Further to the video below, we need to make an adjustment in the way fields are presented within advanced filters (and other features where fields from the Dispute form are presented - e.g., ISLG Reports). Currently fields are presented in alphabetical order, but we need to change this so that the fields are presented in the order they appear within the Dispute form, along with context on whether the field is a parent/child to other fields.

Note this may cause an issue with the requirement to combine fields within the same field set that have the same field name and value list (e.g., "Arbitrator" and "Appointed By" fields within the Tribunal field set). However, perhaps this could be dealt with as follows:

In Dispute form on admin site, the fields in the Tribunal Field set as follows:

image.png 32.5 KB • Download

which could be presented as follows in the advanced filter:

The two instances of "Arbitrator" and "Appointed By" are combined and presented as single filter options. 

This would mean we would need to add an additional requirement to combining multiple fields into a single filter options:

The fourth condition is the new condition, but would apply to all the fields that are currently getting combined.

Problem with presentation of fields within advanced filters (6-Oct-20).mp4 5.73 MB • Download