Under J - Judicial Review - Judicial review of other awards - By the Belgian courts, you see below a Rawat v. Mauritius entry with Eskosol (IC/0005/04) and Rawat (UN/0107/04) UINs.
Eskosol UIN should not appear. As shown in the video below, all irrelevant UINs other than UN/0107/04 should be removed. This issue is not limited to this specific entry; an audit should be conducted to remove all the wrong UINs. It affects how these entries show up to subscribers.
We have already gone beyond the allocated 30 hours for unplanned issues in this sprint. Can we work on that issue in the next sprint (starts next week)?
Thanks, -Martin
Notified 2 people
Paul Moon
Hi
Martin
:
Ok, we can wait until the next sprint, but could we release it asap before the end of the next sprint as it affects the live site now?
This specific task is done for app.silg. Please check and confirm.
As we discussed in Tuesday meeting, I will do second round of audit and provide you feedback within few days.
Notified 3 people
Paul Moon
Hi
Harsh
:
IC/0005/04 Eskosol UIN has been removed. However, the subsequent two entries in the same branch still has the same issue as shown in the video below. Please confirm whether this is a different kind of audit you have to do before I can mark it complete.
We have removed those entries which you shown in video. This is same kind of audit which we will perform by next week.
But, if you find this kind of entries then please send to us so we can find those entries with different different pattern.
Cc :
Martin
Notified 3 people
Paul Moon
Hi
Harsh
:
The specific example is resolved. Please let me know when you finish performing the audit next week, so
Irit
could test around.
The video below is another example under A - Annulment under the ICSID Convention -Stay of enforcement of award during annulment proceedings -General discussions on stay of enforcement of the award. Please let us know if this is a different pattern or not.
I had to edit those entries yesterday after reporting the problem. To make this problem even worse, sometimes the correct UIN gets inserted among erroneous ones after making edit (see 4:05 of the last video SN audit erroneous result 4 (24-Jan-22).mp4). You can insert a test entry yourself and keep it inactive.
You can see below the issue of 2 out of the 3 remaining UN/0382/01 SN entries that do not have UN/0382/01 UIN entered (the examples show IC/0171/01) compared to legacy admin.
This issue is similar to Subject Navigator entries missing/incorrectly displaying - TOLOGIX - ISLG App Rebuild for Tologix.
Under J - Judicial Review - Judicial review of other awards - By the Belgian courts, you see below a Rawat v. Mauritius entry with Eskosol (IC/0005/04) and Rawat (UN/0107/04) UINs.
Eskosol UIN should not appear. As shown in the video below, all irrelevant UINs other than UN/0107/04 should be removed. This issue is not limited to this specific entry; an audit should be conducted to remove all the wrong UINs. It affects how these entries show up to subscribers.
Please tackle this issue as soon as possible.
Thanks,
Paul
We have already gone beyond the allocated 30 hours for unplanned issues in this sprint.
Can we work on that issue in the next sprint (starts next week)?
Thanks,
-Martin
Ok, we can wait until the next sprint, but could we release it asap before the end of the next sprint as it affects the live site now?
Thanks,
Paul
I have created Bug https://dev.azure.com/tologix/ISLGRebuild/_workitems/edit/1373 in DevOps, and I have specified in the comments that we'd like this to be installed on app.islg as soon as it is successfully tested.
Please approve and prioritize the issue.
Thanks,
-Martin
Paul
This specific task is done for app.silg. Please check and confirm.
As we discussed in Tuesday meeting, I will do second round of audit and provide you feedback within few days.
IC/0005/04 Eskosol UIN has been removed. However, the subsequent two entries in the same branch still has the same issue as shown in the video below. Please confirm whether this is a different kind of audit you have to do before I can mark it complete.
Thanks,
Paul
We have removed those entries which you shown in video. This is same kind of audit which we will perform by next week.
But, if you find this kind of entries then please send to us so we can find those entries with different different pattern.
Cc :
The specific example is resolved. Please let me know when you finish performing the audit next week, so
The video below is another example under A - Annulment under the ICSID Convention - Stay of enforcement of award during annulment proceedings - General discussions on stay of enforcement of the award. Please let us know if this is a different pattern or not.
Paul
Another pattern here where the correct UIN was not entered (no longer duplicate or phantom only) on app.islg SN Master Tree at all.
We will investigate and let you know. But, Today we gone to see those entries but seems OK on app.islg.
Does anyone delete that wrong entry by yesterday ?
I had to edit those entries yesterday after reporting the problem. To make this problem even worse, sometimes the correct UIN gets inserted among erroneous ones after making edit (see 4:05 of the last video SN audit erroneous result 4 (24-Jan-22).mp4). You can insert a test entry yourself and keep it inactive.
You can see below the issue of 2 out of the 3 remaining UN/0382/01 SN entries that do not have UN/0382/01 UIN entered (the examples show IC/0171/01) compared to legacy admin.