.com/RestUI/Board.aspx#page=board/5361190942734992086&appConfig=eyJhY2lkIjoiOTk1NDg2NkUwM0I1RTJGMzQ5NjgyOTdFRjk2NkRGN0YifQ==&searchPopup=bug/21268.

Melissa Cowell, General Manager at Industrial Melissa and Naomi Joanis, UX Team Lead at Industrial Naomi , why was the "Type of Court Decision/Judgment" added to the Dispute form? I don't think this field is relevant anymore after we removed Proceeding Stage as the primary method for organizing dispute documents.

Thanks,

Morgan
Harsh Parikh, Tech Lead at DevIT
Hi Melissa Cowell, General Manager at Industrial Melissa and Naomi Joanis, UX Team Lead at Industrial Naomi and Morgan Maguire, CEO Morgan ,

Please guide us what we need to do in this task as per story we remains Type of Court Decision/Judgment field in Dispute View.

Please let us know.
Morgan Maguire, CEO
Hi Melissa Cowell, General Manager at Industrial Melissa and Naomi Joanis, UX Team Lead at Industrial Naomi ,

Following-up on above, could you confirm what we should do about the "Type of Court Decision/Judgment". From our perspective, this field is not relevant to our data and should not have been added to the dispute form as hardcoded field, but I want to confirm that the field doesn't have a purpose that I'm not considering before we provide Harsh Parikh, Tech Lead at DevIT Harsh instructions to remove it.



Thanks,

Morgan
Naomi Joanis, UX Team Lead at Industrial
Hi Morgan Maguire, CEO Morgan

This field was meant to be used to populate data in the “By Decision/Party Agreement” field. Seeing as we have removed that field, this one no longer needs to be hard-coded as a meta field in disputes.
Morgan Maguire, CEO
OK. Sounds good. Thanks Naomi Joanis, UX Team Lead at Industrial Naomi .

Harsh Parikh, Tech Lead at DevIT Harsh , could you please remove the "Type of Court Decision/Judgment" field from the dispute form to resolve this to-do:
Thanks,

Morgan
Harsh Parikh, Tech Lead at DevIT
Hi Morgan Maguire, CEO Morgan and Naomi Joanis, UX Team Lead at Industrial Naomi ,

We have removed The Type of Court Decision/Judgment MetaField from both staging.islg and app.islg.

From Subscriber side, it will be not visible but subscriber side you will check after will deploy code on 28th Feb.
Morgan Maguire, CEO
Ok. Sounds good Harsh Parikh, Tech Lead at DevIT Harsh .

Paul Moon Paul , could you please test that this item is complete on the admin site and then perform a test on the subscriber site next Monday.

Thanks,

Morgan
Paul Moon
Ok, I'll test this next Monday. As far as I am aware, this problem does not show up on the subscriber site; let me know if you found it appearing on the subscriber site.

Thanks,

Paul
Paul Moon
Hi Harsh Parikh, Tech Lead at DevIT Harsh :

I confirm "Type of Court Decision/Judgment" that was appearing erroneously has been removed on both app.islg and staging.islg.

Thanks,

Paul
Paul Moon
Paul Moon completed this to-do.