Hi Paul ,

This entry was migrated from legacy.  However, I think the entry on legacy had the wrong UIN.

The UIN entered is:
IC/0001/01 - Mihaly v. Sri Lanka Award - 15 March 2002

Should  IC/0001/01 be changed to IC/0142/01 - Malicorp v. Egypt Award?

J    
Jurisdictional issues under the ICSID Convention    
The Centre's jurisdiction under Article 25 of the ICSID Convention     
The jurisdiction of the Centre ratione materiae     
Determining the existence of an "investment" and a dispute arising "directly" out of that investment     Determining the existence of an "investment"    
The complementary aspects of the ICSID Convention and the BIT Malicorp v. Egypt Award considers that the BIT emphasizes the "fruits and assets" resulting from the investment, which must be protected, whereas the definitions generally used in relation to Article 25 of the Convention lay stress on the contributions that have been created by such fruits and assets; it infers that assets cannot be protected unless they result from contributions and contributions will not be protected unless they have actually produced the assets of which the investor claims to have been deprived

app.islg

image.png 32.1 KB • Download