TOLOGIX - ISLG App Rebuild

Problem with Separate Opinion fields in Dispute Documents

Assigned to
Melissa Cowell, General Manager at Industrial Melissa C. Naomi Joanis, UX Team Lead at Industrial Naomi J.
Notes
Further to the video below, there are few issues with the fields dealing with Separate Opinions:
  • "Separate Opinion" and "Associated Decision or Award" fields are pulling all Dispute Document records. They should only be pulling records from the same dispute (and if possible the same proceeding stage)
  • Due to limitations in the "Use values from existing fields" options, I am unable to setup the "Author of Separate Opinion" field in managed fields. We need this field to pull all the People records associated with data within the Tribunal, Annulment Committee, Tribunal (Resubmission) or Annulment Committee (Resubmission) field sets depending on what proceeding stage is selected above.
  • "Decision or Award associated with Separate Opinion" should be setup as a field with Separate Opinions, because it will only apply to documents that are Separate Opinions.

Comments & Events

Harsh Parikh, Tech Lead at DevIT
Hi Melissa Cowell, General Manager at Industrial Melissa ,

We need your input on this.
Morgan Maguire, CEO
Yes, this probably warrants a discussion during our call on Thursday. I'll add it to the agenda.

Morgan
Morgan Maguire, CEO
Hi Harsh Parikh, Tech Lead at DevIT Harsh and Melissa Cowell, General Manager at Industrial Melissa ,
 
Items #1 and #3 are now resolved in this to-do, but we still need to resolve #2, which requires some of the changes I outlined here: Re: Related documents from dispute - TOLOGIX - ISLG App Rebuild and here: Problem with presentation of options in "use value from existing field" - TOLOGIX - ISLG App Rebuild. I understand that the "+ add another" function may present some significant technical challenges, but could we implement the multi-select option in timeline fashion?

Create a multi-select option within the "Data/Values Field":


This would allow us to create value lists that contain values across multiple fields in a form, and would serve the purposes for the "Author of Separate Opinion" field, and other fields where we need to pull all People records associated with a dispute.

Thanks,

Morgan
Morgan Maguire, CEO
Hi Melissa Cowell, General Manager at Industrial Melissa and Harsh Parikh, Tech Lead at DevIT Harsh ,

Following up on my comment above concerning the multiple-select option in the Data/Value field, is it possible for us to implement this change? As I'm building the Legal Analytics fields, there are a number of fields where we need this feature. In particular, I need to build fields where the dropdown menu options are limited to only People master list entries associated with a Dispute.

Harsh Parikh, Tech Lead at DevIT Harsh , would it be technically difficult to implement this?

Thanks,

Morgan
Harsh Parikh, Tech Lead at DevIT
Yes Morgan Maguire, CEO Morgan . It is major change in Meta Field Page and also database level structure. Also, we need to check how this kind of data will be populated dynamically.
 
Harsh Parikh, Tech Lead at DevIT
Hi Melissa Cowell, General Manager at Industrial Melissa ,

I Know the story.. But, if we provide multiselect in data value then we create new mapping table to store multiple data value and also change in all master form rendering the pull the data by combined those values from new datable.

We also need to change in all master forms as well.
Morgan Maguire, CEO
Hi Harsh Parikh, Tech Lead at DevIT Harsh ,

Currently, we have the ability to setup a dropdown field that pulls values from multiple lists:


Wouldn't the process of combining values be very similar with the "Use values from existing fields"? 

Morgan
Harsh Parikh, Tech Lead at DevIT
No Morgan Maguire, CEO Morgan . The data value field under Use Value list is not same thing as Select Option field. 

We will also discuss this thing on Monday's call.
Morgan Maguire, CEO
Morgan Maguire completed this to-do.