Hi Morgan ,

The following issues we discovered and resolved.

1. Branches are not in the same order as the legacy application

  We have resolved this issue on rebuild.islg

2. Certain branches were not migrated correctly (e.g., entered as a cross reference rather than a document reference).

In old application they were maintained 2 table for Cross reference and Document References and both tables are associated with same ids but in new application we are maintaining only one table for all the branch types.

Hence, due to same Ids this issue is occurred. There is only 2 records have this kind of issue and we resolved it.

3. Loading times for opening certain branches is very slow.

We noticed that due to the column of Subsequent data, and the count on icon (above Document Title) and Paragraph no. is taking time to fetch the data.

SN_Migration.png 213 KB • Download

We have improved the query to fetch the count on icon and Paragraph number but still due to this count it will take some time to load.
 
Also, Currently we have removed the View all Subsequent column from Document card only from Subject navigator.

Now, the loading time is improved after remove the Subsequent column from card.

Ok. Thanks Harsh . It appears issue #1 and #2 are resolved. However, as we discussed during the call this morning, I've moved this to-do to: ISLG Feedback on Loading Issues - TOLOGIX - ISLG App Rebuild. The loading times for opening branches are still too slow across the entire tool on the Subscriber side. Even the first level branches are opening more slowly than the branches in the legacy app, which is unacceptable.

Regarding the query to fetch data regarding the document, paragraph number and subsequent documents, could you please explore the possibility of setting up a SQL job across the subscriber side of the application (i.e., in all the tools where these document counts are getting fetched) that would update this data on a daily basis, rather than real-time. In addition, it would probably make more sense to fetch the data at an individual branch level (i.e., when the user is opening the Waste Management branch), rather than the parent branch (i.e., when the user is opening the NAFTA Cases branch). 

Thanks,

Morgan

Hi Harsh ,

Following up on the issue above and further to the video below, loading times in the Subject Navigator have dramatically improved, but it appears that has come at a significant costs. We need to have to references within Jurisprudence Citator accessible to users. It's a key component of what makes ISLG valuable to users.

Need reference numbers for cases and pinpoint references (14-Jan-21).mp4 1.74 MB • Download

Thanks,

Morgan

Hi Morgan ,

We are now showing references within Jurisprudence Citator  count on Subject Navigator tool. Please check and confirm.

Hi Harsh , 

Looks good in the Subject Navigator and Jurisprudence Citator. However, could you confirm that the on-hover reference feature has been reactivated across all the tools on the system when a Dispute Document card is presented to the user, because I noticed it's not currently activated in the Article Citator?

Thanks,

Morgan

Hi Morgan ,

We checked and found that it is actives across all research tool on both rebuild.islg and staging.islg. 

When you navigate the cursor on  dispute Document card's icon then it will show reference count.

Hi Harsh :

I have a question related to the number of references shown when hovering over each dispute document. As described in the video below, it seems to count "Generally" referenece and paragraph-specific reference(s) separately even if it is from the same UIN. The example in the video is  UN/0173/02 - A11Y v. Czech Republic Decision on Jurisdiction - 09 February 2017 where there are only two different UINs referring (IC/0456/01 Itisaluna v. Iraq Award - 03 April 2020 and UN/0177/18 Doutremepuich v. Mauritius Award on Jurisdiction - 23 August 2019), but the on-hover reference count shows four "references." I understand how this could have happened, but it is misleading especially compared to the legacy app as shown below. We may want to count only "Generally" references for on-hover count to better reflect the accurate number of references.

image.png 26.3 KB • Download

Reference count (1-Feb-21).mp4 4.46 MB • Download

Hi Harsh ,

To follow-up on Paul 's comments above, there are three issues outstanding with this to-do:

Thanks,

Morgan

Problem with on-hover references (1-Feb-21).mp4 6.66 MB • Download

Hi Morgan ,

We are displaying count on hover while we hover on paragraph number and Full Citation of Dispute Document Card only in Subject Navigator module. it means in only SN tool we are displaying count on both places.

