Duplicate entries that appear under different branches were incorrectly deleted during DevIT's SN Audit.

For example, UN/0095/64 Ballantine v. Dominican Republic Partial Dissenting Opinion of Marney L. Cheek on Jurisdiction

See app.islg legacy admin site, Master Tree - Branch Destination Code Entries, UN/0095/64
There are 8 SN entries on app.islg legacy admin site.
1.UN/0095/64, paragraph 11
2.UN/0095/64, paragraph 11
3.UN/0095/64, paragraph 12
4.UN/0095/64, paragraph 12
5.UN/0095/64, paragraph 21-29
6.UN/0095/64, paragraph 21-29
7.UN/0095/64, paragraph 3
8.UN/0095/64, paragraph 3

image.png 45.4 KB • Download

***
See app.islg admin site, Master Lists, Dispute Document UN/0095/64, Analysis, Subject Navigator
There are 4 SN entries on app.islg legacy admin site.
1.UN/0095/64, paragraph 3
2.UN/0095/64, paragraph 3
3.UN/0095/64, paragraph 21-29
4.UN/0095/64, paragraph 12

As you can see, 4 entries are missing. Paragraph 11, paragraph 11, paragraph 21-29 and paragraph 12.

image.png 77.7 KB • Download

***
See app.islg legacy admin site, Master Tree Search, Search Tree: "Marney L. Cheek"

The text highlighted green are duplicate entries that are entered under different branches of the SN.
The text highlighted blue are duplicate entries that are entered under different branches of the SN.
The text highlighted purple are duplicate entries that are entered under different branches of the SN.

image.png 137 KB • Download

***
See app.islg admin site, Master Tree and Reports, Subject Navigator: Search for "Marney L. Cheek"

There are 8 entries, just like on app.islg legacy site. However, there are four entries that had the correct UIN removed and replaced with incorrect UINs.  See text underlined in red.  These entries need to be changed back to match the entries on legacy.

image.png 102 KB • Download

image.png 96.3 KB • Download

***
These are the four SN entries that need to be changed back to match the entries on legacy.

Important Note: 

J
Jurisdictional issues under CAFTA
The nationality requirement under CAFTA Article 10.28

Ballantine v. Dominican Republic Partial Dissenting Opinion of Marney L. Cheek on Jurisdiction disagrees with the majority's view and considers the relevant period of time for determining dominant and effective nationality is an individual's contacts over a lifetime - SC/0011/02 - Quasar de Valors v. Russia Separate Opinion of Charles N. Brower - 20 March 2009

N
Nationality and the standing to bring claims
General approaches to issues of nationality and specific findings

Ballantine v. Dominican Republic Partial Dissenting Opinion of Marney L. Cheek on Jurisdiction disagrees with the majority's view and considers the relevant period of time for determining dominant and effective nationality is an individual's contacts over a lifetime - SC/0011/02 - Quasar de Valors v. Russia Separate Opinion of Charles N. Brower - 20 March 2009

Ballantine v. Dominican Republic Partial Dissenting Opinion of Marney L. Cheek on Jurisdiction disagrees with the majority that the application of the dominant and effective nationality test set forth in DR-CAFTA Article 10.28 should be applied to give greater weight to investment-related connections with the host State, because DR-CAFTA is an investment treaty - SC/0011/02 - Quasar de Valors v. Russia Separate Opinion of Charles N. Brower - 20 March 2009

Ballantine v. Dominican Republic Partial Dissenting Opinion of Marney L. Cheek on Jurisdiction considers the narrow reasons for obtaining host State nationality (investment-related economic self-interest) are an important factor to be considered in the dominant and effective nationality analysis - IC/0158/17 - Al Tamimi v. Oman Award - 27 October 2015*

*The entry with the same text that appears under the other branch  J->Jurisdictional issues under CAFTA->The nationality requirement under CAFTA Article 10.28 is included in the spreadsheet provided by Harsh (Jan-25-2022). "SN_Wrong_Check_Entries_25012022".  For that entry, the correct UIN was kept.

***

cc Martin Paul