✔ Problem with Separate Opinion fields in Dispute Documents
Completed by Morgan M.
- Assigned to
-
Melissa C.
Naomi J.
- Notes
-
Further to the video below, there are few issues with the fields dealing with Separate Opinions:
- "Separate Opinion" and "Associated Decision or Award" fields are pulling all Dispute Document records. They should only be pulling records from the same dispute (and if possible the same proceeding stage)
- Due to limitations in the "Use values from existing fields" options, I am unable to setup the "Author of Separate Opinion" field in managed fields. We need this field to pull all the People records associated with data within the Tribunal, Annulment Committee, Tribunal (Resubmission) or Annulment Committee (Resubmission) field sets depending on what proceeding stage is selected above.
- "Decision or Award associated with Separate Opinion" should be setup as a field with Separate Opinions, because it will only apply to documents that are Separate Opinions.
We need your input on this.
Morgan
Items #1 and #3 are now resolved in this to-do, but we still need to resolve #2, which requires some of the changes I outlined here: Re: Related documents from dispute - TOLOGIX - ISLG App Rebuild and here: Problem with presentation of options in "use value from existing field" - TOLOGIX - ISLG App Rebuild. I understand that the "+ add another" function may present some significant technical challenges, but could we implement the multi-select option in timeline fashion?
Create a multi-select option within the "Data/Values Field":
This would allow us to create value lists that contain values across multiple fields in a form, and would serve the purposes for the "Author of Separate Opinion" field, and other fields where we need to pull all People records associated with a dispute.
Thanks,
Morgan
Following up on my comment above concerning the multiple-select option in the Data/Value field, is it possible for us to implement this change? As I'm building the Legal Analytics fields, there are a number of fields where we need this feature. In particular, I need to build fields where the dropdown menu options are limited to only People master list entries associated with a Dispute.
Thanks,
Morgan
To clarify, most of this functionality is already in place based on this user story:
https://industrialagency.tpondemand.com/entity/11207-add-new-meta-field-greater-dropdownsearchable
The request above requires the 'Data values' field to be multi-select.
Also, please note that this functionality will be critical to the reporting feature.
Mel
I Know the story.. But, if we provide multiselect in data value then we create new mapping table to store multiple data value and also change in all master form rendering the pull the data by combined those values from new datable.
We also need to change in all master forms as well.
Currently, we have the ability to setup a dropdown field that pulls values from multiple lists:
Wouldn't the process of combining values be very similar with the "Use values from existing fields"?
Morgan
We will also discuss this thing on Monday's call.