For Other research tool, we are displaying count on hover only of Dispute Document Full Citation. 

Hi Morgan and Paul ,

On hover count for Full Citation logic is following for all research tool :

- The Dispute Document Card which we are displaying on research tool that Dispute Document is being used as Source Document in Jurisprudence Citator. 

For example, We are displaying UN/001/01 Dispute Document Card in Article Citator under ICSID 1965 branch. If this UN/001/01 being used as Source Dispute Document in Jurisprudence tool then will display count on hover.

The above is the logic of count as per the requirement.

Ok. Thanks Harsh ​. I'm not really following the logic here.

Melissa ​ and Naomi ​, could you please confirm what the requirements are for the above? Where should we be pulling data for the Full Citation on-hover references?

Thanks,

Morgan

Morgan

The on-hover references will show the total number of references to the dispute document in the Jurisprudence Citator. This means all specific references + all general references.

The reason the total may not match what we see for 'All references' is that 'All references' count consolidates multiple citations to the same record in a single document.

Ex:
'UN/001/01' has (1 specific reference to paragraph 2 of UN/002/02)  + (1  specific reference to paragraph 12 of UN/002/02 ) +( 1 general reference of UN/002/02)

Total JPC references to UN/002/02 = 3
All references to UN/002/02 = 1 (because all references are from UN/001/01)

Hopefully this clarifies. Let me know if you'd like to chat further. 

Mel

Hi Melissa ,

Thanks for clarifying, but these requires don't really make sense. "All References" represents all the documents that refer to UN/0001/01, including any specific references. Adding these together artificial inflates the number of references to the document. Could we please change this so that it displays the count for the number "All References". Also, let's change the copy of the on-hover to the following:

Thanks,

Morgan

Hi Morgan , 

Please see card in target process to address this here: https://industrialagency.tpondemand.com/entity/21486-islg-team-feedback-updates-to-indicator

Thanks Naomi .

Harsh and Ketan , note that I've moved this user story into Backlog with a "required before launch" in the title, because we'll need to ensure that the All References on-hover is pulling he appropriate data.

Thanks,

Morgan   

Hi Morgan ,

This change is done on both rebuild.islg and staging.islg.

Hi Harsh ,

The following user story relevant to this to-do is still in progress: https://industrialagency.tpondemand.com/restui/board.aspx?#page=userstory/21486. As a result, I'll keep this to-do open.

Thanks,

Morgan

Hi Morgan ,

In the above story, we need to change only tooltip and we changed and deployed on both staging.islg and rebuild.islg.

Ok. Great. Thanks Harsh .

Naomi , let me know when this clears UAT and I'll give it a review before marking the to-do complete.

Morgan

Hi Morgan ,

This task is completed on staging.islg. Please check and confirm.

Great. Thanks Harsh .

Naomi , let me know if and when https://industrialagency.tpondemand.com/restui/board.aspx?#page=userstory/21486 clears UAT and we'll mark this to-do complete.

Thanks,

Morgan

Hi Morgan , 

I have moved the relevant card to done in target process. 

Hi Naomi and Harsh ,
 
Further to the video below, the issue with the indicator of references is not fixed, In the example I used (IC/0002/01 - Salini Costruttori S.P.A. and Italstrade S.P.A. v. Kingdom of Morocco, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/4, Decision on Jurisdiction, 16 July 2001), the number indicated references does not match up with the applicable results within the Jurisprudence Citator.

Thanks,

Morgan

Problem with on-hover references (3-Mar-21).mp4 4.28 MB • Download

Hi Morgan ,

The referencing count issue is resolved on staging.islg. Please check and confirm.

Great. Thanks Harsh . I'll check this on Monday to ensure the results have accurate after the SQL agent job has run.

Morgan

Hi Harsh ,

I examined the results on staging.islg, and everything looks good. Marking to-do complete.

Morgan