Hi Morgan :

As discussed, UN/0151/30 on the new admin site shows the separate opinion related to it (UN/0151/31)

image.png 14.1 KB • Download

The legacy admin site for UN/0151/30 also lists UN/0151/31 as a related decision shown below.
https://www.investorstatelawguide.com/CoreComponents/AddDocumentStep3Type2?docId=12425

image.png 20.1 KB • Download

However, AF/0012/01 doesn't show its related separate opinion listed below on the new admin site

image.png 8.18 KB • Download

The legacy admin site confirms that AF/0012/01 is not entered any differently from UN/0151/30, and AF/0012/02 is entered as a related decision.
https://www.investorstatelawguide.com/CoreComponents/AddDocumentStep3Type2?docId=151

image.png 21.4 KB • Download

We are trying to figure out what is causing this inconsistency of separate opinion appearing or not appearing on the new admin site. 

Thanks,

Paul

Hi Harsh ,

Further to Paul 's description above, we can't figure out way these two documents were treated differently when the data was migrated. Both appear to have similar source data, but with UN/0151/30 the Separate Opinion fields were populated, and then with AF/0012/01 no data was populated in the Separate Opinion fields. Could you please explain the reason why data was populated in one document, but no the other?

Thanks,

Morgan 

Hi Morgan ,

We are not migrated Separate Opinion data in Dispute Documents as per our Migration sheet.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Ho_yBR8gfCIqivmvkPy_hISkDGozdWsXxn46ImeQ-V4/edit#gid=0

The above UIN data entered by Nafiseh   on 22th October 2020. so you are able to see these. as we don't need to migrate those fields so we keep those field data as it is.

The 

Hi Nafiseh ,

Is this true? Were you the one who added the data to the Separate Opinion fields UN/0151/30? If so, that might explain the discrepancy (i.e., the field was not populated by migration data, but by legal analytics review prior to the migration).

Thanks,

Morgan

 

Hi Morgan ,

Yes, I think so. I added data to the Separate Opinion field for a few documents after the first round of migration, and it could be one of them.

Thanks,

Nafiseh

Ok. Thanks for confirming Nafiseh ​.

Paul ​, It sounds like this resolves the discrepancy. The question is what should we do to resolve this across the document collection. Should we attempt to apply this across all Separate Opinions before we launch?

Perhaps this is a project Katrina ​could assist with.

Morgan

Ok, this explains the discrepancy.

Yes, there is already an internal content to-do about this (Separate Opinions - TOLOGIX - ISLG App Rebuild), so I'll organize this task with Nafiseh and Katrina and update the rebuild admin site as necessary.

Thanks,

Paul

Great. Thanks Paul ​.

I'll complete this to-do then.

Morgan