As shown below, a SN branch "Abuse of right" is missing on app.islg. Could you ask DevIT to restore it? I suspect it might have been accidentally deleted.
We checked this issue and found that there is no any missing entries in SN Tress. Actually, the branch is moved to other branch.
I checked logs in database and found that Sharmila did this thing. Might be Sharmila did testing directly on app.islg and move branches to other branch.
For Reference, Following 2 branches are currently in this path.
Branch Name :Abuse of right
OLD Path:: A > Abuse of right
New Path:: E > 'Effective means of asserting claims and enforcing rights' provisions > Abuse of right
Branch Name :Bad faith
OLD Path:: B > Bad faith
New Path:: A > Abuse of process > Bad faith
Branch Name : Saluka v. Czech Republic Partial Award finds that the respondent, in the person of its banking regulator, had to take a decision on a distressed bank and in doing so enjoyed a margin of discretion in the exercise of that responsibility
OLD Path:: B > Business plans > Saluka v. Czech Republic Partial Award finds that the respondent, in the person of its banking regulator, had to take a decision on a distressed bank and in doing so enjoyed a margin of discretion in the exercise of that responsibility
New Path::
A > Acquiescence > Saluka v. Czech Republic Partial Award finds that the respondent, in the person of its banking regulator, had to take a decision on a distressed bank and in doing so enjoyed a margin of discretion in the exercise of that responsibility
Notified 3 people
Harsh Parikh,Tech Lead
Hi
Paul
and
Martin
,
We checked this issue and found that there is no any missing entries in SN Tress. Actually, the branch is moved to other branch.
I checked logs in database and found that Sharmila did this thing. Might be Sharmila did testing directly on app.islg and move branches to other branch.
For Reference, Following 2 branches are currently in this path.
Branch Name :Abuse of right
OLD Path:: A > Abuse of right
New Path:: E > 'Effective means of asserting claims and enforcing rights' provisions > Abuse of right
Branch Name :Bad faith
OLD Path:: B > Bad faith
New Path:: A > Abuse of process > Bad faith
Branch Name : Saluka v. Czech Republic Partial Award finds that the respondent, in the person of its banking regulator, had to take a decision on a distressed bank and in doing so enjoyed a margin of discretion in the exercise of that responsibility
OLD Path:: B > Business plans > Saluka v. Czech Republic Partial Award finds that the respondent, in the person of its banking regulator, had to take a decision on a distressed bank and in doing so enjoyed a margin of discretion in the exercise of that responsibility
New Path::
A > Acquiescence > Saluka v. Czech Republic Partial Award finds that the respondent, in the person of its banking regulator, had to take a decision on a distressed bank and in doing so enjoyed a margin of discretion in the exercise of that responsibility
Notified 3 people
Harsh Parikh,Tech Lead
Hi
Martin
and
Paul
,
Following, are the branch names which moved to another branch using Sharmila's user.
Abuse of process
Abuse of right
Bad faith
Objections to jurisdiction and/or the merits based on expedited procedures
Causes of action and claims
Abuse of corporate form (legal personality, etc.)
Saluka v. Czech Republic Partial Award finds that the respondent, in the person of its banking regulator, had to take a decision on a distressed bank and in doing so enjoyed a margin of discretion in the exercise of that responsibility
See "Expropriation: Distinguishing between expropriation and other measures"
See "Judicial (or procedural) economy"
Notified 3 people
Martin Laporte,CTO
Hi
Harsh
,
I have 2 questions:
Some of the branches you listed above seem to be at the right place. For example, I see "Abuse of process" under "A":
You did mention that the easiest way to resolve this would be for Paul to move the branches back to their original spots. How do we know where the moved branches are currently located, and where they should be moved back to?
Thanks, -Martin
Notified 3 people
Harsh Parikh,Tech Lead
Hi
Martin
Following is the details of branch, so admin user can find it and move it to correct location.
Harsh
and I discussed the "Bifurcation" question above. Harsh did compare against staging, and we found one entry under Bifurcation. That entry is part of the list Harsh provided above, which means we will see it again once you move the branches back to their original location.
As shown below, a SN branch "Abuse of right" is missing on app.islg. Could you ask DevIT to restore it? I suspect it might have been accidentally deleted.
Thanks,
Paul
This is an urgent issue. Please make this your top priority on Tuesday.
I have created DevOps task https://dev.azure.com/tologix/ISLGRebuild/_workitems/edit/2037 to track it.
Thanks,
-Martin
We checked this issue and found that there is no any missing entries in SN Tress. Actually, the branch is moved to other branch.
I checked logs in database and found that Sharmila did this thing. Might be Sharmila did testing directly on app.islg and move branches to other branch.
For Reference, Following 2 branches are currently in this path.
Branch Name : Abuse of right
OLD Path::
A > Abuse of right
New Path::
E > 'Effective means of asserting claims and enforcing rights' provisions > Abuse of right
Branch Name : Bad faith
OLD Path::
B > Bad faith
New Path::
A > Abuse of process > Bad faith
Branch Name : Saluka v. Czech Republic Partial Award finds that the respondent, in the person of its banking regulator, had to take a decision on a distressed bank and in doing so enjoyed a margin of discretion in the exercise of that responsibility
OLD Path::
B > Business plans > Saluka v. Czech Republic Partial Award finds that the respondent, in the person of its banking regulator, had to take a decision on a distressed bank and in doing so enjoyed a margin of discretion in the exercise of that responsibility
New Path::
A > Acquiescence > Saluka v. Czech Republic Partial Award finds that the respondent, in the person of its banking regulator, had to take a decision on a distressed bank and in doing so enjoyed a margin of discretion in the exercise of that responsibility
We checked this issue and found that there is no any missing entries in SN Tress. Actually, the branch is moved to other branch.
I checked logs in database and found that Sharmila did this thing. Might be Sharmila did testing directly on app.islg and move branches to other branch.
For Reference, Following 2 branches are currently in this path.
Branch Name : Abuse of right
OLD Path::
A > Abuse of right
New Path::
E > 'Effective means of asserting claims and enforcing rights' provisions > Abuse of right
Branch Name : Bad faith
OLD Path::
B > Bad faith
New Path::
A > Abuse of process > Bad faith
Branch Name : Saluka v. Czech Republic Partial Award finds that the respondent, in the person of its banking regulator, had to take a decision on a distressed bank and in doing so enjoyed a margin of discretion in the exercise of that responsibility
OLD Path::
B > Business plans > Saluka v. Czech Republic Partial Award finds that the respondent, in the person of its banking regulator, had to take a decision on a distressed bank and in doing so enjoyed a margin of discretion in the exercise of that responsibility
New Path::
A > Acquiescence > Saluka v. Czech Republic Partial Award finds that the respondent, in the person of its banking regulator, had to take a decision on a distressed bank and in doing so enjoyed a margin of discretion in the exercise of that responsibility
Following, are the branch names which moved to another branch using Sharmila's user.
I have 2 questions:
Thanks,
-Martin
Following is the details of branch, so admin user can find it and move it to correct location.
Cc :
What about "Bifurcation"?
Thanks,
-Martin
Thanks,
-Martin