✔ UN/0171/02 SN Analysis List entries (phantom entries)
Completed by Irit W.
- Assigned to
-
Martin L.
- Notes
-
Please see the Subject Navigator Analysis List. The entries highlighted in red should not be there. The issue is only on the Admin site. They do not appear on the Live Site. This is similar to this issue posted: IC/0106/02 SN Analysis List entries (phantom entries) - TOLOGIX - ISLG App Rebuild
(1)
O > Objections to jurisdiction and/or the merits based on expedited procedures > Under the ICSID Arbitration Rules > Findings in specific cases
Almasryia v. Kuwait Dissenting Opinion on the Respondent Application under Rule 41(5) of the ICSID Arbitration Rules holds the respondent has not satisfied the applicable standard of proof in respect of its objections under Rule 41(5) – i.e., that of manifest lack of legal merit
It is entered correctly on legacy. The correct UIN is IC/0484/02.
On app.islg SN it appears twice.
Once under the correct UIN, IC/0484/02.
And the other entry appears under the wrong UIN, IC/0171/02. However, if you click "Edit", the correct UIN is entered.
***
(2)
J > Jurisdictional issues under investment treaties > Notice of claim periods and "amicable settlement" and negotiation requirements of certain treaties > Findings in specific cases (including non-treaty ICSID cases)
Almasryia v. Kuwait Dissenting Opinion on the Respondent Application under Rule 41(5) of the ICSID Arbitration Rules notes the award does not comply with due process requirements in connection with the representation of the claimant in dealings with the Kuwaiti authorities and finds the respondent’s objection has to be dismissed as it fails to demonstrate that, obviously, the notice of dispute would be a mandatory consultation mechanism, that consultations would not be futile, and that the claimant is not validly represented by its joint venture partner
It is entered correctly on legacy. The correct UIN is IC/0484/02.
On app.islg SN it appears twice.
Once under the correct UIN, IC/0484/02.
And the other entry appears under the wrong UIN, IC/0171/02. However, if you click "Edit", the correct UIN is entered.
Can you address this issue? Can you also help us understand why we see differences between Admin and Subscriber sides?
Thanks,
--Martin
This entries are resolved on app.islg. Please check and confirm. In next sprint will do full audit for this kind of entries.
Please check this and mark it complete if the issue is resolved.
Thanks,
Paul
The issue is resolved. Marking this complete.
Thanks,
Irit