Hi Harsh ​,

Could you please address this as an Unplanned/Critical task.

Thanks,

Morgan

Hi Irit ,

This is not bug. As per functionality, You can not edit the hard coded field through html. You can only able to edit the non-hardcoded fields.

Hi Harsh ,

Almost all of the fields that we plan to ask analysts to fill in are hardcoded then. Only "Status", "Appointing Authority" and "Expert" fields could be added/edited on the HTML. We plan to ask analysts to add/edit Dispute Details directly through HTML so the when they are assigned "Analyze: Data Capture", they could add/edit dispute info themselves rather than us adding/editing under Master Lists -> Disputes.

Thanks,

Nafiseh

Morgan and Paul ,

Should we revisit the current design? Is there a reason why most of these fields are read-only?

Thanks,
--Martin

Hi Martin :

I am not sure how much of a task this would be, but the content team would like the analysts to be able to edit all fields that Nafiseh showed in her video. Otherwise, the data capture process would get much more onerous on the content team causing further delay.

Thanks,

Paul

Hi Harsh ,

Before we go too far down the rabbit whole here, could list all the fields that are blocked from editing while the admin user is performing analysis? I can understand why we might block editing mandatory fields like the Case Name and Case Number, but otherwise admin users should be able to edit any of the other fields.

Also, we'll need to get this resolved as soon as possible so that Nafiseh and Paul can do their work. Could you provide an estimate on how long it would take to change this requirement so that all fields are editable? Depending on the estimated effort, we may need to integrate this into the current sprint as an Unplanned/Critical task.

Thanks,

Morgan

Hi Morgan ,

Here is the list of all the fields I am blocked from editing when I want to edit "dispute details" directly on the HTML:

Case Name
Case Number
Applicable Rules
UIN
Short Title
Citation
Subject
Economic Sector
Notice of Arbitration / Date of Registration (ICSID)
Parties (Claimant(s), Claimant(s) Nationality, Respondent State)
Place of Arbitration
Counsel
Tribunal (including Tribunal Secretary)
Annulment Committee
Tribunal (Resubmission)
Annulment Committee (Resubmission)

Thanks,

Nafiseh

Thanks Nafiseh .

Paul and Nafiseh are any of the fields above that we should limit giving legal analysts access to edit? For example, I assume we do not want them editing the Case Name, Case Number and UIN?

Morgan

Hi Morgan :

Yes, we do not want analysts to be able to edit the following (keep them blocked):

Case Name
Case Number
UIN
Short Title 
Citation
Subject
Economic Sector

However, analysts performing data capture directly on HTML should be able to edit the following:

Applicable Rules
Notice of Arbitration / Date of Registration (ICSID) 
Parties (Claimant(s), Claimant(s) Nationality, Respondent State)
Place of Arbitration
Counsel
Tribunal (including Tribunal Secretary)
Annulment Committee
Tribunal (Resubmission)
Annulment Committee (Resubmission)

Thanks,

Paul

Great. Thanks Paul .

Harsh , could you provide an estimated effort on making the hard-coded fields above editable and then hopefully we can get this resolved as a priority as an Unplanned/Critical task?

Thanks,

Morgan

Hi Morgan and Paul ,

If we allow all fields in editable mode then it is OK for you ? Because it is less effort task for us if we allow all fields in editable mode.

Please confirm.

Hi Harsh :

I will be ok with analysts being able to edit all fields if that's easier for you.

Thanks,

Paul

Hi Harsh ,

Could you please provide us with an update on this to-do? We need to get this issue resolved as a priority because until this issue is resolved, we are not able to assign tasks to our analysts.

I would appreciate it if you could provide us with a timeline.

Thanks,

Nafiseh 

Hi Paul and Nafiseh ,

This task is completed on both app.islg and staging.islg. As we decided we are allowing all fields in editable mode.

Please refresh the Page properly and check on app.islg.

Hi Harsh ,

I checked on app.islg. It looks good. I'll mark this to-do as complete.

Thanks,

Nafiseh

Hi Paul,

Yes, I can do that today.

Thanks,

Nafiseh