TOLOGIX - ISLG App Rebuild

Provision extract not working

Assigned to
Martin Laporte, CTO at Tologix Martin L.

Comments & Events

Paul Moon
Hi Martin Laporte, CTO at Tologix Martin :

Article Citator contains provision extracts, which is supposed to display the text of each provision. However, it is not working for certain provisions. The video shows UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (1976) and ICSID Arbitration Rules (2006) under Arbitration Rules as examples, but the solution should be applied to all Article Citator entries.

Please add it to unplanned task. 

Thanks,

Paul
Paul Moon
Hi Martin Laporte, CTO at Tologix Martin and Harsh Parikh, Tech Lead at DevIT Harsh :

Was this item addressed during the last sprint? If not, is it included in the current sprint?

Please let me know.

Thanks,

Paul 
Martin Laporte, CTO at Tologix
 Hi Paul Moon Paul ,

I do not see that task under Sprint 10 or our current sprint (11).

I have created a bug in the backlog:
https://dev.azure.com/tologix/ISLGRebuild/_workitems/edit/1377

We can take care of it next week when we begin our new sprint.

Thanks,
-Martin 
Paul Moon
Thanks.
Harsh Parikh, Tech Lead at DevIT
Hi Paul Moon Paul ,

This task is done on staging.islg.

Please check and confirm.

Cc : Martin Laporte, CTO at Tologix Martin  
Paul Moon
Hi Harsh Parikh, Tech Lead at DevIT Harsh :

As shown below, provision extract doesn't seem to be distinguishing any subsequent sub-provisions from the one selected. For example, if I select ICSID Arbitration Rules (2006) Rule 9(1), I want to see only Rule 9(1), not 9(2), 9(3) and so forth.

Each sub-provision should show only the sub-provision indicated, not all the sub-provions that follows. 

Thanks,

Paul
Harsh Parikh, Tech Lead at DevIT
Hi Paul Moon Paul ,

This issue is resolved on staging.islg. Please check and confirm.

Cc : Martin Laporte, CTO at Tologix Martin  
Paul Moon
Hi Harsh Parikh, Tech Lead at DevIT Harsh :

The issue is resolved, but I discovered another problem where ICSID Arbitration Rule 6(2)(b) (2006) is showing a random text that doesn't reflect the actual Rule 6(2)(b) as shown below.

Also, ICSID Arbitration Rule 47(1)(j) is not displaying provision extraction when Rule 47(1) shows the whole sub-provisions.


Please QA other legal instrument provisions before you deploy this to app.islg.

Thanks,

Paul
Harsh Parikh, Tech Lead at DevIT
Hi Paul Moon Paul ,

Could you please check again on staging.islg ? We have checked random Provisions and it seems working fine.

Suppose, if you extract Rule 47 then it will extract whole Rule 47 with its sub provisions but if you will extract only Rule 47.1.e then only that part will be extract from html.

Cc : Martin Laporte, CTO at Tologix Martin  
Paul Moon
Hi Harsh Parikh, Tech Lead at DevIT Harsh :

ICSID Arbitration Rule 47(1)(j) is showing up now instead of "Document text is not available" at the end of the second video above.

When you say it is working fine, do you mean you didn't fix anything?

Also, I think I know why we have an issue with Rule 6(2)(b) now. Please see the video below and change the


Thanks,

Paul
Harsh Parikh, Tech Lead at DevIT
Hi Paul Moon Paul ,

There is an issue to uploaded version on staging.islg. Due to bad health Piyush is on leave today. so once Piyush will come tomorrow then will discuss internally and update the staging.islg for this task.

Cc : Martin Laporte, CTO at Tologix Martin  
Paul Moon
Sounds good, Harsh Parikh, Tech Lead at DevIT Harsh .
Harsh Parikh, Tech Lead at DevIT
Hi Paul Moon Paul ,

We have uploaded new version on staging.islg. Please check again confirm.

Cc : Martin Laporte, CTO at Tologix Martin  
Paul Moon
Looks good, Harsh Parikh, Tech Lead at DevIT Harsh .
Paul Moon
Paul Moon completed this to-do.